Vikings in trouble for opening day?

packerboy · Post by **packerboy** » Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:22 pm

Interesting.

I still feelthe pain of all of those losses.

I sat in front of the TV in total disbelief in 1970.

The Steeler game was awful.

The Miami game was bad.

The Raiders game was embarrasing.

Id like to see 1 time the Vikes win that game.

I dont care who the QB is.

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:37 pm

It was hard to get the treat at school to watch NFL films each year after the game, just to re-live those losses, but the 1st three we only managed a total of 20 pts, while giving up 63, and then the Raiders game well........nevermind!

EREmpireStrikesBack · Post by **EREmpireStrikesBack** » Mon Jul 07, 2008 6:22 pm

I'd love to see #4 in a Vikes jersey. He would shore up the only ? mark have. Yes those Packers fans could say it is all because of him, but who would have the ring? He spent how many years with them and only got 1 and comes here and is 1-1. Maybe we'd even bring Randy back

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Mon Jul 07, 2008 7:35 pm

Argggggh! Noooooo!

tomASS · Post by **tomASS** » Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:17 pm

What is Bobby Lee doing now days

and I don't mean our own bored's boblee

Gary Quazzo ?

I just can't see #4 in purple

And I'm with packerboy....just once! Please ! Just so I can give my father-in-law from Buffalo a ton of crap.

OGEE OGELTHORPE · Post by **OGEE OGELTHORPE** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 8:56 am

If Favre did sign with the Vikes it would put a damper on the jersey retiring day they have planned.

September 8 Minnesota @ Green Bay

State Champ 97 · Post by **State Champ 97** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 8:59 am

OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:If Favre did sign with the Vikes it would put a damper on the jersey retiring day they have planned.

September 8 Minnesota @ Green Bay

That would make things interesting.

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 9:13 am

More like sickening..... the whole thought just makes me want to>>>

packerboy · Post by **packerboy** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 9:26 am

Get over it CNT.

We have been OK with ex cheeseheads before.

Should we dump Sharper too?

Skol Brett Farve, Skol!

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 9:33 am

packerboy wrote:Get over it CNT.

We have been OK with ex cheeseheads before.

Should we dump Sharper too?

Skol Brett Farve, Skol!

I don't think he'd come here anyway...PB
This fish is spittin the hook on this deal...nice cast though!

packerboy · Post by **packerboy** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 9:44 am

I dont think the Vikes would want him.

One player doesnt guarantee a Championship,even a HOF QB.

I think they want to develop TJack and see where that takes them. Having him take the year off would make no sense,long term, if they really think he is the QB of the future.

And Brett, make up your boofin mind.

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 9:56 am

packerboy wrote:I dont think the Vikes would want him.

One player doesnt guarantee a Championship,even a HOF QB.

I think they want to develop TJack and see where that takes them. Having him take the year off would make no sense,long term, if they really think he is the QB of the future.

And Brett, make up your boofin mind.

That I completely agree on!

On Tjack he has the tools, he just needs to be cool under pressure, and that comes with experience.
I think we'll see marked improvement in him this year, and just in time... this is the year for us to be a contender..oh that's right we still got Chilly

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:15 am

Can't Never Tried wrote:On Tjack he has the tools...

Since your the expert on tools, I'll agree...

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:48 am

Neutron 14 wrote:
Can't Never Tried wrote:On Tjack he has the tools...
Since your the expert on tools, I'll agree...

Ever wish you would have phrased something differently?

And with you lurking here I should have been more careful.

Govs93 · Post by **Govs93** » Fri Jul 11, 2008 2:56 pm

Here is more fuel for the fire.

UpNorthStars · Post by **UpNorthStars** » Sat Jul 12, 2008 1:20 am

packerboy wrote:I dont think the Vikes would want him.

One player doesnt guarantee a Championship,even a HOF QB.

I think they want to develop TJack and see where that takes them. Having him take the year off would make no sense,long term, if they really think he is the QB of the future.

And Brett, make up your boofin mind.

You're kidding right? It's all about a one year run in the NFL...he'd give the Vikes a legit chance at a ring this year. Plus no one could argue it'd hurt tjack to watch favre for a year.

Govs93 · Post by **Govs93** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 3:01 pm

Whilst suffering through another agonizing Monday at work, I was looking through the Vikes schedule again. Did anybody else pick up on the fact that they have ZERO cold weather games this season? Me likes...

OGEE OGELTHORPE · Post by **OGEE OGELTHORPE** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 3:47 pm

NIce find Sherlock. Usually on Mondays I play Sudoka.

Favre would not like to be a Viking. He's a cold weather QB

EREmpireStrikesBack · Post by **EREmpireStrikesBack** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 6:28 pm

Nice find Govs! Very interesting!

And Favre would work no matter the weather.

sinbin006 · Post by **sinbin006** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 10:53 pm

Good decision on not re-signing him.

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Tue Jul 15, 2008 10:13 am

packerboy wrote:Skol Brett Farve, Skol!

Looks fine to me...

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Tue Jul 15, 2008 10:15 am

Neutron 14 wrote:
packerboy wrote:Skol Brett Farve, Skol!

Looks fine to me...

How do you do that?

Actually it's not funny

no! nat at all!

packerboy · Post by **packerboy** » Tue Jul 15, 2008 11:01 am

UpNorthStars wrote:
packerboy wrote:I dont think the Vikes would want him.

One player doesnt guarantee a Championship,even a HOF QB.

I think they want to develop TJack and see where that takes them. Having him take the year off would make no sense,long term, if they really think he is the QB of the future.

And Brett, make up your boofin mind.
You're kidding right? It's all about a one year run in the NFL...he'd give the Vikes a legit chance at a ring this year. Plus no one could argue it'd hurt tjack to watch favre for a year.

CNT's Farve phobia notwithstanding, I am not kidding. GB and MN seem to want to move to a new player at the position. One that they drafted and have been grooming for it ,long term.

I dont necessarily agree with it , but it looks a lot like thats what both teams want to do and Farve doesnt fit in with their plans.

Farve bugs me but whats with the Packers.

Let Farve go to another team and go with Rogers. Thats what Montana and the 49ers did and it wasnt a big deal.

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Tue Jul 15, 2008 11:22 am

packerboy wrote:
UpNorthStars wrote:
packerboy wrote:I dont think the Vikes would want him.

One player doesnt guarantee a Championship,even a HOF QB.

I think they want to develop TJack and see where that takes them. Having him take the year off would make no sense,long term, if they really think he is the QB of the future.

And Brett, make up your boofin mind.
You're kidding right? It's all about a one year run in the NFL...he'd give the Vikes a legit chance at a ring this year. Plus no one could argue it'd hurt tjack to watch favre for a year.
CNT's Farve phobia notwithstanding, I am not kidding. GB and MN seem to want to move to a new player at the position. One that they drafted and have been grooming for it ,long term.

I dont necessarily agree with it , but it looks a lot like thats what both teams want to do and Farve doesnt fit in with their plans.

Farve bugs me but whats with the Packers.

Let Farve go to another team and go with Rogers. Thats what Montana and the 49ers did and it wasnt a big deal.

My favorite subject

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:46 pm

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=a ... &type=lgns

Boo hoo!!!