Burnsville vs Hill 11/28

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Prediction

Poll ended at Sun Nov 29, 2009 9:23 pm

Burnsville
9
41%
Hill Murray
13
59%
 
Total votes: 22

Goldfishdude
Posts: 1596
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:41 pm

Post by Goldfishdude »

Are you sure about that wbmd?? Well, then maybe I got screwed up.... Because Hill was the home team yesterday and occupied the east bench. WBL's student section is always on the west end.

I can't remember what I did yesterday, let alone what it was like yesterday.

It's just that like in Marriucci, the main student section is on the end behind the visitor's net to go nuts when goals are scored.. Isn't that what it is designed for??? Then maybe it's because the WBL students are on "performance enhancing meds". and neet to be closer to the concession stand for when the urge of munchies comes along... :lol:

PS. I hope the athletic director and superintendent don't read these forums!!! :twisted:
Goldfishdude
Posts: 1596
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:41 pm

Post by Goldfishdude »

Yes, wbmd..... as proof, I kneel before you in your wealth of knowledge and expertise as I stand corrected....
wblhockeyfan8
Posts: 839
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:37 pm
Location: White Bear Lake, MN. Front row of the student section.

Post by wblhockeyfan8 »

wbmd wrote:
Goldfishdude wrote:As a member of Hill's arch enemy to the north, I was happy to see Hill's student section make some effort.

However, they need to learn one basic rule:

The student section needs to be on the end of the opposing goalie twice to jump all over the team, and the goalie.

There would have been nothing better than to see the 300 students all get up at one time and just make a mad dash to the opposite end across from the Burnsville section.
Interesting you say that since White Bears student section is always at the opposing goalie only once in the game.
We like to shout words of encouragement...? :roll:
hockeyhockeyhockey
Posts: 249
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 1:44 pm

Post by hockeyhockeyhockey »

a game that was basically ruined by the refs...just horrible Hill was full strength in the first period maybe 8 minutes. B Ville powerplay was not good....

in the second burnsville was full strength maybe 6 minutes..

there were at least 7 penalties that I could not come close to seeing as a real infraciton of any kind..sometime you miss a call here and there this was beyond description....players and fans and coaches totally frustrated at this..this was not a chippy game at all..there was no barking..on time a B ville player did a bad move and checked from behind and got the 2 min plus a 10..that was the only chippy thing at all and yet so many minors called...

some sort of contact to the head call??? it was really bad..so its hard to say what each team has...no injuries..Bahe for Hill is crafty..B Ville seems to be more of a team than the strange team last year with a couple jerk senior hotheads...they have some shot at improving..

best momentof the game was this strange play in the 3rd hill in control up big ...... The pioneers easily get the puck to clear out of the zone..it hits the REF (who had a brutal game) and this puck just goes directly to B ville #15 right in front of the Hill and he shoots in a a free goal............everyone was stunned.......then the HM students cheer Merry Christmas..clap clap clapclapclap Merry christmas... good stuff...
GreekChurch
Posts: 169
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:12 pm

Post by GreekChurch »

You saw exactly the same game as I did - I agree totally with your take on the game.
Doglover
Posts: 550
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:54 pm

Post by Doglover »

Yup that sums it up! Way too many penalty calls but some good moments by both teams. I thought Cotroneo on Hill looked good as did Mossey on Burnsville.
Post Reply