Nothern Exposure Tournament results

Discussion of Minnesota Youth Hockey

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

GR3343
Posts: 1198
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:39 pm

Post by GR3343 »

MnPride2 wrote:"90-91 Ice Dogs beat Miners in final"


Would have been us in finals against the Dogs had the Miners not had great hometown help from their ref buddy!! Easily 3-1 on the calls against us,quite possibly the worst case of Homer ref i`ve ever seen,but then again it would have been pretty sad if the hometown team lost to a bunch of 92`s...we outplayed em,but couldn`t outplay the ref...
If the game in question was Miners vs All World, which I assume it is because this was the only game the Miners didn't receive more penalties than the other team, then there should be no complaining. I saw many cheap shots behind the play, then players non stop complaining to the refs. The players should have caught on to the fact that the ref was in zero tolerance mode and was handing out unsportsmanlike calls at the drop of a hat. The All World coach should probably have caught on to this as well as he received several US calls until his ejection. After 1 maybe 2 of these types of calls, maybe just shut the pie hole. Of the 3 or 4 goals the Miners scored, only 1 was a PP so penalties didn't play a major role. Oh, and hats off to the two players that touched off the little mele at the end of the game. The player that ran the Miners goalie went in untouched and plowed the unsuspecting tender, took a couple of whacks for his cheap act, then was defended by an Edina kid who flattened a player that was standing near the tussle from behind. Classy bunch. One more thing, did the refs steal the game the next morning as well?

Just an FYI, the Miners oldest player was a '91. The bulk of the team(all 9 of them)were '92s, and most were not from Duluth.
Last edited by GR3343 on Fri Aug 01, 2008 1:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Character is who you are when no one is watching
Can't Never Tried
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm

Post by Can't Never Tried »

GR3343 wrote:
MnPride2 wrote:"90-91 Ice Dogs beat Miners in final"


Would have been us in finals against the Dogs had the Miners not had great hometown help from their ref buddy!! Easily 3-1 on the calls against us,quite possibly the worst case of Homer ref i`ve ever seen,but then again it would have been pretty sad if the hometown team lost to a bunch of 92`s...we outplayed em,but couldn`t outplay the ref...
If the game in question was Miners vs All World, which I assume it is because this was the only game the Miners didn't receive more penalties than the other team, then there should be no complaining. I saw many cheap shots behind the play, then players non stop complaining to the refs. The players should have caught on to the fact that the ref was in zero tolerance mode and was handing out unsportsmanlike calls at the drop of a hat. The All World coach should probably have caught on to this as well as he received several US calls until his ejection. After 1 maybe 2 of these types of calls, maybe just shut the pie hole. Of the 3 or 4 goals the Miners scored, only 1 was a PP so penalties didn't play a major role. Oh, and hats off to the two players that touched off the little mele at the end of the game. The player that ran the Miners goalie went in untouched and plowed the unsuspecting tender, took a couple of whacks for his cheap act, then was defended by an Edina kid who flattened a player that was standing near the tussle from behind. Classy bunch. One more thing, did the refs steal the game the next morning as well?
Now this is real hockey folks !!!

ImageImage
tomASS
Posts: 2512
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 10:18 pm
Location: Chaska

Post by tomASS »

hiptzech - Wonderfully Brilliant! What happy hour is open at this time of the day and why weren't we all invited???

I sit, corrected regarding the congressional investigation. My faulty reporting has been exposed.

Trophy and medals, once again hiptzech exposes the truth - many soccer clubs provide participation awards for completing water breaks at some youth matches. Rainbow ribbons with the phrase " My kid is a ball kicker" are as common as the dandelions kids pick while playing


CNT - don't worry even I am not excited about the soccer competition at the Olympics - But EPL is only a few weeks away. GO LIVERPOOL.
=D> =D>

Dmom- you're welcome I think it was my sign that said "English Only Parking - Immigration Status Will be Checked!" (done in 24 MN approved languages) that helped influence the ample parking on the Ice Center side.
fighting all who rob or plunder
hiptzech
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 6:46 am

Post by hiptzech »

tomASS wrote:hiptzech - Wonderfully Brilliant! What happy hour is open at this time of the day and why weren't we all invited???

I sit, corrected regarding the congressional investigation. My faulty reporting has been exposed.

