HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

17's http://www.minnesotahockey.org/page/show/1825591-girls-hp-17-national-camp-selectees 16's http://www.minnesotahockey.org/page/show/799515-girls-hp-16-national-camp-selectees How is bullock not on this list? The USA hockey model is looking for hard forechecking, fierce back checking, smooth pas...

I would love for my esteemed columnists to look into their Crystal Ball and predict the Top 10 rankings for A and AA at the end of next regular season, not after the state tournament.

Test your knowledge on strength of programs and returning players. We will then know who the real Swammy is!

Combined scores for winning vs losing teams in the first round was 39-5. Looks like you can fire up that discussion for section realignment again.

Bulldog3489 wrote:This is a problem with Blake's athletic director not the tournament. No small town is going to have four or five division 1 hockey players on the same team. The high school league should encourage Blake to do the right thing and move up the next couple of years.

So it's Blake's fault?

jg2112 wrote:

Sartellcelly wrote:http://www.startribune.com/video/292122581.html#hpmfv

good choices? let's hear from folk.

Where is Carly Bullock?

It is the all metro top 5 hockey players, not scorers, HUGE difference!

Not 100% sure but were all AA section finals decided in the third period or overtime? I also understand that most (all?) were played in front of packed houses. Hard to top that. I think if the school league dropped geography and just focused on getting the truly best teams from state you would see ...

Only 4 of top 15 teams in state tourney, 2 unranked teams. Sounds like a watered down tourney. Too bad 4 of the section finals eliminated a top 10 team. State tourney should have been teams in finals for sectio 1,2,4 and 6. All 8 teams were in top 10. This is why the section set up is a joke and sh...