Re: I agree.
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 9:22 am
Correction Lake - The above was the match up only for the first period. The Gardiner-Frawley-Coatta line was too dominant and scored a goal in the first period. As a result coach Lee Smith matched Rau-Rogge's line against Gardiner's line in the second and third. This didn't work either and actually backfired since Gardiner's line continued to dominate and scored two goals in third and worse, it freed up Tonka's second line with Schutt-Lundquist-Thornberg who then scored two goals.Lakeviewing wrote:Tonka was the stonger team here. EP looked young and not able to handle Tonka's physical play. Tonka's goalies was letting some big rebounds that EP didn't get any chances to score upon. EP has a number of juniors playing and their senior players just didn't step up and score. Unlike last year, EP had a 1st line that didn't give up goals against other 1st line teams and rolled Rau, Rogge and Wolf against other 2nd lines and scored goals. Tonka played this same method having the Max G. against EP's second line. I think EP's 2nd line gave at least four goals. Tonka is graduating four D1 players. Look for EP next year as I think the Lake and Section 6 will be down, except for Wayzata.
Doglover wrote:Minnetonka looked like men out there and EP looked like little boys. Kind of disappointing - I thought it would be closer. Congrats to Tonka. Wouldn't want to be the poor team that gets drawn to play them in quarters.
Now you got the facts... You may want to try watching the game on the internet... like I do...
After watching STA (who I think has some of the best forwards in the state... no homie comment intended...

