Section Seedings

elliott70 · Post by **elliott70** » Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:20 pm

bloody bar down wrote:
elliott70 wrote:
HShockeywatcher wrote: elliot, what are your thoughts?

I agree, any one of the top 4 could win this, although, I would say the top 3 have a much better shot. All three are pretty equal with a slight edge going to Moorhead. So getting #2 over #3 is huge here.
I thought Roso was the better team, but based on the season I would have put Brainerd at 2nd.
One coach told me that if Bemidji is healthy they have the best shot.
I am not sure if they are entirely healthy but everyone is playing right now.

My money is on Moorhead.
If Bemidji beats Moorhead in the semis (assuming they both make it), then I am with Bemidji.

Brainerd traveling to Roso will be difficult (assuming they both make it).

One coach told me that Bemidji should be a 5 seed. I guess it is all in the eye of the beholder. Bemidji colored glasses there ...Elliott

Not on my part, I pick Moorhead (with my head) (Bemidji with my heart).

GoWild · Post by **GoWild** » Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:09 pm

I'll talk about section 7A and say that Ely got SCREWED. Yes it is the lower half of the seeding and they don't have that great of chance but come on. 2-1 record against Silver Bay and they get seeded above Ely. It is all politics and it should be based solely on records not opinions. Ely gets screwed every year. I also think that Hibbing should have gotten the 2 seed because they beat Virginia in a great game and had other wins. Other than that the seedings were pretty good.

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:39 pm

blueline1 wrote:
You are damn right Brainerd got screwed! There is no justification for this based on the season results. The teams that voted Brainerd the #3 seed have not played them this season, with the exception of Bemidji. Moorhead played both Roseau and Brainerd and their coach ranked Brainerd ahead of Roseau. I guess it doesn't matter what a team accomplishes during the season, a no-name team can't compete with the history of a Roseau, even if they beat them. It's too bad for the kids who earned and deserved to have the opportunity to play the semi's at home.

How do you know who voted how?

"Better" team, in your opinion, or not, the head to head game ended up how it did. A better team would've won. I hope Brainerd makes it to state.

ACTUALFORMERPLAYER · Post by **ACTUALFORMERPLAYER** » Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

HShockeywatcher wrote:
blueline1 wrote:
You are damn right Brainerd got screwed! There is no justification for this based on the season results. The teams that voted Brainerd the #3 seed have not played them this season, with the exception of Bemidji. Moorhead played both Roseau and Brainerd and their coach ranked Brainerd ahead of Roseau. I guess it doesn't matter what a team accomplishes during the season, a no-name team can't compete with the history of a Roseau, even if they beat them. It's too bad for the kids who earned and deserved to have the opportunity to play the semi's at home.
How do you know who voted how?

It's posted on the MSHSL website.

http://www.mshsl.org/mshsl/upload/MSHSL ... 202010.pdf

PASTRAPIDSFAN · Post by **PASTRAPIDSFAN** » Wed Feb 17, 2010 9:15 pm

1 Elk River
2 Duluth East
3 Andover
4 Forest Lake
5 Grand Rapids
6 St. Francis
7 Cambridge
8 Cloquet
9 Princeton

7AA

clutterbuck22 · Post by **clutterbuck22** » Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:00 pm

1AA and 1A meet on Sunday right?

Lucia4President · Post by **Lucia4President** » Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:02 pm

PASTRAPIDSFAN wrote:1 Elk River
2 Duluth East
3 Andover
4 Forest Lake
5 Grand Rapids
6 St. Francis
7 Cambridge
8 Cloquet
9 Princeton

7AA

East got jobbed.

northwoods oldtimer · Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:12 pm

East got jobbed.

No they did not get "jobbed" East lost to the Elks 3-2 that is head to head which puts East at 2. It did not have to go any further than that in running the comparison between Elks and East.

Lucia4President · Post by **Lucia4President** » Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:16 pm

northwoods oldtimer wrote:
East got jobbed.
No they did not get "jobbed" East lost to the Elks 3-2 that is head to head which puts East at 2. It did not have to go any further than that in running the comparison between Elks and East.

Sarcasm must have skipped your generation.

mulefarm · Post by **mulefarm** » Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:17 pm

Then why did roso get seeded higher than brainerd?

Lucia4President · Post by **Lucia4President** » Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:19 pm

mulefarm wrote:Then why did roso get seeded higher than brainerd?

ryno44 · Post by **ryno44** » Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:19 pm

Hibbing got the ROYAL screw job!!!! Hibbing beat and lost to Virginia. IFalls lost and tied them. Doesn't make a difference just don't see how they get 3rd.

defense · Post by **defense** » Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:48 pm

Brainerd didn't get what they deserved.
Brainerd will just have to go to Roseau and beat the Rams there then. This is what happens come playoff time. If Brainerd stands a chance to win the section, they will have to win some tough games....so be it.

