HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

if anybody can answer that question, they are in the wrong business!!<br><br>i think there will be some records broken, but it will be considered under the "new era" of the nhl, and won't directly relate to the existing records. <p></p><i></i>

i don't clearly understand the whole elite I/elite II deal, but i do understand that the name of this thread is "...section 1a/1aa..." <br><br>HOWEVER, i noticed that 4 kids from faribault made the roster. last i checked, faribault was going to be playing in section 6a this year (2005-06)....

i don't clearly understand the whole elite I/elite II deal, but i do understand that the name of this thread is "...section 1a/1aa..." <br><br>HOWEVER, i noticed that 4 kids from faribault made the roster. last i checked, faribault was going to be playing in section 6a this year (2005-06)....

I spoke to one of the guys that was running the tryouts, and asked him about the '90 team... his response was that they were "Andy's team" and that the kids on the other teams were getting really frustrated with their stickwork. I guess everybody was told to keep it clean, and for the most...

it sounds like this is the million dollar question for kids with bantam eligibility that might have the talent to play high school hockey. i don't know what the answer is, but i'm sure every situation is a little different. some things to weigh while in the process of making the decision:<br>1. qual...

i've seen austin appear a few times on this thread, but i haven't heard much about them. it would be great if they could have that kind of success. are they for real? did a.l. lose a bunch of seniors last year? is austin better than a.l. was last year?<br><br>roch hockey dad... if you ignore somethi...