1. Teams are looking at how they believe a player projects in five years. The "experience" stuff is not much of a factor with 18 year olds.BBB wrote:i bet that when the other 29 GMs (who manage teams that do not play in St. Paul) heard Lucia's name called at 60, they thought to themselves, "damn! why didn't we think of that."
Looking at McKenzies rankings, I see he had a kid who tore up the OHL a few spots ahead of Lucia and CSB had the same player 8 spots ahead of Lucia. He went 61st after the Wild took Lucia at 60. Do you think Fletcher and the gang thought about taking a higher ranked, more experienced, kid from Ontario and/or even trading up to do so?
2. Every team is going to have a different draft board. Maybe the Wild had Lucia much higher than the player you mentioned. It is hard to say. Look how much higher Kyle Rau was selected compared to where Central Scouting had him. It isn't all that clear cut and every team is different.
I don't really see how it is much of an advantage to the Wild to trade a few picks in order to land a guy simply because of where he comes from. It's not like that is going to matter a hell of a lot to fans next year or the year after that if the Wild stink.
"God! The Wild suck! But I'm OK with it because they have Mario Lucia in their system." Umm, yeah. I'm sure that will help a lot.
My point in using McKenzie's list (or where Central Scouting had him in North America rankings) is that a lot of scouts liked him at a higher spot than 60 and they could care less about what state he comes from.
