HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:45 pm**

On this match-up, I'm going to go with...

Hill Murray - 3
Richfield - 1

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:07 am**

richfield-3
hill murray-0

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:36 am**

Where in the quote does it say I predicted a St Thomas victory? It doesn't. I was standing up for them and being hopeful about the turnout, but when I voted I voted for Hill because I thought they'd win. Doesn't it make the most sense to vote for the team you think is going to win, rather than the team you want to win? Just the opposite of putting someone in office, there you vote for who you want to win, not who you think will win.

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2007 4:54 pm**

HShockeywatcher wrote:Where in the quote does it say I predicted a St Thomas victory? It doesn't.

HShockeywatcher wrote:
St Thomas 7 (empty netter)
Hill Murray 5

HShockeywatcher wrote:I was standing up for them and being hopeful about the turnout, but when I voted I voted for Hill because I thought they'd win. Doesn't it make the most sense to vote for the team you want to win, rather than the team you think is going to win?

You have me just a tad confused. So you are saying that since you voted for H-M, you wanted H-M to win? Because I'm sure you meant STA...

Sorry, not trying to cut down on you, but just trying to get the facts straight..

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:29 pm**

I voted for Hill Murray to win because I thought they would, but I predicted what I wanted to happen. I wanted it to be a high scoring game, like both were last year and for St Thomas to win.

This Richfield game I voted for Hill Murray because I think they will win. However, I want Richfield to win.

anything you still don't understand?

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2007 6:46 pm**

The quote I showed had you saying "Doesn't it make the most sense to vote for the team you want to win".

This Richfield game I voted for Hill Murray because I think they will win. However, I want Richfield to win.

That's what I've been talking about. Why not vote for them then if you want them to win?

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2007 6:55 pm**

My bad. I fixed it to say what I meant it to say. After it I typed what was the opposite of what I meant, but yeah, what I said could've been confusing.

I vote for the team I think is going to win and in the thread I discuss and such hoping the team I want to win wins.

Just like last year I'm pretty sure I voted for Marshall to win the final, however, I was in the stands cheering for St Thomas.

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2007 7:33 pm**

HShockeywatcher wrote:My bad. I fixed it to say what I meant it to say. After it I typed what was the opposite of what I meant, but yeah, what I said could've been confusing.

I vote for the team I think is going to win and in the thread I discuss and such hoping the team I want to win wins.

Just like last year I'm pretty sure I voted for Marshall to win the final, however, I was in the stands cheering for St Thomas.

I just vote for Hill-Murray everytime, that way I don't have to go through complicated thought scenarios like you...

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2007 7:38 pm**

I just vote for them unless they are playing Holy Angels every time too.

It's not complicating, he was just making it more so by not understanding why I wouldn't vote for the team I wanted to win.

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2007 7:55 pm**

HShockeywatcher wrote:My bad. I typed what was the opposite of what I meant, but yeah, what I said could've been confusing.

THE ABOVE DISCLAIMER SHOULD ACCOMPANY EVERY BAT-MITE POST.

Humorous... the same people predicting Hill will not prepare and play hard enough to defeat the Spartans are the very same people who will call Hill "shameful" for playing too well and scoring often!

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2007 7:56 pm**

All cleared up..my bad for dragging it along but I just got slightly confused at what you were trying to say...

Well how about we go back to the game. With the talk on the board, it seems as though Richfield has seen new life with their goalie back. It'll be interesting to see how he (and the team) holds up come Saturday.

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2007 8:15 pm**

Yeah, I agree. Hill is good, but there are so many people on here from there standing up for them and saying they are so good. And when they lose AP just says they'll win next time and doesn't change his tone. I'm not saying it's going to happen, just interested in seeing what they all say if Richfield wins.

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:19 pm**

HShockeywatcher wrote:just interested in seeing what they all say if Richfield wins.

AP would say, "Bat-mite! Get us out of this weird fifth dimension and back to the REAL world!"

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:21 pm**

Ankles Pierre, Jr. wrote:
HShockeywatcher wrote:just interested in seeing what they all say if Richfield wins.
AP would say, "Bat-mite! Get us out of this weird fifth dimension and back to the REAL world!"

ok now I want to see that happen. Do you always refer to yourself as AP?

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:21 pm**

Well even AP will agree he stands behind his beloved Larsoneers no matter what happens. He will still rant and rave after their loss to richfield and he will rant and rave after they lose to M

rhead and he will continue his rantings and ravings after hill fails to win state.

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:23 pm**

Bash Brother wrote:Well even AP will agree he stands behind his beloved Larsoneers no matter what happens. He will still rant and rave after their loss to richfield and he will rant and rave after they lose to M rhead and he will continue his rantings and ravings after hill fails to win state.

For the 16th year in a row

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:24 pm**

dherman8 wrote:
Bash Brother wrote:Well even AP will agree he stands behind his beloved Larsoneers no matter what happens. He will still rant and rave after their loss to richfield and he will rant and rave after they lose to M rhead and he will continue his rantings and ravings after hill fails to win state.
For the 16th year in a row

Good addition. Can't believe i forgot to add that.

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:28 pm**

Just great... now Bizarro and Mr. Mxyzptlk are joining forces against AP, too!

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:28 pm**

Bash Brother wrote:
dherman8 wrote:
Bash Brother wrote:Well even AP will agree he stands behind his beloved Larsoneers no matter what happens. He will still rant and rave after their loss to richfield and he will rant and rave after they lose to M rhead and he will continue his rantings and ravings after hill fails to win state.
For the 16th year in a row
Good addition. Can't believe i forgot to add that.

I got your back. Especially when AP is involved. $\:D/$

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:29 pm**

AP cant take on Bash Brother and King dherman

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:30 pm**

Ankles Pierre, Jr. wrote:Just great... now Bizarro and Mr. Mxyzptlk are joining forces against AP, too!

Which one am I. Hey AP, what are you going to say when Moorhead thrashes your beloved Pioneers. There is always next year.

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:30 pm**

Bash Brother wrote:AP cant take on Bash Brother and King dherman

Now you are talking

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:37 pm**

dherman8 wrote:
Ankles Pierre, Jr. wrote:Just great... now Bizarro and Mr. Mxyzptlk are joining forces against AP, too!
Which one Me am?

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:41 pm**

Ankles Pierre, Jr. wrote:
dherman8 wrote:
Ankles Pierre, Jr. wrote:Just great... now Bizarro and Mr. Mxyzptlk are joining forces against AP, too!
Which one Me am?

What was that?

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:51 pm**

dherman8 wrote:What was that?

...what m00rhead and Richfield will say after Hill rolls over them.

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Hill Murray Pioneers @ Richfield Spartans 2-3-07

richfield vs hill murray