Trophy and medals, once again hiptzech exposes the truth - many soccer clubs provide participation awards for completing water breaks at some youth matches. Rainbow ribbons with the phrase " My kid is a ball kicker" are as common as the dandelions kids pick while playing


CNT - don't worry even I am not excited about the soccer competition at the Olympics - But EPL is only a few weeks away. GO LIVERPOOL.
=D> =D>

Dmom- you're welcome I think it was my sign that said "English Only Parking - Immigration Status Will be Checked!" (done in 24 MN approved languages) that helped influence the ample parking on the Ice Center side.
I am lonely...Offers to wake board, drink beers and start a community party...I should post my real thoughts more often.

Image
Can't Never Tried
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm

Post by Can't Never Tried »

hiptzech wrote:
tomASS wrote:hiptzech - Wonderfully Brilliant! What happy hour is open at this time of the day and why weren't we all invited???

I sit, corrected regarding the congressional investigation. My faulty reporting has been exposed.

Trophy and medals, once again hiptzech exposes the truth - many soccer clubs provide participation awards for completing water breaks at some youth matches. Rainbow ribbons with the phrase " My kid is a ball kicker" are as common as the dandelions kids pick while playing


CNT - don't worry even I am not excited about the soccer competition at the Olympics - But EPL is only a few weeks away. GO LIVERPOOL.
=D> =D>

Dmom- you're welcome I think it was my sign that said "English Only Parking - Immigration Status Will be Checked!" (done in 24 MN approved languages) that helped influence the ample parking on the Ice Center side.
I am lonely...Offers to wake board, drink beers and start a community party...I should post my real thoughts more often.

Image
IDK twice in the same day?? :-k
tomASS
Posts: 2512
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 10:18 pm
Location: Chaska

Post by tomASS »

hiptzech wrote: I am lonely.
Ok so if I was profiling you; I would say you don't give women a 100 roses that you meet on Craig's list and that you prefer certain legal aged web sites not allowed to be mentioned on this site.... in other words your fairly normal.:P
hiptzech wrote: Offers to wake board
Oh wait, never mind I thought you said water board. I'm always looking for a new parenting ideas but I guess I misread :cry:
hiptzech wrote: drink beers
improves your level of normalcy especial since you did not mention any day time restrictions.
hiptzech wrote: Community parties
What are you, a Hilary fan? that you think it takes a village to have a party?defining it as a community party .....BAD, you get the wrong element in attendance.

Defining it as a Toga Party.......GOOD, because whoever shows up is then the right element to have

if you weren't posting your real thoughts before, whose thoughts were you posting?

Party on Garth!

:lol: :lol:
fighting all who rob or plunder
DMom
Posts: 993
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 6:46 am

Post by DMom »

Hippy, I understood everything you said, which should be very scary to you.

T, you are da man!!
hiptzech
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 6:46 am

Post by hiptzech »

tomASS wrote:
hiptzech wrote: I am lonely.
Ok so if I was profiling you; I would say you don't give women a 100 roses that you meet on Craig's list and that you prefer certain legal aged web sites not allowed to be mentioned on this site.... in other words your fairly normal.:P
hiptzech wrote: Offers to wake board
Oh wait, never mind I thought you said water board. I'm always looking for a new parenting ideas but I guess I misread :cry:
hiptzech wrote: drink beers
improves your level of normalcy especial since you did not mention any day time restrictions.
hiptzech wrote: Community parties
What are you, a Hilary fan? that you think it takes a village to have a party?defining it as a community party .....BAD, you get the wrong element in attendance.

Defining it as a Toga Party.......GOOD, because whoever shows up is then the right element to have

if you weren't posting your real thoughts before, whose thoughts were you posting?

Party on Garth!

:lol: :lol:
I need to thank you on the community thing..."Hill"? no thanks, although she has some nice hands (for picking potatoes). Before you even go there, stop yourself.
One additional thought on the bearded wonder, she was not one of the AAA moms I was referring to…Imagine looking up in the stands before the drop of the puck to see this.

Image
MnPride2
Posts: 240
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:13 am

Post by MnPride2 »

GR3343 wrote:
MnPride2 wrote:"90-91 Ice Dogs beat Miners in final"


Would have been us in finals against the Dogs had the Miners not had great hometown help from their ref buddy!! Easily 3-1 on the calls against us,quite possibly the worst case of Homer ref i`ve ever seen,but then again it would have been pretty sad if the hometown team lost to a bunch of 92`s...we outplayed em,but couldn`t outplay the ref...
If the game in question was Miners vs All World, which I assume it is because this was the only game the Miners didn't receive more penalties than the other team, then there should be no complaining. I saw many cheap shots behind the play, then players non stop complaining to the refs. The players should have caught on to the fact that the ref was in zero tolerance mode and was handing out unsportsmanlike calls at the drop of a hat. The All World coach should probably have caught on to this as well as he received several US calls until his ejection. After 1 maybe 2 of these types of calls, maybe just shut the pie hole. Of the 3 or 4 goals the Miners scored, only 1 was a PP so penalties didn't play a major role. Oh, and hats off to the two players that touched off the little mele at the end of the game. The player that ran the Miners goalie went in untouched and plowed the unsuspecting tender, took a couple of whacks for his cheap act, then was defended by an Edina kid who flattened a player that was standing near the tussle from behind. Classy bunch. One more thing, did the refs steal the game the next morning as well?

