Tonka Vs. Benilde

MNHockeyFan · Post by **MNHockeyFan** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:12 pm

Slap Shot wrote:If you were at the game you'd have seen which team had the better chances overall. Tonka just never figured out they needed to go high because the BSM keep was great with his pads low. I just don't understand why they went into a prevent mode in the 3rd instead of going for the jugular.

Maybe the Skippers didn't purposely go into "prevent mode", but rather BSM started playing like they are capable of playing and just took it to Tonka.

he_shoots-he_scores · Post by **he_shoots-he_scores** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:14 pm

Before we take away Mike Lee's Vesina trophy, Lets see how Mr. Meyers handles his first capacity crowd at the X, little was mentioned of EP's five goal performance just a game ago.

Meyers is Pauly's hand picked goalie, and it has been embarrassing to watch how he not allowed Meyers and Shibrowski's to compete on fair basis this year. Come Tourney time I would go with the maturity and poise factor of Shibrowski vs the overly confident Sophy. But its just my two cents. Best of Luck Red Knights.

You know nothing about the goalie situation at BSM. So please don't speak of that which you do not know. BSM has 3 goalies all of which could be starters at most any other team in the state. And all 3 had the opportunity to showcase their talents. Ankeny played against Hill Murray and tonka (the first game). Shibrowski played against Stillwater and a number of other conference games and all played in some JV games. The rotation was such that people where wondering when it would end. It did when Meyer stood on his head against Shattuck. I think Pauly felt Meyer was the best of the 3 from the beginning but he still made him proof it and I think most would say he did.

who_b_dat · Post by **who_b_dat** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:26 pm

he_shoots-he_scores wrote:I think Pauly felt Meyer was the best of the 3 from the beginning but he still made him prove it and I think most would say he did.

+1 The kid played GREAT last night. Anything else said about him is sour grapes.

DadsMoney · Post by **DadsMoney** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:32 pm

MNHockeyFan wrote:
Slap Shot wrote:If you were at the game you'd have seen which team had the better chances overall. Tonka just never figured out they needed to go high because the BSM keep was great with his pads low. I just don't understand why they went into a prevent mode in the 3rd instead of going for the jugular.
Maybe the Skippers didn't purposely go into "prevent mode", but rather BSM started playing like they are capable of playing and just took it to Tonka.

I would say a combination of both. Tonka looked a lot like Jefferson last week against Burnsville in the third period.

Slap Shot · Post by **Slap Shot** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:25 pm

MNHockeyFan wrote:
Slap Shot wrote:If you were at the game you'd have seen which team had the better chances overall. Tonka just never figured out they needed to go high because the BSM keep was great with his pads low. I just don't understand why they went into a prevent mode in the 3rd instead of going for the jugular.
Maybe the Skippers didn't purposely go into "prevent mode"....

Obviously BSM played a part but I think anyone that's seen both teams play more than 5 times each would note the same - that MHS played not to lose in the 3rd.

formerlybackofnet · Post by **formerlybackofnet** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:28 pm

Tonka was only playing 4 defensemen, on that big sheet they were getting plenty winded by the 3rd period.

hockeywatcher4 · Post by **hockeywatcher4** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:29 pm

All 3 goalies are capable and i wouldnt be surprised to see one of the other 2 playin at least one of the games at the x

hockeywatcher4 · Post by **hockeywatcher4** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:32 pm

Mike Shibrowski 1.179 Rob Ankeny 1.600
Jacob Meyers 1.798
suprising if you ask me meyers has the worst gaa

zrock222 · Post by **zrock222** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:45 pm

This game for me took time to develop, the first period was a little slow and sluggish as it seemed like the teams were just trying to get a feel for the ice and atmosphere, however i enjoyed the game from the second period on. It seemed as if BSM just left alot of gas in the tank for themselves in the third as they controled most if the period. You just got the sense that they would score and take it into overtime. all in all a very good game to watch, i would of liked to see tonka pull it out but congrats to BSM.

hockeyxprt1 · Post by **hockeyxprt1** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:54 pm

hockeywatcher4 wrote:Mike Shibrowski 1.179 Rob Ankeny 1.600
Jacob Meyers 1.798
suprising if you ask me meyers has the worst gaa

You may want to look at the opponents in generating that GAA, particularly for Shibrowski. Meyers will start every game going forward. No goalie controversy, Meyers is simply the best goalie at BSM.

hockeywatcher4 · Post by **hockeywatcher4** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 5:13 pm

hockeyxprt1 wrote:
hockeywatcher4 wrote:Mike Shibrowski 1.179 Rob Ankeny 1.600
Jacob Meyers 1.798
suprising if you ask me meyers has the worst gaa
You may want to look at the opponents in generating that GAA, particularly for Shibrowski. Meyers will start every game going forward. No goalie controversy, Meyers is simply the best goalie at BSM.

ankeny played against hill and tonka

marchmadness · Post by **marchmadness** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 5:16 pm

congrats to 6aa for playing such a competitive tournament this year. 4 overtime games including both semis and the championship. nice job boys. gave us something exciting to watch. gotta love section time in minnesota.

ColdasIce · Post by **ColdasIce** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 5:36 pm

John Gardner must be going nuts today, keeping his son"home" to play with Max and then to lose it all. Jake had a great year, needs to decide which postion he should play, sounds like he needed to PLAY DEFENSE, yet continues the offensive show. Cost him last night.

