The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://ushsho.com/forums/
Putney I would assume?MNHShockey12 wrote:I don't think everyone knows who you are talking about. Can you let people know who you are talking about?mnpuckster wrote:Either way, there were rumors he was heading to play juniors. And I think we all know who I am talking about. Sure he can skate, but wow the mental mistakes were rediculous. He just didnt play up to par. WBL is always solid defensively and I just dont see it this season.
Against Edina, this year, his effort was top of the line, he once outskated his D into the corner and then won the battle with Anders Lee and started a 2 on 1 break. He has definitely changed as a player.Sparlimb wrote:Zepeda's back-checking was one of the major reasons Hill beat Roseau and Edina last year. He did the work when it was necessary and he will again. I actually noticed it last night too, but he certainly is ready to take off when the puck turns over which is his job. We'll take it...SEC Scotty wrote:Hills #7 is one of the fastest in the state. Also spends most of his time suckholing behind the other teams D, doesn't help out much in his own end, and is a graduate of the Robbie Earls school of diving. Fantastic skater though.
i agree, and hes not all that greatTheNightman wrote:Putney I would assume?MNHShockey12 wrote:I don't think everyone knows who you are talking about. Can you let people know who you are talking about?mnpuckster wrote:Either way, there were rumors he was heading to play juniors. And I think we all know who I am talking about. Sure he can skate, but wow the mental mistakes were rediculous. He just didnt play up to par. WBL is always solid defensively and I just dont see it this season.
asfar as i know, Putney, Lowell, and Swanson i beleive all played in some junior camps but none made a junior team.blanco oso wrote:i agree, and hes not all that greatTheNightman wrote:Putney I would assume?MNHShockey12 wrote: I don't think everyone knows who you are talking about. Can you let people know who you are talking about?
Is Zepeda number 10?mnpuckster wrote:The first period was very suprising as it was played fairly evenly, maybe because white bear came out with so much emotion. second and third periods white bear lost their legs and were absolutely dominated in all phases of the game. I am more of a white bear fan than a hill fan, and I it was pretty dissapointing seeing such a one-sided game. As far as the players, Kohls was awesome tonight, and that goal was very nice. Zepeda is quick out there, and can creat a lot of offense fast. For White bear, not to mention any names, I was extremely disspointed with the defensemen who was supposed to be going to the USHL this season. Boy did he play poorly tonight. Terrible turnovers turned into goals for hill. With your best defensemen playing like that, its over for a team like WBL. Offensively I thought Birkenbine was the best on the ice for WB tonight, with 18 and Wahlin as well. Collette made some nice saves, but as some of you had already mentioned, to beat hill in late feb-early march, he is going to have to play ALOT better.
No, he is 7. 10 is Prescott, who I despise.hockeyislife34 wrote:Is Zepeda number 10?mnpuckster wrote:The first period was very suprising as it was played fairly evenly, maybe because white bear came out with so much emotion. second and third periods white bear lost their legs and were absolutely dominated in all phases of the game. I am more of a white bear fan than a hill fan, and I it was pretty dissapointing seeing such a one-sided game. As far as the players, Kohls was awesome tonight, and that goal was very nice. Zepeda is quick out there, and can creat a lot of offense fast. For White bear, not to mention any names, I was extremely disspointed with the defensemen who was supposed to be going to the USHL this season. Boy did he play poorly tonight. Terrible turnovers turned into goals for hill. With your best defensemen playing like that, its over for a team like WBL. Offensively I thought Birkenbine was the best on the ice for WB tonight, with 18 and Wahlin as well. Collette made some nice saves, but as some of you had already mentioned, to beat hill in late feb-early march, he is going to have to play ALOT better.
youll find #7 posted up at the blue line with his stick high in the air 95% of the time just trying to get a break away goal...what a suck holescoreboard33 wrote:No, he is 7. 10 is Prescott, who I despise.hockeyislife34 wrote:Is Zepeda number 10?mnpuckster wrote:The first period was very suprising as it was played fairly evenly, maybe because white bear came out with so much emotion. second and third periods white bear lost their legs and were absolutely dominated in all phases of the game. I am more of a white bear fan than a hill fan, and I it was pretty dissapointing seeing such a one-sided game. As far as the players, Kohls was awesome tonight, and that goal was very nice. Zepeda is quick out there, and can creat a lot of offense fast. For White bear, not to mention any names, I was extremely disspointed with the defensemen who was supposed to be going to the USHL this season. Boy did he play poorly tonight. Terrible turnovers turned into goals for hill. With your best defensemen playing like that, its over for a team like WBL. Offensively I thought Birkenbine was the best on the ice for WB tonight, with 18 and Wahlin as well. Collette made some nice saves, but as some of you had already mentioned, to beat hill in late feb-early march, he is going to have to play ALOT better.
Heaven on earth. Hill Murray Hockey.(Clouds Part) Give me the players they get year in and year out and I could hang a banner.stpaul wrote:...and he was a big part of this
True, but all that talent knows the correct "too" to use...HShockeyz wrote:see those dates
1991 then 2008
not to good considering the talent is pouring out the doors...
stpaul wrote:It's great to have WBL folks whining about Hill-Murray again. Earlier this decade it looked as of WBL was going to take over. They had the better teams for a few years. WBL beat HM 8-0 in the last game of the 2000-2001 season. Now of course HM has won 9 in a row against our friends and hung a new banner at Aldrich. Sorry those banners aren't accurate enough for you. Here's the accurate record:
1970 State Independent Champions
1972 State Independent Champions
1983 State Champions
1991 State Champions
2008 State AA Champions
Hopefully we'll see you March 3rd at the Coliseum. Who said anyting about White Bear?
PS - between 1991-2008 HM did just fine. In those 16 yrs. they won 11 conference titles and 8 section titles. They played in the state finals twice - in 1993 vs. Jefferson and 2002 vs. Holy Angels. During those same years WBL went 0-7 in the state quarterfinals to make it 0-17 all time.
Oh yeah, lest we forget , HM 1 in a row over rival Tartan (split last year).Now of course HM has won 9 in a row against our friends
Not anymore...i suppose things just seem to even themselves out somehow...Pioneerprideguy wrote:Why is that Tartan looks at Hill as a rival & Hill looks at Tartan as just another game on the schedule?