"You just can't say no"

Discussion of Minnesota Youth Hockey

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

MrBoDangles
Posts: 4090
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm

Post by MrBoDangles »

SCBlueLiner wrote:
barry_mcconnell wrote:My favorite are the parents that fib about how much their kids are playing during the summer. "Oh little Timmy? He's mostly just going to relax and maybe do a clinic or something." Then you find out little Timmy is playing on three AAA teams and skating full-day camps all summer long.

In most of the metro associations if your kid isn't skating significant summer ice hours he'll fall behind. As a parent you feel like you are letting your kid down if you don't get him those hours. And that feeling is what drives the money into AAA/summer hockey.

Not saying it's right or wrong. But, all things equal, if one kid gets 200 hours of ice over the summer and one doesn't, you'll see a difference in the fall. There are some rare naturally-gifted athletes that are an exception to this of course.
What is the popular consensus as to the "magic number" of hours of summer ice that is considered adequate to keep pace with peers? Obviously this will be based on age. For squirts? For PeeWees? For bantams? For High School?

Just curious.
I would say consistent ice times (even once every week or two) over blocks (1-2 camps) of ice time.

Scale back when your kid doesn't look forward to having practice or a game. THEY need to have the passion for it.
goldy313
Posts: 3949
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2002 11:56 am

Post by goldy313 »

Many of the better studies in overuse in juvenile athletes come from Great Britain, they don't play hockey there though.

There has been a pretty clear correlation drawn between lower back injuries, specifically pars fractures, and overuse in gymnastics and wrestling. Sports with a high rate of hyperextension of the lower back.

At best we're just coming to grips with the long term effects of concussions, specifically repeated concussions. This realization has had an effect on the numbers of kids playing football and probably will end football as we now know it it the next 20 years or less.

My own experiance is one that even if your 8 year old, or pick any age you like, loves hockey....exposing him to other things from music, to baseball, to trap shooting, to cross country, to drama, etc. etc. may expose him to something he may like. pigeonholing a kid into hockey for the fear of "falling behind" is pretty narrow minded and in many eyes equates hockey to reading or math where falling behind can really hurt for a lifetime.
Mite-dad
Posts: 1261
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 9:16 am

Post by Mite-dad »

goldy313 wrote:Many of the better studies in overuse in juvenile athletes come from Great Britain, they don't play hockey there though.

There has been a pretty clear correlation drawn between lower back injuries, specifically pars fractures, and overuse in gymnastics and wrestling. Sports with a high rate of hyperextension of the lower back.

At best we're just coming to grips with the long term effects of concussions, specifically repeated concussions. This realization has had an effect on the numbers of kids playing football and probably will end football as we now know it it the next 20 years or less.

My own experiance is one that even if your 8 year old, or pick any age you like, loves hockey....exposing him to other things from music, to baseball, to trap shooting, to cross country, to drama, etc. etc. may expose him to something he may like. pigeonholing a kid into hockey for the fear of "falling behind" is pretty narrow minded and in many eyes equates hockey to reading or math where falling behind can really hurt for a lifetime.
Are you saying I should take my kids fishing this summer?!
InigoMontoya
Posts: 1716
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:36 pm

Post by InigoMontoya »

Are you saying I should take my kids fishing this summer?!
He's going to have carpal tunnel issues from repetitive casting.
Post Reply