This really shouldn't be big news to anyone on this board, but school visits take place all of the time during a high school hockey season. Most go on quietly, and no one cares, and why should they. There are lots of good reasons these visits could be necessary during a season. Thus the reason the MSHSL expressly allows these to take place during the HS season.puck81 wrote:That's what's wrong with this country today Bruins. No consequences for your actions. I dont care if your a 9th grader, a 12th grader or an adult. Personal behavior has consequences. Leaving your team and missing practice is NOT having a "chat" with another team. You want to shop your services around have at it, when the current season is over.Bruins wrote:Wow!!! what a great life lesson for a ninth grader. Kick him off the team! Lesson learned. If other teams want to chat with you keep quiet or be terminated. Very sad state in the "state of hockey".
It has been confirmed that BSM has no stated or written policy preventing such visits that the family violated.
So what is left, Precedent? ...BSM had several players attend NCAA programs this season. At least one of these involved a missed practice. There was no consequence. Last year, at least one BSM player made a visit to a USHL program, and sounds like he was dishonest about it to his coach to boot. There was no consequence.
Did the player/family know of the consequences? It is clear there was a warning. But what I have been told is there were several sort of emotionally charged "veiled" threats, in the spirit of "there will be consequences." The family has made it known that they would never of taken this trip had they known this would happen - they are devasted. And from what it sounds, Coach Pauly has yet to have a conversation with the parents. Not in an attempt to understand the threatened consequence, not after hearing their son was cut from the team from teammates and on Twitter...or since. And a meeting would not granted, because the decision was "final."
Did this Coach have an arguement with his wife that morning, and then decide...I think I'll cut that kid for not responding to my veiled threats. - I would hope we could all agree that that would be wrong. And if this decision was not backed by any written rule or policy, or a verbal communication the coach had had prior with his team, that applied to all... then I believe you are giving a HS coach a frightening amount of unchecked power.
And if this is the case, then we are witnessing a great abuse of power, and IMO, with the precedent, a pretty clear-cut case of discrimination.