Hill-Murray Update
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
Re: Hill-Murray Update
Back to the issue at hand.
Did someone here say the plaintiffs are the 9 seniors on the team and not the team itself?
If so, if the judge is going to grant relief to anyone, it would be only to the people in the lawsuit itself. Meaning - only those 9 skaters would be able to play in the game tomorrow, to be supplemented by non-affected JV players.
Am I wrong in how this lawsuit was filed?
Did someone here say the plaintiffs are the 9 seniors on the team and not the team itself?
If so, if the judge is going to grant relief to anyone, it would be only to the people in the lawsuit itself. Meaning - only those 9 skaters would be able to play in the game tomorrow, to be supplemented by non-affected JV players.
Am I wrong in how this lawsuit was filed?
-
- Posts: 1008
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 8:26 pm
Re: Hill-Murray Update
That's how I read that too. I read somewhere that those 9 were over 18 years of age, so maybe the rest of the roster has not reached their 18th birthdate yet? I'm not a Legal expert, so outside of being considered an adult I don't know the rationale for this.jg2112 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:58 pm Back to the issue at hand.
Did someone here say the plaintiffs are the 9 seniors on the team and not the team itself?
If so, if the judge is going to grant relief to anyone, it would be only to the people in the lawsuit itself. Meaning - only those 9 skaters would be able to play in the game tomorrow, to be supplemented by non-affected JV players.
Am I wrong in how this lawsuit was filed?
Re: Hill-Murray Update
Yes, the MSHSL is specifically trying to keep one of its biggest brands, who also happen to be the defending champs, out of its crown jewel event. (Sarcasm, in case it wasn’t obvious)Slap Shot wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:53 pmthestickler07 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:16 pmThis whole episode has made me like HM a lot more - the MSHSL are a bunch of bums for trying to keep them out.
I don’t particularly begrudge HM for pursuing all avenues to compete, but the MSHSL is just applying rules equally in this case, the same as it has against other teams.
Re: Hill-Murray Update
So, for everyone saying let them play on Thursday, where at? The X already is booked for four games with the girls semifinals in both classes. Not sure MSHSL want to be renting another sheet of ice somewhere with the limited crowds and the limited dollars coming in. Or do you have HM/Wayzata start at 9 AM at the X?
-
- Posts: 4357
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:22 pm
- Location: Typical homeboy from the O-Town
Re: Hill-Murray Update
Available ice isn't the barrier here.BSUBeaver wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 4:07 pm So, for everyone saying let them play on Thursday, where at? The X already is booked for four games with the girls semifinals in both classes. Not sure MSHSL want to be renting another sheet of ice somewhere with the limited crowds and the limited dollars coming in. Or do you have HM/Wayzata start at 9 AM at the X?
Be kind. Rewind.
Re: Hill-Murray Update
Minors are not considered to have the capacity to file suit, though a parent can file on their behalf. This isn’t my area of expertise, but I’m guessing that, based on the issues involved and the need for expediency, only the players of legal age were named as plaintiffs. The other possibility is a separate action being filed on behalf of the minors, in which case their names would be concealed, but it would be obvious from the names of the parents and context of the action who they were.InThePipes wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 4:03 pmThat's how I read that too. I read somewhere that those 9 were over 18 years of age, so maybe the rest of the roster has not reached their 18th birthdate yet? I'm not a Legal expert, so outside of being considered an adult I don't know the rationale for this.jg2112 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:58 pm Back to the issue at hand.
Did someone here say the plaintiffs are the 9 seniors on the team and not the team itself?
If so, if the judge is going to grant relief to anyone, it would be only to the people in the lawsuit itself. Meaning - only those 9 skaters would be able to play in the game tomorrow, to be supplemented by non-affected JV players.
Am I wrong in how this lawsuit was filed?
-
- Posts: 1008
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 8:26 pm
Re: Hill-Murray Update
O-townClown wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 4:10 pmAvailable ice isn't the barrier here.BSUBeaver wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 4:07 pm So, for everyone saying let them play on Thursday, where at? The X already is booked for four games with the girls semifinals in both classes. Not sure MSHSL want to be renting another sheet of ice somewhere with the limited crowds and the limited dollars coming in. Or do you have HM/Wayzata start at 9 AM at the X?
No, that's certainly not the issue.
-
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:58 am
- Location: East Metro
Re: Hill-Murray Update
I sure they would happy to play at Aldrich. Why don’t they just test the whole team and have the parents foot the bill? If they test negative it’s go time.
Re: Hill-Murray Update
Okay. The issue is that a judge can only grant relief to the entities that are before him/her. I would find it a unique quirk that only these 9 players would be named in the lawsuit and not the rest (and the team!), because those would be the only players the judge could order to play.Stang5280 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 4:21 pmMinors are not considered to have the capacity to file suit, though a parent can file on their behalf. This isn’t my area of expertise, but I’m guessing that, based on the issues involved and the need for expediency, only the players of legal age were named as plaintiffs. The other possibility is a separate action being filed on behalf of the minors, in which case their names would be concealed, but it would be obvious from the names of the parents and context of the action who they were.InThePipes wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 4:03 pmThat's how I read that too. I read somewhere that those 9 were over 18 years of age, so maybe the rest of the roster has not reached their 18th birthdate yet? I'm not a Legal expert, so outside of being considered an adult I don't know the rationale for this.jg2112 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:58 pm Back to the issue at hand.