Just an FYI, the Miners oldest player was a '91. The bulk of the team(all 9 of them)were '92s, and most were not from Duluth.

The refs knew your boys,started calling penalties right away...one way...by one ref, the other ref was too incompliant to make a call,example:player comes to the face-off too late...he gets the boot,next player please...the older ref had to tell him that and thats what got our coach going,of course mister "this is my rink" didn`t feel he had to explain why...our coach wanted to know why,if you don`t know how to ref you shouldn`t be there...period, which is what our coach was arguing about. "cheap-shots" behind the play...upp just our team,your angels would never do that(sounds like Icehawks up in Duluth last year)...oh no not our kids :roll: Penalties do play roles,if your skating short-handed most of the game while the other team isn`t,it makes a big difference,sure glad your kids kept their mouths shut...ya right! The player that ran the goalie has issues upstairs...lots,and i will agree it was totally uncalled for. As far as our morning game...same homer ref as the night before,only difference...both teams were from out of town,equal penalties...strange,different outcome though.
tomASS
Posts: 2512
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 10:18 pm
Location: Chaska

Post by tomASS »

MnPride2 wrote: the other ref was too incompliant to make a call
WHAT??? :-s
fighting all who rob or plunder
hiptzech
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 6:46 am

Post by hiptzech »

MnPride2 wrote:
GR3343 wrote:
MnPride2 wrote:"90-91 Ice Dogs beat Miners in final"


Would have been us in finals against the Dogs had the Miners not had great hometown help from their ref buddy!! Easily 3-1 on the calls against us,quite possibly the worst case of Homer ref i`ve ever seen,but then again it would have been pretty sad if the hometown team lost to a bunch of 92`s...we outplayed em,but couldn`t outplay the ref...
If the game in question was Miners vs All World, which I assume it is because this was the only game the Miners didn't receive more penalties than the other team, then there should be no complaining. I saw many cheap shots behind the play, then players non stop complaining to the refs. The players should have caught on to the fact that the ref was in zero tolerance mode and was handing out unsportsmanlike calls at the drop of a hat. The All World coach should probably have caught on to this as well as he received several US calls until his ejection. After 1 maybe 2 of these types of calls, maybe just shut the pie hole. Of the 3 or 4 goals the Miners scored, only 1 was a PP so penalties didn't play a major role. Oh, and hats off to the two players that touched off the little mele at the end of the game. The player that ran the Miners goalie went in untouched and plowed the unsuspecting tender, took a couple of whacks for his cheap act, then was defended by an Edina kid who flattened a player that was standing near the tussle from behind. Classy bunch. One more thing, did the refs steal the game the next morning as well?

Just an FYI, the Miners oldest player was a '91. The bulk of the team(all 9 of them)were '92s, and most were not from Duluth.

