Top 75 High School programs of all time--revisited (again)
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7428
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
- Location: Proctor, MN
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7428
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
- Location: Proctor, MN
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7428
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
- Location: Proctor, MN
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7428
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
- Location: Proctor, MN
-
- Posts: 6480
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:03 pm
- Contact:
Thanks for doing this again, Lee. Some random comments:
-For all our talk about how Edina is the gold standard, it's interesting to see that they only passed Roseau in the past 5 years (though separating out Edina East probably makes a difference).
-Nice to see East up to #4, though that's probably their ceiling for the foreseeable future.
-Overall, amazing how many teams in the top 20 are not terribly relevant or even nonexistent now.
-For all our talk about how Edina is the gold standard, it's interesting to see that they only passed Roseau in the past 5 years (though separating out Edina East probably makes a difference).
-Nice to see East up to #4, though that's probably their ceiling for the foreseeable future.
-Overall, amazing how many teams in the top 20 are not terribly relevant or even nonexistent now.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7428
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
- Location: Proctor, MN
I was thinking about doing a similar project with only the "modern era" in mind. Modern era defined as since the Class AA/Class A inception in 1993-94. I can't consider the two years prior to that being an AA/A thing because the Tier II was basically Minnesota's version of the NIT tournament. How could I award points to a team which wasn't seeded in the top eight in their section? Because that's what the 1991-92 and 1992-93 seasons were.karl(east) wrote:Thanks for doing this again, Lee. Some random comments:
-For all our talk about how Edina is the gold standard, it's interesting to see that they only passed Roseau in the past 5 years (though separating out Edina East probably makes a difference).
-Nice to see East up to #4, though that's probably their ceiling for the foreseeable future.
-Overall, amazing how many teams in the top 20 are not terribly relevant or even nonexistent now.
Lee
PageStat Guy on Bluesky
-
- Posts: 2784
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:26 am
- Location: State of Hockey
I'd like to see the modern era version. It would most certainly favor the cites team, but, that's the way it is these days.east hockey wrote:I was thinking about doing a similar project with only the "modern era" in mind. Modern era defined as since the Class AA/Class A inception in 1993-94. I can't consider the two years prior to that being an AA/A thing because the Tier II was basically Minnesota's version of the NIT tournament. How could I award points to a team which wasn't seeded in the top eight in their section? Because that's what the 1991-92 and 1992-93 seasons were.karl(east) wrote:Thanks for doing this again, Lee. Some random comments:
-For all our talk about how Edina is the gold standard, it's interesting to see that they only passed Roseau in the past 5 years (though separating out Edina East probably makes a difference).
-Nice to see East up to #4, though that's probably their ceiling for the foreseeable future.
-Overall, amazing how many teams in the top 20 are not terribly relevant or even nonexistent now.
Lee
What is a Green Wave anyway?
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7428
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
- Location: Proctor, MN
It certainly does. 11 of the top 25 teams in this survey were outstate teams. Only 7 of the top 25 in the Modern Era are.TTpuckster wrote:I'd like to see the modern era version. It would most certainly favor the cites team, but, that's the way it is these days.east hockey wrote:I was thinking about doing a similar project with only the "modern era" in mind. Modern era defined as since the Class AA/Class A inception in 1993-94. I can't consider the two years prior to that being an AA/A thing because the Tier II was basically Minnesota's version of the NIT tournament. How could I award points to a team which wasn't seeded in the top eight in their section? Because that's what the 1991-92 and 1992-93 seasons were.karl(east) wrote:Thanks for doing this again, Lee. Some random comments:
-For all our talk about how Edina is the gold standard, it's interesting to see that they only passed Roseau in the past 5 years (though separating out Edina East probably makes a difference).
-Nice to see East up to #4, though that's probably their ceiling for the foreseeable future.
-Overall, amazing how many teams in the top 20 are not terribly relevant or even nonexistent now.
Lee
Lee
PageStat Guy on Bluesky
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7428
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
- Location: Proctor, MN
#4 is East's ceiling for sure, considering how far they are behind #3. Far more likely that they would drop to #5 with Rapids not far behind them.karl(east) wrote:Thanks for doing this again, Lee. Some random comments:
-For all our talk about how Edina is the gold standard, it's interesting to see that they only passed Roseau in the past 5 years (though separating out Edina East probably makes a difference).
-Nice to see East up to #4, though that's probably their ceiling for the foreseeable future.
-Overall, amazing how many teams in the top 20 are not terribly relevant or even nonexistent now.
Lee
PageStat Guy on Bluesky
#4: Duluth Easteast hockey wrote:#5: Bloomington Jefferson
305.13 points
--5 state titles
--16 state tournaments
--2011 ranking: #4
--2006 ranking: #3
317.05 points
--3 state titles
--22 state tournaments
--2011 ranking: #7
--2006 ranking: #8
Realize DE just keeps rolling and BJ has dropped off the past 10 years, and this is a points based system...but regarding the eye test, I'd rank Jefferson over the Hounds All Time, as 22 >16, BUT 5 >3
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7428
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
- Location: Proctor, MN