Instant Replay
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 9:15 pm
Any goalie will tell you that if he is in the crease, he is interferring.
I dont like instant replay for anything.
The usual justification for it is that: "we want to get it right"
You never can "get it right" unless you replay everything. So you allow the goal because repaly shows it crossed the line but what do you do about the fact the the whole play was off sides in the first place?
Its the same in football. The pass interferce call that wasnt, holding gets missed, etc etc but let's replay whether the ball is spotted properly so we can "get it right"
I think its stupid.
PS. Replay really sucks when you are at the game.
I dont like instant replay for anything.
The usual justification for it is that: "we want to get it right"
You never can "get it right" unless you replay everything. So you allow the goal because repaly shows it crossed the line but what do you do about the fact the the whole play was off sides in the first place?
Its the same in football. The pass interferce call that wasnt, holding gets missed, etc etc but let's replay whether the ball is spotted properly so we can "get it right"
I think its stupid.
PS. Replay really sucks when you are at the game.
packerboy wrote:Any goalie will tell you that if he is in the crease, he is interferring.
I dont like instant replay for anything.
The usual justification for it is that: "we want to get it right"
You never can "get it right" unless you replay everything. So you allow the goal because repaly shows it crossed the line but what do you do about the fact the the whole play was off sides in the first place?
I think its stupid.
PS. Replay really sucks when you are at the game.
On most of those goals awarded or waved off, the refs did or should have got right from the beginning.
But PB is right. When you are at the game and they stop for commercials and now the refs stop it because they do not want to be the one that made the wrong call, it drags out what should be the fastest game in the world. And of course they will not show re-plays to the people at the rink.
We get a blank screen.
MSHSL needs to keep in mind the 17,000 people sitting in the rink at $10 per or whatever my son had to pay for me.
-
- Posts: 3013
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:31 pm
elliott70 wrote:Very true it sucked at the gamepackerboy wrote:Any goalie will tell you that if he is in the crease, he is interferring.
I dont like instant replay for anything.
The usual justification for it is that: "we want to get it right"
You never can "get it right" unless you replay everything. So you allow the goal because repaly shows it crossed the line but what do you do about the fact the the whole play was off sides in the first place?
I think its stupid.
PS. Replay really sucks when you are at the game.
On most of those goals awarded or waved off, the refs did or should have got right from the beginning.
But PB is right. When you are at the game and they stop for commercials and now the refs stop it because they do not want to be the one that made the wrong call, it drags out what should be the fastest game in the world. And of course they will not show re-plays to the people at the rink.
We get a blank screen.
MSHSL needs to keep in mind the 17,000 people sitting in the rink at $10 per or whatever my son had to pay for me.