Nodak Sioux · Post by **Nodak Sioux** » Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:03 am

ACTUALFORMERPLAYER wrote:
HShockeywatcher wrote:
blueline1 wrote:
You are damn right Brainerd got screwed! There is no justification for this based on the season results. The teams that voted Brainerd the #3 seed have not played them this season, with the exception of Bemidji. Moorhead played both Roseau and Brainerd and their coach ranked Brainerd ahead of Roseau. I guess it doesn't matter what a team accomplishes during the season, a no-name team can't compete with the history of a Roseau, even if they beat them. It's too bad for the kids who earned and deserved to have the opportunity to play the semi's at home.
How do you know who voted how?
It's posted on the MSHSL website.

http://www.mshsl.org/mshsl/upload/MSHSL ... 202010.pdf

Are you able to find this for each section? and if so where exactly do you find it on MSHSL website?

mnhockeynemn · Post by **mnhockeynemn** » Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:51 am

ryno44 wrote:Hibbing got the ROYAL screw job!!!! Hibbing beat and lost to Virginia. IFalls lost and tied them. Doesn't make a difference just don't see how they get 3rd.

So if it doesn't make a difference then they are you being such a poor sport about it? Talk about a sore loser. This wasn't one person's decision, it was a groups decision. It might have something to do with Hibbing losing to Duluth Marshall. Calm down. take a breath.

I suppose this could be the refs fault too??

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:36 am

mnhockeynemn wrote:
ryno44 wrote:Hibbing got the ROYAL screw job!!!! Hibbing beat and lost to Virginia. IFalls lost and tied them. Doesn't make a difference just don't see how they get 3rd.

So if it doesn't make a difference then they are you being such a poor sport about it? Talk about a sore loser. This wasn't one person's decision, it was a groups decision. It might have something to do with Hibbing losing to Duluth Marshall. Calm down. take a breath. I suppose this could be the refs fault too??

They're probably right where they should be.
Hibbing is 1-1 against both Virginia and Int Falls but lost to Marshall.
Int Falls is 1-1 against Hibbing, 1-0-1 against Virginia, and didn't play Marshall.
Virginia is 1-1 against Hibbing, 1-0-1 against Int Falls and beat Marshall.

Really, I'd say they're lucky to be #3.

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:35 pm

Any news on when the next section meetings are?

Eagles93 · Post by **Eagles93** » Thu Feb 18, 2010 1:07 pm

bauerhky22 wrote:Just curious if the guy who usually makes "the board" with all the sections all the way up to the state tournament is doing it again this year? I am sure they are. Can't wait to defend my title with my buddies as we usually fill the whole thing out while placing bets!

They're up.

http://brackets.ahaphantoms.com/

Post by **karl(east)** » Thu Feb 18, 2010 1:47 pm

Eagles93 wrote:
bauerhky22 wrote:Just curious if the guy who usually makes "the board" with all the sections all the way up to the state tournament is doing it again this year? I am sure they are. Can't wait to defend my title with my buddies as we usually fill the whole thing out while placing bets!
They're up.

http://brackets.ahaphantoms.com/

The 5AA bracket you've got there is last year's (they still haven't taken it down).

greatone · Post by **greatone** » Thu Feb 18, 2010 2:27 pm

Is anyone going to head up the pick 8 game for A and AA. I think O-town Clown had something to do with it last year?

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:27 am

Nodak Sioux wrote:
ACTUALFORMERPLAYER wrote:
HShockeywatcher wrote: How do you know who voted how?
It's posted on the MSHSL website.

http://www.mshsl.org/mshsl/upload/MSHSL ... 202010.pdf
Are you able to find this for each section? and if so where exactly do you find it on MSHSL website?

MNHockey75 · Post by **MNHockey75** » Sun Feb 21, 2010 12:24 pm

2AA:
1. Edina
2. Burnsville
3. Jefferson
4. Holy Angels
5. Chaska
6. Prior Lake
7. Shakopee
8. Kennedy

6AA:
1. Minnetonka
2. Wayzata
3. Eden Prairie
4. Benilde
5. Hopkins
6. Armstrong
7. Minn. East
8. Cooper
9. Minn. West

greyhoundsnation27 · Post by **greyhoundsnation27** » Sun Feb 21, 2010 1:02 pm

3AA

1. Eagan
2. Cretin-Derham Hall
3. Woodbury
4. Apple Valley
5. Hastings
6. Park
7. Eastview
8. Henry Sibley
9. Rosemount

stpaul · Post by **stpaul** » Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:07 pm

4AA

1. Hill-Murray 22-2-1
2. White Bear Lake 15-9-1
3. Stillwater 14-9-2
4. Tartan 15-9-1
5. Mounds View 11-12-2
6. North St. Paul 14-11
7. Roseville 7-17-1
8. SP Como Park 10-14-1
9. SP Saints 4-21

MNHockey75 · Post by **MNHockey75** » Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:38 pm

4A:
1. Saint Thomas Academy
2. Mahtomedi
3. Totino-Grace
4. Spring Lake Park
5. South St. Paul
6. St. Paul Johnson
7. Chisago Lakes
8. Minnehaha Academy
9. East Ridge
10. St. Paul Academy
11. Simley

2A:
1. Breck
2. Delano
3. Blake
4. Orono
5. Mound-Westonka
6. Providence Academy
7. Holy Family Catholic
8. St. Louis Park
9. Richfield
10. Waconia

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Section Seedings

NO

Re: NO

4AA