FIRE CHILDRESS

EREmpireStrikesBack · Post by **EREmpireStrikesBack** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 9:49 pm

Neutron 14 wrote:
tomASS wrote:best thing about the whine line is when caller who is 5 x the legal limit gets through
And I'm sure CNT is quite embarrassed about it...

It must be late, or I'm just tired. But he got me again.

packerboy · Post by **packerboy** » Mon Nov 12, 2007 8:52 am

Well, when a team is more concerned about whether one of its marginal players gets funeral pay than the upcoming game against its arch rival, we have a problem.

But again, what did we expect.

No QB, no WR, no coaching.

Without AP, they are winless.

Skol.

tomASS · Post by **tomASS** » Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:42 am

the defensive should work on extra conditioning this week
They will be on the field even more than this past Sunday

RSI · Post by **RSI** » Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:07 am

I know GB is a better team, but 34 points better? They looked mentally unprepared for yesterday's game.

It's a good thing we were able to sign Chilly before GB got him

Irishmans Shanty · Post by **Irishmans Shanty** » Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:19 am

I really lost interest in Sunday afternoons when this team showed up like that for an NFC Championship.

The worst coach in the world still can't be entirely accountable for those disasters. Where is a player's passion to compete on those days?

packerboy · Post by **packerboy** » Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:28 am

Keep AP and then get a broom and clean house.

Gut the franchise of old over paid veterans who cant win and cut loose the bad draft picks and start over.

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Mon Nov 12, 2007 1:09 pm

Neutron 14 wrote:
tomASS wrote:best thing about the whine line is when caller who is 5 x the legal limit gets through
And I'm sure CNT is quite embarrassed about it...

Why do they always tell me "turn your radio down"?
I thought they wanted listeners?

I gave up on them at 1/2 time.
It looks as though the best game this team is going to play all year has most likely already occured.

Govs93 · Post by **Govs93** » Mon Nov 12, 2007 1:18 pm

Can't Never Tried wrote:
Neutron 14 wrote:
tomASS wrote:best thing about the whine line is when caller who is 5 x the legal limit gets through
And I'm sure CNT is quite embarrassed about it...
Why do they always tell me "turn your radio down"?
I thought they wanted listeners?

I gave up on them at 1/2 time.
It looks as though the best game this team is going to play all year has most likely already occured.

I'm not suggesting a playoff run here, but if you look at their schedule the rest of the season, and AP isn't down for an extended period of time (he's already out for this Sunday), it's conceivable they could play themselves out of a top 10 pick.

That's good... right?!

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Mon Nov 12, 2007 2:16 pm

Not that it would have made a "Hole" lot of difference, but how many holding penalties did the Packers get yesterday? I watched the 1st 1/2 , excusing any missed plays while getting more ice cubes

I didn't see one.
Although I did see a lot of holding going on??
I guess why I bring it up is that the Vikes have been stellar against the run, and then suddenly this no name RB walks all over them.

And give me a break on the late hit to Favre, the guy was commited and barely whacked him with his hand, while trying to avoid crushing him, that was just plain a sympathy call.

Next caller please!

Irishmans Shanty · Post by **Irishmans Shanty** » Mon Nov 12, 2007 3:52 pm

Irishmans Shanty wrote:The life expectancy of a pro football player is short, then you have the life expectancy of a running back.

There are times when I hate being right.

ChrisK · Post by **ChrisK** » Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:32 pm

This from Patrick Reusse's column today cracked me up:

There are a couple of things to make clear here, in regards to what Vikings coach Brad Childress had to say about quarterback Tarvaris Jackson during his Monday media session.

First, Childress did not say Jackson was a China doll. He merely raised it as a possibility.

Second, this was a reference to the historic fragility of China dolls, and not to that country's ongoing efforts to poison the youth of America with imported toys.

Reusse could be wrong on the second part, I did feel poisoned after watching as much of Sunday's game as I could stand.

So Tarvaris will be starting on Sunday and AP will not. What's the over/under on when we'll hear the first boos, before the first possession three and out or after?

Govs93 · Post by **Govs93** » Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:35 pm

ChrisK wrote:This from Patrick Reusse's column today cracked me up:

There are a couple of things to make clear here, in regards to what Vikings coach Brad Childress had to say about quarterback Tarvaris Jackson during his Monday media session.

First, Childress did not say Jackson was a China doll. He merely raised it as a possibility.

Second, this was a reference to the historic fragility of China dolls, and not to that country's ongoing efforts to poison the youth of America with imported toys.
Reusse could be wrong on the second part, I did feel poisoned after watching as much of Sunday's game as I could stand.

So Tarvaris will be starting on Sunday and AP will not. What's the over/under on when we'll hear the first boos, before the first possession three and out or after?

I'm already booing.

EREmpireStrikesBack · Tue Nov 13, 2007 10:17 pm

Govs93 wrote:
ChrisK wrote:This from Patrick Reusse's column today cracked me up:

There are a couple of things to make clear here, in regards to what Vikings coach Brad Childress had to say about quarterback Tarvaris Jackson during his Monday media session.

First, Childress did not say Jackson was a China doll. He merely raised it as a possibility.

Second, this was a reference to the historic fragility of China dolls, and not to that country's ongoing efforts to poison the youth of America with imported toys.
Reusse could be wrong on the second part, I did feel poisoned after watching as much of Sunday's game as I could stand.

So Tarvaris will be starting on Sunday and AP will not. What's the over/under on when we'll hear the first boos, before the first possession three and out or after?
I'm already booing.

That's because you don't know any better.

Govs93 · Post by **Govs93** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 8:21 am

EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:
Govs93 wrote:
ChrisK wrote:This from Patrick Reusse's column today cracked me up:
Reusse could be wrong on the second part, I did feel poisoned after watching as much of Sunday's game as I could stand.

So Tarvaris will be starting on Sunday and AP will not. What's the over/under on when we'll hear the first boos, before the first possession three and out or after?
I'm already booing.
That's because you don't know any better.

I'm not following... did we unearth a closet Tarvaris Jackson fan here or what?!

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 8:29 am

Govs93 wrote: I'm not following... did we unearth a closet Tarvaris Jackson fan here or what?!

ER came out of the closet?:shock:

Not that theres anything wrong with it...

EREmpireStrikesBack · Post by **EREmpireStrikesBack** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:16 pm

TJack fan? Hardly.

Out of the closet? Sorry to disappoint Neut, but no.

Undercover Hockey Lover · Wed Nov 14, 2007 4:11 pm

EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:TJack fan? Hardly.

Out of the closet? Sorry to disappoint Neut, but no.

So...you're still in the closet then?

Like the other fella said...Not that theres anything wrong with it...

EREmpireStrikesBack · Post by **EREmpireStrikesBack** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 5:12 pm

Yeah, it's where I hide.

packerboy · Post by **packerboy** » Thu Nov 15, 2007 12:29 pm

Good idea. Especially with all that traffic up there.

Is the construction done yet?

EREmpireStrikesBack · Post by **EREmpireStrikesBack** » Thu Nov 15, 2007 6:40 pm

packerboy wrote:Good idea. Especially with all that traffic up there.

Is the construction done yet?

Is it ever?