All Division 1 Men's Scores for this season, sorted by team. Scores through November 26, 2005 courtesy of USCHO.com . Previous Week's Rankings . New ratings will be posted each week, time permitting.
Maximum Goal Differential = 7 RANK TEAM W L T GmPerf Sched Total Last 5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1,Wisconsin,_________________________ 11 1 2, 1.7, 7.9, 9.57, 9.71 2,Colorado College,__________________ 12 3 1, 1.7, 7.4, 9.11, 7.79 3,Miami,_____________________________ 9 2 1, 1.8, 7.2, 9.07, 8.69 4,Michigan,__________________________ 9 3 1, 1.4, 7.6, 8.93, 8.20 5,Maine,_____________________________ 9 4 0, 1.8, 7.1, 8.83, 7.95 6,Minnesota,_________________________ 7 3 4, 1.1, 7.4, 8.50, 8.65 7,Ohio State,________________________ 7 5 1, 0.8, 7.7, 8.42, 10.28 8,Colgate,___________________________ 8 2 3, 1.8, 6.5, 8.33, 7.63 9,Vermont,___________________________ 10 3 0, 1.5, 6.7, 8.23, 8.35 10,North Dakota,______________________ 8 5 1, 0.4, 7.7, 8.05, 8.12 11,Ferris State,______________________ 7 3 4, 1.1, 7.0, 8.04, 8.61 12,Boston College,____________________ 6 3 1, 0.7, 7.2, 7.95, 8.04 13,St. Lawrence,______________________ 10 4 0, 0.9, 7.0, 7.91, 7.35 14,St. Cloud State,___________________ 5 7 2, 0.1, 7.8, 7.87, 8.90 15,Lake Superior,_____________________ 6 5 3, 0.1, 7.7, 7.85, 7.22 16,Harvard,___________________________ 7 3 1, 0.7, 7.1, 7.84, 7.32 17,Alaska-Fairbanks,__________________ 6 4 2, 0.0, 7.8, 7.80, 7.22 18,Michigan State,____________________ 5 6 4, 0.2, 7.5, 7.74, 6.91 19,New Hampshire,_____________________ 7 4 2, 0.5, 7.1, 7.68, 7.11 20,Denver,____________________________ 6 6 2, 0.3, 7.3, 7.62, 7.24 21,Bemidji State,_____________________ 8 2 0, 1.1, 6.5, 7.59, 6.60 22,Nebraska-Omaha,____________________ 7 6 0, 0.2, 7.3, 7.55, 8.23 23,Northern Michigan,_________________ 7 7 0, 0.1, 7.4, 7.47, 7.24 24,Minnesota State,___________________ 3 8 2, -0.7, 8.1, 7.39, 9.39 25,Dartmouth,_________________________ 4 5 0, 0.3, 7.0, 7.38 26,Clarkson,__________________________ 9 4 1, 0.9, 6.4, 7.30, 6.94 27,Boston University,_________________ 4 5 2, -0.2, 7.5, 7.29, 7.24 28,Quinnipiac,________________________ 9 7 0, 0.8, 6.4, 7.26, 5.79 29,Providence,________________________ 6 6 1, 0.2, 6.9, 7.08, 6.02 30,Cornell,___________________________ 6 3 1, 0.2, 6.8, 7.01, 6.13 31,Notre Dame,________________________ 3 8 1, -1.0, 8.0, 6.97, 6.86 32,Rensselaer,________________________ 7 5 3, 0.3, 6.6, 6.94, 7.64 33,Princeton,_________________________ 3 7 0, -0.5, 7.2, 6.72, 6.73 34,Minnesota-Duluth,__________________ 5 7 2, -0.3, 6.9, 6.65, 7.35 35,Brown,_____________________________ 2 5 1, -1.1, 7.7, 6.56 36,Western Michigan,__________________ 3 7 2, -1.3, 7.8, 6.53, 7.84 37,Massachusetts,_____________________ 4 8 0, -1.0, 7.5, 6.53, 7.27 38,Niagara,___________________________ 6 6 1, 0.1, 6.4, 6.51, 6.61 39,Bowling Green,_____________________ 3 9 1, -1.4, 7.7, 6.33, 6.41 40,Alaska-Anchorage,__________________ 3 8 1, -1.6, 7.9, 6.33, 6.14 41,Union,_____________________________ 7 5 2, -0.1, 6.5, 6.32, 6.73 42,Mass.