The refs knew your boys,started calling penalties right away...one way...by one ref, the other ref was too incompliant to make a call,example:player comes to the face-off too late...he gets the boot,next player please...the older ref had to tell him that and thats what got our coach going,of course mister "this is my rink" didn`t feel he had to explain why...our coach wanted to know why,if you don`t know how to ref you shouldn`t be there...period, which is what our coach was arguing about. "cheap-shots" behind the play...upp just our team,your angels would never do that(sounds like Icehawks up in Duluth last year)...oh no not our kids :roll: Penalties do play roles,if your skating short-handed most of the game while the other team isn`t,it makes a big difference,sure glad your kids kept their mouths shut...ya right! The player that ran the goalie has issues upstairs...lots,and i will agree it was totally uncalled for. As far as our morning game...same homer ref as the night before,only difference...both teams were from out of town,equal penalties...strange,different outcome though.
Sounds to me like you nor your coach know how to ref or coach for that matter. Don't have enough information on your complaint other than the vague discriptions that you have laid out. I can only surmize from your previous post that you are of the belief that you had a tainted ref, if true that is unfortunate. But, if you didn't have a tainted ref and your assumptions are wrong then you need a good education in reffing and coaching.
I can only pull from the one kind of vague example of a player getting booted for coming to the face off late. This is real simple, come to the face off late and you are automatically booted, not a homer call at all. GAME MANAGEMENT. Real simple, set the tone for the behavior for face offs in the game so when you get to critical face offs at the end of the game there are no percieved advantages taken by any team. Another point on GAME MANAGEMENT, was it running time. Savy coaches (not neccessary good coaches) will intentially delay putting their playere on the ice to eat up valuable clock time. Once again, GAME MANAGEMENT.
With regard to my lack of coaching ability comment, I would say this. With something as simple and basic as kicking a player out of the face off for coming late an educated and talented coach needs no explaination. Pulling the ref over to discuss something as simple as putting on skates is ridiculous. If you are going to take the time to pull a ref over to discuss something you had better know the game first. The important thing about knowing the game is just that. Know what the game is about, how it is played, how it is managed, not how you want to see it handled. Discuss rule interpetation, limit conversation with the refs, simple. It sounds to me like there was nothing to interpet. Player came to the face off late, what is there to discuss? I will take a stab at this one. The ref that booted the kid was the ref that was not conducting the face off, and most likely the accused tainted ref. It also sounds like he was the ref that was making the only calls. Come on tell me I am right. If I am correct he only validated for all of those that were convinced he was throwing the game. It sounds to me from the other poster that this was a physical tournement, with plenty of crap going on from all sides. However, it sounds like you have a loud coach that may be directly influencing his players behavior. Too much yelling and complaining to players and refs, filters down to the players. Players that whine and complain to refs are most likely poorly disaplined players which is a direct reflection of the coach. I would encourage you to take a good look at your team players, coaches and parents collectively. You may have a good dose of reality by going back and watching game footage from a different perspective. Forget about wathcing the immediate play and pay close attention to the audio as well as the after play behavior....When ever you get a chance, watch the coaches behavior, if his arms and hands are flopping in the air the same way a Crappie flops on the bottom of a fishing boat you can bet your bottom dollar is verbally chirping as well.
Blame the ref, it is easy and helps people feel reassured that Johhny is the best and one day will play for the Stanely Cup. He will hoist it only if he is playing in his own rink with his own refs...Ooops..I didn't say that did I? I was just about to wrap up, and suddenly another thought came in my mind. What if your team isn't really that good? What if your team just thinks that they are that good because they have home town refs throwing the game for them. You may be located so far away from civilazation you don't have cell phone coverage...No cell phone, no internet access. No internet access, no E-bay access...

One final though, enjoy the game..
MnPride2
Posts: 240
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:13 am

Post by MnPride2 »

tomASS wrote:
MnPride2 wrote: the other ref was too incompliant to make a call
WHAT??? :-s

Sorry,should be incompetent...
Last edited by MnPride2 on Sat Aug 02, 2008 4:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
MnPride2
Posts: 240
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:13 am

Post by MnPride2 »

"I can only pull from the one kind of vague example of a player getting booted for coming to the face off late. This is real simple, come to the face off late and you are automatically booted, not a homer call at all. GAME MANAGEMENT."

Booted from the face-off,not game,which the younger ref did not know...


"Player came to the face off late, what is there to discuss? I will take a stab at this one. The ref that booted the kid was the ref that was not conducting the face off, and most likely the accused tainted ref."


The fact that the younger ref didn`t/couldn`t make a very simple call tells me he shouldn`t be there,when a coach asks a ref for an explanation the ref should be man enough to come over and explain...which he did not do,instead decided it was time to hand out bench minors.


"However, it sounds like you have a loud coach that may be directly influencing his players behavior."

Actually he was pretty quite until the face-off incident.


"When ever you get a chance, watch the coaches behavior, if his arms and hands are flopping in the air the same way a Crappie flops on the bottom of a fishing boat you can bet your bottom dollar is verbally chirping"

Stood with his arms crossed for the majority of the game...as a matter of fact.


"What if your team just thinks that they are that good because they have home town refs throwing the game for them. You may be located so far away from civilazation you don't have cell phone coverage...No cell phone, no internet access. No internet access, no E-bay access... "


Your a funny guy Jason...

p.s. i`ll watch the game again just to make sure...
hiptzech
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 6:46 am

Post by hiptzech »

That is my point...I understood your example as there was a late player on the ice, thus delaying the face off. It doesn't matter if the center is late getting into the face off, or if the ref is waiting for a player to get into the face off. Late is late, waiting is waiting. The center gets tossed out of the face off. If a player is late and the ref kicks the center out there is nothing to discuss. It is not a matter of manliness, it is a matter of keeping the game going. You talk to one coach, then you need to talk to the other coach. Pretty soon, there are coach and official conversaitions at every other stoppage of play.

