2006-07 Bantam B1 preview
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:58 pm
Tonights D6 Action
EP Red - 1
Minnetonka - 0
Another great BB1 D6 league game. EP red scored a 1st period goal and made it hold up.
Minnetonka - 0
Another great BB1 D6 league game. EP red scored a 1st period goal and made it hold up.
-
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 6:31 pm
- Location: Minnetonka JGA Alumni
Re: Tonights D6 Action
It was a great game! Dropped the boy off at his practice and was thoroughly entertained in Victoria for no cost....and I wasn't at Floydsblueblood wrote:EP Red - 1
Minnetonka - 0
Another great BB1 D6 league game. EP red scored a 1st period goal and made it hold up.
Goal came on a powerplay situation
Both teams skated their butts off and was a shame that someone had to lose. Both goalies played very well and Tonka's had a couple of very difficult saves to help keep the team in the game.
Boy, Ep red still transitions on turnovers quicker than most teams I have seen.
This isn't the Tonka team we saw earlier in the year
-
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:05 am
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:03 am
-
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:05 am
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:03 am
-
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:35 pm
Technical points . . .
10 minute penalties are misconducts, not majors.
A mouthguard penalty would be a 10-minute misconduct for equipment.
Equipment violations only count as 2 minutes against the fair play point system. Other misconducts count full.
So, they could have had a 10-minute misconduct for a mouthguard violation and still had plenty of minutes to spare on their FP amount.
10 minute penalties are misconducts, not majors.
A mouthguard penalty would be a 10-minute misconduct for equipment.
Equipment violations only count as 2 minutes against the fair play point system. Other misconducts count full.
So, they could have had a 10-minute misconduct for a mouthguard violation and still had plenty of minutes to spare on their FP amount.
Oh my .....is right!ohMY wrote:Edina White 2
Chaska 6
no Barney point for Chaska, Edina got theirs
I though the referee crew did an extremely good job except for a 10 minute misconduct for one of the Chaska players calling an Edina player a "spase" even without it, a roughing penalty called with 9 seconds left in the game would have taken the HEP point away.
Chaska shared the puck very well tonight and made that one extra pass on some plays that counted for about 4 of their goals.
-
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 11:31 pm
- Location: van down by the river
I though the referee crew did an extremely good job except for a 10 minute misconduct for one of the Chaska players calling an Edina player a "spase" even without it, a roughing penalty called with 9 seconds left in the game would have taken the HEP point away.
Chaska shared the puck very well tonight and made that one extra pass on some plays that counted for about 4 of their goals.[/quote]
so your saying chaska got a penalty for saying some bad things? if thats true they did the same thing to us when we play them
and chaska and edina lost there hep point?
Chaska shared the puck very well tonight and made that one extra pass on some plays that counted for about 4 of their goals.[/quote]
so your saying chaska got a penalty for saying some bad things? if thats true they did the same thing to us when we play them
and chaska and edina lost there hep point?
-
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 11:31 pm
- Location: van down by the river
The coaches addressed it big time after the game. Losing that hep point could make the difference in seeding by a couple of places. Sometimes young men get caught up in smack rather than tact (as do we parents do from time to timehighschoolhockeyfan wrote:oook but about the chaska player mouthing off? im not supprised

-
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 11:31 pm
- Location: van down by the river
tomASS wrote:The coaches addressed it big time after the game. Losing that hep point could make the difference in seeding by a couple of places. Sometimes young men get caught up in smack rather than tact (as do we parents do from time to timehighschoolhockeyfan wrote:oook but about the chaska player mouthing off? im not supprised- not this game though)
o thats good to hear i know they (ours and theres got in a little argument in the game) but yes the hep point is real big at the end of the season and if you were refuring to yourself i personaly dont think it was that disrespectful but i wasent there so what would i know it happens though you just get caught up in the moment but back to what i was saying i hope it wasent the guy who did it in our game

-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:01 pm
-
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 6:23 pm
Same old story with MG this year.. Troubles putting the puck in the net and very inconsistent play.
The Wayzata Gold game was a strange game in the fact that Mg had 15 penalties and played shorthanded almost all of the 3rd period and most of the game but still out shot Wayzata 24-17 in the game.
Just an overall ugly performance by MG.
I agree with ShootPassScore it will come down to MG and Gold for the final region spot and these teams have played three 2-1 games two going the way of MG.
Its tough to correct the inability to put the puck in the net, you either have goal scorers or you dont. I feel it will be the achilles heel of an overall very talented MG team.
The Wayzata Gold game was a strange game in the fact that Mg had 15 penalties and played shorthanded almost all of the 3rd period and most of the game but still out shot Wayzata 24-17 in the game.
Just an overall ugly performance by MG.
I agree with ShootPassScore it will come down to MG and Gold for the final region spot and these teams have played three 2-1 games two going the way of MG.
Its tough to correct the inability to put the puck in the net, you either have goal scorers or you dont. I feel it will be the achilles heel of an overall very talented MG team.
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:01 pm
C-spondant-Very good overall evaluation of the MG v Gold game. MG had chances, lots of chances, good chances to avail. Its not like they need shooting practice either. They just were unlucky.
It would be easy to let that be a focal point and an excuse. Got to keep digging, MG does have talent and plays the game pretty well overall should be a great D3 playin semifinal.
It would be easy to let that be a focal point and an excuse. Got to keep digging, MG does have talent and plays the game pretty well overall should be a great D3 playin semifinal.