According to your illogical opinion, I'm sure that game was much closer than the score or shots indicated... or did the great New Prague team ring the pipes all day again? I'm sure they did and the game should have been running time.TheWittness10 wrote:You have even less intelligence than I anticipated considering you've never quite been able to figure out the difference between 'knew' and 'new'.pats12 wrote:I knew the hit the pipe excuse would be coming. You go ahead and make all the coulda, shoulda woulda comments to make yourself feel better. Those shots have never counted, fyi. If that were the case Breck would have won last night.TheWittness10 wrote: Go ahead and run your little analysis by St. Cloud Apollo too. They beat Breck last night and were outshot 25-14...clearly they didn't play well either? It's referred to as playing defensive hockey.
The EGF-NP game was a 2-goal or less margin up until 3 minutes left in the game...not to mention a couple pipes hit by NP.
Hopefully you're able to get someone to start recording these games for you so you're able to start making intelligent comments versus commenting on final scores.
And to respond to your other comment about NP being no better than NU...final score from this morning NP - 5 NU - 2 with shots ironically 29-17 in favor of NP. So in your own words, that equates to...NU didn't play well, had no chance of winning, and overall poor showing by 3A.
Take a lap pats12
BTW, Mr. English genius, you aren't supposed to start sentences with "and". You and I must be in the same intelligence category.