Furthermore, refs and coaches don't need to talk nor should they be talking unless there is a close call that needs to be explained. Team captains and the ulternate captians are the only team represenitives that are aloud to have discussions with refs. When that occurs it is to get an understanding of the rule interpataion. My point is this: if the kid was late to the face off, the center gets kicked out. I guess the only interpatation that was needed what does late mean? Players need to be in position and ready for the face off 5 seconds after the whistle is blown.

A timid ref is a bummer to deal with. It puts a lot of pressure on the partner. To say he shouldn't be refing is completely off base. A new ref is a new ref. If there is going to be any conversation between the coach and the refs it should be a conversation with the other ref. If the other ref sucks, then bummer for you and all involved

You don't seem to want to put any responsibility on your coach. Why not? He obviously did not handle the discussion or situation correctly, he ended up getting kicked out of the game, or so it sounds.

It is rediculous to call a ref over to discuss the removal of the center at a face off. I guess I could see it if, the team were one goal down, with a pulled goalie in the defensive end. But then, I would still need to question the judgement of the coach.

He must have been pretty frustrated with how the game was going for whatever reason (players, score, refs) to feel compelled to make an issue out of a simple ejection from the face off.
MnPride2
Posts: 240
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:13 am

Post by MnPride2 »

hiptzech wrote:That is my point...I understood your example as there was a late player on the ice, thus delaying the face off. It doesn't matter if the center is late getting into the face off, or if the ref is waiting for a player to get into the face off. Late is late, waiting is waiting. The center gets tossed out of the face off. If a player is late and the ref kicks the center out there is nothing to discuss. It is not a matter of manliness, it is a matter of keeping the game going. You talk to one coach, then you need to talk to the other coach. Pretty soon, there are coach and official conversaitions at every other stoppage of play.

Furthermore, refs and coaches don't need to talk nor should they be talking unless there is a close call that needs to be explained. Team captains and the ulternate captians are the only team represenitives that are aloud to have discussions with refs. When that occurs it is to get an understanding of the rule interpataion. My point is this: if the kid was late to the face off, the center gets kicked out. I guess the only interpatation that was needed what does late mean? Players need to be in position and ready for the face off 5 seconds after the whistle is blown.

A timid ref is a bummer to deal with. It puts a lot of pressure on the partner. To say he shouldn't be refing is completely off base. A new ref is a new ref. If there is going to be any conversation between the coach and the refs it should be a conversation with the other ref. If the other ref sucks, then bummer for you and all involved

You don't seem to want to put any responsibility on your coach. Why not? He obviously did not handle the discussion or situation correctly, he ended up getting kicked out of the game, or so it sounds.

It is rediculous to call a ref over to discuss the removal of the center at a face off. I guess I could see it if, the team were one goal down, with a pulled goalie in the defensive end. But then, I would still need to question the judgement of the coach.

He must have been pretty frustrated with how the game was going for whatever reason (players, score, refs) to feel compelled to make an issue out of a simple ejection from the face off.

They didn`t "discuss" anything...the ref(young kid) handling the face just stood there and did nothing to the late player(other team),the ref on the blue line had to blow his whistle to remind the youngster what to do...our coach wanted to know why the younger ref had to have the older ref make the call for him...High School level hockey,the refs should know what they are doing. As far as responsibility to our coach...he never got a chance to discuss the issue...neither ref would go and discuss it. It wasn`t so much the removal of the player as it was the younger ref didn`t know what he was suppose to do. Simple call.
hiptzech
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 6:46 am

Post by hiptzech »

Interesting...Couldn't explain, other than ref back to one of my previous posts...Off season refs, it's a crap (no pun intended). Sounds like that is what you got...Sounds like there is more to the story, I thought your kid got tossed, and your coach questioned it. Now it sounds like the other kid got tossed and your coach questioned it, as a result of a senior ref having to handle a rookie ref...
I will go back to my point...Why even question it? When a coach starts asking questions on something as simple as a face off process, with what I will be willing to bet sarcasim the coach is going to find himself in a situation what was completely avoidable. You can work a ref or team of refs, but you need to know how to do it.
I am very confident that there is more to the story, it just doesn't make sense...
I would hate to make the entire board continue to watch this rediculous exchange, so with that I bid you farwell...Good luck with your team and always enjoy the game for what it is....
Post Reply