Did someone here say the plaintiffs are the 9 seniors on the team and not the team itself?
If so, if the judge is going to grant relief to anyone, it would be only to the people in the lawsuit itself. Meaning - only those 9 skaters would be able to play in the game tomorrow, to be supplemented by non-affected JV players.
Am I wrong in how this lawsuit was filed?
Update: I found the lawsuit filing. 8 plaintiffs, all of them seniors, 2 of them are seniors not on the postseason roster.
Last edited by jg2112 on Tue Mar 30, 2021 4:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Hill-Murray Update
This is the Catch 22 all players have been in since the beginning of March. Testing is undoubtedly the last thing HM wants to do today. If they were confident in negative test results, they would not have paid $372 to file a lawsuit and pay the associated attorney fees.SEC Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 4:26 pm I sure they would happy to play at Aldrich. Why don’t they just test the whole team and have the parents foot the bill? If they test negative it’s go time.
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:43 pm
Re: Hill-Murray Update
As I understand it, the issue at hand is not hill testing negative, but the exposure in the WB Section final and the resulting 7 day quarantine.jg2112 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 4:29 pmThis is the Catch 22 all players have been in since the beginning of March. Testing is undoubtedly the last thing HM wants to do today. If they were confident in negative test results, they would not have filed a lawsuit.SEC Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 4:26 pm I sure they would happy to play at Aldrich. Why don’t they just test the whole team and have the parents foot the bill? If they test negative it’s go time.
Hockey Is For Everyone
Re: Hill-Murray Update
Sparty - Girl on the team tested definitively positively in a very unique situation. First hand exposure, not second hand exposure.
So circumstances are different
SEC Scotty - there is the issue of false positives , among others
There is a way to accomplish this, pioneers could play at 11 PM Wednesday or Mariucci Thursday. This is a treasured Minnesota jewel. Mshsl , Mdh and Governor ought to be able to get it done
So circumstances are different
SEC Scotty - there is the issue of false positives , among others
There is a way to accomplish this, pioneers could play at 11 PM Wednesday or Mariucci Thursday. This is a treasured Minnesota jewel. Mshsl , Mdh and Governor ought to be able to get it done
-
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:58 am
- Location: East Metro
Re: Hill-Murray Update
Right now stupidity > common sense.WestMetro wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 4:45 pm Sparty - Girl on the team tested definitively positively in a very unique situation. First hand exposure, not second hand exposure.
So circumstances are different
SEC Scotty - there is the issue of false positives , among others
There is a way to accomplish this, pioneers could play at 11 PM Wednesday or Mariucci Thursday. This is a treasured Minnesota jewel. Mshsl , Mdh and Governor ought to be able to get it done
-
- Posts: 1008
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 8:26 pm
Re: Hill-Murray Update
And half the people in the world don't realize which side they're on right now.SEC Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 4:55 pmRight now stupidity > common sense.WestMetro wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 4:45 pm Sparty - Girl on the team tested definitively positively in a very unique situation. First hand exposure, not second hand exposure.
So circumstances are different
SEC Scotty - there is the issue of false positives , among others
There is a way to accomplish this, pioneers could play at 11 PM Wednesday or Mariucci Thursday. This is a treasured Minnesota jewel. Mshsl , Mdh and Governor ought to be able to get it done
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:43 pm
Re: Hill-Murray Update
WCCO TV reporting now that the judge has ruled against the 9 players.
Hockey Is For Everyone
Re: Hill-Murray Update
Rules are rules, ninjas.
Re: Hill-Murray Update
Well, this years’ tourney is a hard pass for me... don’t care at all if this is how the MSHSL is going to act. Garbage way to end a garbage year.East Side Pioneer Guy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 5:14 pm WCCO TV reporting now that the judge has ruled against the 9 players.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2018 11:39 am
Re: Hill-Murray Update
As my grandma would say "don't confuse me with the facts'
1) HM has no + players - even proving all negative tests the MDH won't let them play until 12am Thursday and MSHSL won't move the game
2) A + test wasn't officially presented to the school. A phone from AD to AD was made. HM has requested a letter from MDH and proof of a + PCR approved test, as of this am. Nothing has been sent
3) MDH is not applying the rules the same to all teams. Another hockey team in the exact same situation was allowed to play in the past 2 weeks. The MDH person they got agreed it didn't constitute close contact. Also a basketball team was allowed to compete on Day 5, HM's MDH person is saying 7 days. (Keep in mind we have no proof of an actual test or when symptoms actually started. Convenient to say they started just inside the 48 hour window, hmmmm)
4) MSHSL hasn't made any decisions in the other cases people are bringing up. They have stayed out of it saying it was between MDH and the school administration to make the decision. In all cases brought up the school administration didn't allow their team to play based on their schools interpretation of the recommendations. In the 2 cases (basketball team and hockey team- their administrations worked with the MDH and concluded the teams could play)
5) Of Note: Hermantown has a player playing who just got off a plane, didn't do the required MDH quarantine but is playing in the game. So NO the MDH and MSHSL aren't consistent at all
OH YA- and these are NOT laws, they are recommendations. All along they have been recommendations. There is actual game footage where you can watch every single second and count how long every single player was within 6' of the "alleged" positive case. 4 seconds is the maximum amount of time that masked players were within 6' TOTAL for the entire game.
