First, I commend you for having so much passion for a group of kids you don't know and a game that you "happened to stop by for"PondHockeyChampion wrote:I traveled over to the cold and loud Pagel arena to witness the great game between EP and Tonka. It certainly lived up to it's billing and was a fun game to watch. It did not appear it was so much fun for the non-participating girls who rode the bench the entire second period and the entire third except one - two shifts. Is this the mentality of this Coach and a win at all cost attitude? Appears the move-in has taken a lot of valuable playing time from others. After seeing this game unfold, I do see the reason parents move to the privates if they can afford it and their girls wish to participate. If your not a top 6 forward or top 3 D in this system you should definitely look for other opportunities if you can afford it. All the arguments against Marshall seem unfounded when you watch what unfolds here with this Team. If you have a girl who wishes to play, let them play and participate in the big win and have the satisfaction and fun helping their teammates. It is funny how the AD every year stands infront of the parents and talks about participation and the value of sports. If this is the value you are teaching by playing two lines and a win at all costs attitude?
There seems to be lots of accolades towards this Coach and their Team. I saw EP doing the same thing, but not even close to what this Coach's bench shortening starting the second and into the third. I guess if you win State playing 10 girls you should be proud of the way you instilled the values of Teamwork and everyone counts. Has the Coach been successful, absolutely. But does he win the right way and is he respected by all the girls in the program on how he handles questions regarding their roles?
Bash me all you want from all the others on this board, I am sure it will happen with this post, but the attitude by individuals who are supposed to be mentors and leaders is disheartening. What is the message you are sending to the girl who rides the bench? What value and message are you sending that you are not good enough to be on the ice when it is an important game. If they are good enough to be on the Team, they are good enough to play. Will they win State, Probably if they continue to only play 10 girls in sections which I am sure they will do. Bash me all you want, but still disheartening to see girls working really hard not get a chance to shine.
Your next Hero may be the one sitting on the bench, but she never gets the chance to shine. Win as a Team and lose as Team, that is a valuable lesson.
We are now back to the shortening the bench conversation. I often wonder..do these dismayed parents with kids on the 3rd line feel the same way when their kids are playing? What I mean is, when they do get in the game vs lets say an easier opponent, are these same parents fighting for the 4th line kids to play? Or maybe that last kid cut and put on JV? I am guessing once their kids get put on the ice there is no longer any need to go down the depth chart or pining for more playing time for the kid beneath theirs.
It is not fun having your kid have a limited role. However, is there not a listen to be learned in there about things not being easy and working through difficult situations? Sounds like life to me.
I just with people understood, their is always somebody behind somebody behind somebody behind somebody.