Tigers33 · Post by **Tigers33** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 6:28 pm

The only reason this was a good game was because it went into overtime. I thought BSM looked sluggish, slow, and unmotivated until the third period. I think it was their gameplan to put Tonka to sleep and than come out fired up in the third.

Also, if #18 is going to UMASS...It seemed like #14 was out there in the critical and key moments of the game.

This game was average...Edina - Burnsville was an outstanding game! The second best I have ever seen, next to East-Apple Valley.

hockeywatcher4 · Post by **hockeywatcher4** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:08 pm

ColdasIce wrote:John Gardner must be going nuts today, keeping his son"home" to play with Max and then to lose it all. Jake had a great year, needs to decide which postion he should play, sounds like he needed to PLAY DEFENSE, yet continues the offensive show. Cost him last night.

What do you mean stayed home?

Svenster · Post by **Svenster** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:12 pm

The game last night was great. Typical HS playoff hockey energy at Mariucci.

The Red Knights played with HEART all night long (despite a less than stellar second period).

Too bad that Tonka will not be at the Big Dance but B-SM deserves to be there.

hockeydude42 · Post by **hockeydude42** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:37 pm

Sparlimb wrote: Meyers was, without doubt, the reason BSM won. He stood on his head an played a fantstic game. He was the best goaltender of the four I saw last night.

I disagree here. I thought the best of the 4 goalies we saw was definitely the Burnsville goalie. Don't get me wrong, I thought Meyers played great too and made some nice saves. But that Burnsville goalie played outstanding and is the main reason Burnsville almost pulled off the upset. He made some great saves during regulation and overtime and really seemed solid in that net controlling all his rebounds. Anybody know his name and what he's doing for hockey after high school?

MNHockey75 · Post by **MNHockey75** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:49 pm

A great game, especially the first and third periods. If there is one thing I took from this game was...Jake Gardiner, WOW. Wisconsin got themselves a player. The only reason BSM won the game was the below average play of there goalie. I haven't seen them play before this game but is Buonomo there starting goalie? He looked really shaky and BSM's goalie did not. This was a great game and apart of one of the best double headers ever.

natedog228 · Post by **natedog228** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 9:01 pm

MNHockey75 wrote:A great game, especially the first and third periods. If there is one thing I took from this game was...Jake Gardiner, WOW. Wisconsin got themselves a player. The only reason BSM won the game was the below average play of there goalie. I haven't seen them play before this game but is Buonomo there starting goalie? He looked really shaky and BSM's goalie did not. This was a great game and apart of one of the best double headers ever.

I'll go a step further and say this was the best double header ever, state or section game. Benilde's goalie makes them a contender. I always seem to find that one player that I just despise at the state tournament... #12 from Benilde is that player this year. Kids a hack.

Tigers33 · Post by **Tigers33** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 9:18 pm

I would agree #12 was a hack. I would pick #23 to dislike.

hockeywatcher4 · Post by **hockeywatcher4** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 9:22 pm

hockeydude42 wrote:
Sparlimb wrote: Meyers was, without doubt, the reason BSM won. He stood on his head an played a fantstic game. He was the best goaltender of the four I saw last night.
I disagree here. I thought the best of the 4 goalies we saw was definitely the Burnsville goalie. Don't get me wrong, I thought Meyers played great too and made some nice saves. But that Burnsville goalie played outstanding and is the main reason Burnsville almost pulled off the upset. He made some great saves during regulation and overtime and really seemed solid in that net controlling all his rebounds. Anybody know his name and what he's doing for hockey after high school?

HIS NAME IS MIKEAL BECKER

Roseauverrated · Post by **Roseauverrated** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 9:34 pm

Tigers33 wrote: Also, if #18 is going to UMASS...It seemed like #14 was out there in the critical and key moments of the game.

#14 is Nate Jensen. He's a very underrated player and I think is their best defensive defenseman. I hope he's getting some good looks from coaches because I'd like to see him play for a big school someday.

MNHockeyFan · Post by **MNHockeyFan** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 10:33 pm

deleted - double post

MNHockeyFan · Post by **MNHockeyFan** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 10:33 pm

Slap Shot wrote:
MNHockeyFan wrote:
Slap Shot wrote:If you were at the game you'd have seen which team had the better chances overall. Tonka just never figured out they needed to go high because the BSM keep was great with his pads low. I just don't understand why they went into a prevent mode in the 3rd instead of going for the jugular.
Maybe the Skippers didn't purposely go into "prevent mode"....
Obviously BSM played a part but I think anyone that's seen both teams play more than 5 times each would note the same - that MHS played not to lose in the 3rd.

Slap Shot, are you saying Minnetonka purposely went into a defensive shell of sorts and just wanted to play defense in the 3rd? If this was orchestrated by the coach it obviously backfired on them.

UNDhockeyfan · Post by **UNDhockeyfan** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 10:36 pm

Minnetonka deserved to win last night (and I am not a Skippers fan). Gardiner fired a shot at the end of the second period that went in and off the rail and back out as fast as it went in. No one seemed to realize he scored. It would have made it 3-0 and left Benilde's come back one short. What a terrible way to lose when officials miss a goal!

Gardiner is the real deal in every aspect of his play. I still can't believe no one even asked for a review or talked about it.
IT WAS CLEARLY IN, I had a great angle on it and so did those around me. We were dumbfounded.

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Tonka Vs. Benilde

who u think will win Tonka or Benilde

Re: At least the privates don't act like they expect it

Re: At least the privates don't act like they expect it

Re: At least the privates don't act like they expect it

6AA

Re: At least the privates don't act like they expect it

Re: At least the privates don't act like they expect it