There is so much more, but here is a start on the actual facts of the situation.
1) HM has no + players - even proving all negative tests the MDH won't let them play until 12am Thursday and MSHSL won't move the game
2) A + test wasn't officially presented to the school. A phone from AD to AD was made. HM has requested a letter from MDH and proof of a + PCR approved test, as of this am. Nothing has been sent
3) MDH is not applying the rules the same to all teams. Another hockey team in the exact same situation was allowed to play in the past 2 weeks. The MDH person they got agreed it didn't constitute close contact. Also a basketball team was allowed to compete on Day 5, HM's MDH person is saying 7 days. (Keep in mind we have no proof of an actual test or when symptoms actually started. Convenient to say they started just inside the 48 hour window, hmmmm)
4) MSHSL hasn't made any decisions in the other cases people are bringing up. They have stayed out of it saying it was between MDH and the school administration to make the decision. In all cases brought up the school administration didn't allow their team to play based on their schools interpretation of the recommendations. In the 2 cases (basketball team and hockey team- their administrations worked with the MDH and concluded the teams could play)
5) Of Note: Hermantown has a player playing who just got off a plane, didn't do the required MDH quarantine but is playing in the game. So NO the MDH and MSHSL aren't consistent at all
OH YA- and these are NOT laws, they are recommendations. All along they have been recommendations. There is actual game footage where you can watch every single second and count how long every single player was within 6' of the "alleged" positive case. 4 seconds is the maximum amount of time that masked players were within 6' TOTAL for the entire game.
There is so much more, but here is a start on the actual facts of the situation.
-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2020 6:22 am
Re: Hill-Murray Update
Rules are rules and mshl is not everyones favorite. In hindsite, knowing what the rule is for COVID quarantine, why did they not make sure the section games were scheduled so the state tourney was in excess of 7 days out? That way, if there was a COVID issue preventing the qualifying team from taking part, blame could be placed solely on that team. Seems to me to have been a no brained.
Re: Hill-Murray Update
Have a great spring!kpryan88 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 5:35 pmWell, this years’ tourney is a hard pass for me... don’t care at all if this is how the MSHSL is going to act. Garbage way to end a garbage year.East Side Pioneer Guy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 5:14 pm WCCO TV reporting now that the judge has ruled against the 9 players.
-
- Posts: 1130
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:42 am
- Location: RIGHT BEHIND YOU!!!!
Re: Hill-Murray Update
Barring a last-minute miracle, it certainly appears that Hill will not be playing.
Appreciate Wayzata’s willingness to adjust on the fly. Good luck to them and the other remaining teams! Stay safe and enjoy the experience!
Appreciate Wayzata’s willingness to adjust on the fly. Good luck to them and the other remaining teams! Stay safe and enjoy the experience!
The City of Hill Murray is beautiful this time of year
-
- Posts: 4357
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:22 pm
- Location: Typical homeboy from the O-Town
Re: Hill-Murray Update
Jacques, thanks for sharing. So the legal challenge did not go anywhere. That leaves MSHSL capitulating, possibly after clarification from MDH after a close look at the information you presented rather than just a blanket edict presented as a guideline.
Barring that, I suppose a one in a million executive order from the governor.
Barring that, I suppose a one in a million executive order from the governor.
Be kind. Rewind.
Re: Hill-Murray Update
I will, let’s go baseball!BobSaget wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 5:46 pmHave a great spring!kpryan88 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 5:35 pmWell, this years’ tourney is a hard pass for me... don’t care at all if this is how the MSHSL is going to act. Garbage way to end a garbage year.East Side Pioneer Guy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 5:14 pm WCCO TV reporting now that the judge has ruled against the 9 players.
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:43 pm
Re: Hill-Murray Update
Old Blue Eyes was right. Some people get their kicks stompin on a dream.
Sad, really.
Hockey Is For Everyone
-
- Posts: 806
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:00 pm
Re: Hill-Murray Update
I hope the High School League is paying you well to carry water for them.Slap Shot wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:53 pmthestickler07 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:16 pmThis whole episode has made me like HM a lot more - the MSHSL are a bunch of bums for trying to keep them out.