I don't buy that at all. I think that the USHL and the NTDP will always claim some of the best of the best, but those are only going to be players who are actually good enough to compete against 20 year-olds. That will always be a limited amount of players, because there are a limited amount of opportunities.flatontheice wrote:I am a huge fan of Minnesota High School Hockey but the writing is on the wall. The fact is that AAA midget kids are much more prepared for the next level of competition. (8-9 month season, 60+ games, full time training, great coaching). The Elite league made an attempt to circumvent this but the league has become diluted and the quality of hockey diminishing...kind of a free for all. A jump above high school hockey but not comparable to AAA midgets. I am afraid that unless systemic changes are made to the high school model, high school hockey on a national level is falling way behind.
If you're talking about HS falling behind AAA, I don't agree. Top HS teams from MN have recently been competitive with Shattuck Prep, which is considered one of the best AAA Midget Major teams in the world. IMHO, last year's Edina team (with freshmen and sophmores) would have beaten Belle Tire (without fresheman or sophmores) in a best of seven series. Many of you won't agree, but I'm looking for some backup from the Edina fans (and maybe even Gopher Blog?)
Of course, on a school by school basis I don't doubt that you assertions are true. Matt Hansen made the right decision to get out of that situation at St. Cloud Tech. Hopefully they can turn it around up there.