I agree...and disagree. RYHA needs fixed; but they refuse to be fixed. It would be a messy battle, but the board needs to be replaced and new leadership installed, one that would implement teams at the A & B levels which represent the 3 public schools. I'm not convinced, however, that this would encourage more participation by girls.birdielane wrote:Lots of things need to be fixed in Roch. Big 9 is not really to blame.
I'm not ready to completely absolve the Big 9. Essentially, they didn't want the Rochester teams to be too good. I understand that some could deem it unfair that the best team is a co-op. However, with a little thought, they'd realize that Mayo is going to be the best team in conference, regardless. Now, their solution led to the elimination of girls hockey at Century.
I know (now, at least,) that they gave Rochester warning long ago. Still, their inflexible stance is keeping girls out of hockey, bottom line. And simply telling Rochester that they're going to stop the AA co-ops isn't going to create more hockey players out of thin air. For at least 3 years, the Rochester U14 team has had a team with fewer than 15 players. Thats for all of Rochester. The numbers increase in the future. With a minimum of study and some patience, the Big 9 could have seen when the split could be achieved.
I'm most angered with Rochester administration right now. They didn't give the teams enough warning about the situation. There's a frantic scramble at Century now to recruit enough new players in order to have a team. If administration had made it clear how serious the situation would become, there would be a team in place at Century, even if it included many players new to the game. At least they'd be able to play hockey.