-Lowell,______________________ 4 7 0, -1.1, 7.3, 6.17, 6.38 43,Alabama-Huntsville,________________ 4 4 0, -0.6, 6.8, 6.16 44,Holy Cross,________________________ 7 3 1, 0.8, 5.3, 6.09, 4.32 45,Robert Morris,_____________________ 4 7 1, -0.2, 6.3, 6.08, 6.35 46,Northeastern,______________________ 1 8 2, -1.5, 7.6, 6.07, 6.58 47,Air Force,_________________________ 2 8 0, -0.9, 6.7, 5.85, 5.44 48,Sacred Heart,______________________ 5 3 1, 1.1, 4.7, 5.84 49,RIT,_______________________________ 4 7 1, -0.3, 6.0, 5.71, 5.31 50,Mercyhurst,________________________ 7 6 0, 0.2, 5.4, 5.67, 5.06 51,Merrimack,_________________________ 3 7 0, -1.7, 7.1, 5.38, 6.02 52,Michigan Tech,_____________________ 2 11 1, -2.1, 7.4, 5.28, 5.32 53,Connecticut,_______________________ 3 6 1, -0.4, 5.5, 5.15, 5.81 54,Canisius,__________________________ 5 6 1, -0.5, 5.5, 4.96, 4.56 55,Army,______________________________ 3 8 2, -1.2, 6.1, 4.95, 5.68 56,Bentley,___________________________ 5 5 2, -1.2, 6.0, 4.78, 5.33 57,Wayne State,_______________________ 0 8 2, -2.7, 7.2, 4.53, 5.07 58,Yale,______________________________ 1 8 0, -2.7, 7.2, 4.53 59,American Int'l,____________________ 0 8 1, -3.4, 6.2, 2.71 See Rankings Without Considering Goal Differential Below Maximum Goal Differential = 1 RANK TEAM W L T GmPerf Sched Total Last 5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1,Wisconsin,_________________________ 11 1 2, 0.7, 7.3, 7.97, 8.26 2,Colorado College,__________________ 12 3 1, 0.6, 7.1, 7.62, 7.15 3,Michigan,__________________________ 9 3 1, 0.5, 7.1, 7.61, 7.46 4,Miami,_____________________________ 9 2 1, 0.6, 7.0, 7.58, 7.23 5,Vermont,___________________________ 10 3 0, 0.5, 6.9, 7.45, 7.24 6,St. Lawrence,______________________ 10 4 0, 0.4, 7.0, 7.42, 7.16 7,Alaska-Fairbanks,__________________ 6 4 2, 0.2, 7.2, 7.41, 7.16 8,Harvard,___________________________ 7 3 1, 0.4, 7.0, 7.39, 7.37 9,Maine,_____________________________ 9 4 0, 0.4, 7.0, 7.39, 6.84 10,Bemidji State,_____________________ 8 2 0, 0.6, 6.8, 7.39, 7.35 11,North Dakota,______________________ 8 5 1, 0.2, 7.2, 7.38, 7.39 12,Minnesota,_________________________ 7 3 4, 0.3, 7.1, 7.38, 7.73 13,Boston College,____________________ 6 3 1, 0.3, 7.1, 7.36, 7.66 14,Colgate,___________________________ 8 2 3, 0.5, 6.9, 7.35, 7.22 15,Ferris State,______________________ 7 3 4, 0.3, 7.0, 7.32, 7.58 16,Ohio State,________________________ 7 5 1, 0.2, 7.1, 7.27, 8.02 17,Cornell,___________________________ 6 3 1, 0.3, 7.0, 7.26, 6.96 18,New Hampshire,_____________________ 7 4 2, 0.2, 7.0, 7.25, 7.34 19,Lake Superior,_____________________ 6 5 3, 0.1, 7.1, 7.21, 7.25 20,Clarkson,__________________________ 9 4 1, 0.4, 6.8, 7.18, 7.45 21,Nebraska-Omaha,____________________ 7 6 0, 0.1, 7.1, 7.16, 7.33 22,Michigan State,____________________ 5 6 4, -0.1, 7.2, 7.13, 6.66 23,St. Cloud State,___________________ 5 7 2, -0.1, 7.2, 7.10, 7.38 24,Northern Michigan,_________________ 7 7 0, 0.0, 7.1, 7.09, 6.96 25,Boston University,_________________ 4 5 2, -0.1, 7.1, 7.06, 6.97 26,Rensselaer,________________________ 7 5 3, 0.1, 6.9, 7.03, 7.23 27,Providence,________________________ 6 6 1, 0.0, 7.0, 7.01, 6.66 28,Denver,____________________________ 6 6 2, 0.0, 7.0, 7.01, 6.72 29,Union,_____________________________ 7 5 2, 0.1, 6.9, 7.01, 7.26 30,Minnesota State,___________________ 3 8 2, -0.4, 7.4, 6.98, 7.42 31,Quinnipiac,________________________ 9 7 0, 0.1, 6.8, 6.96, 6.38 32,Dartmouth,_________________________ 4 5 0, -0.1, 7.0, 6.93 33,Niagara,___________________________ 6 6 1, 0.0, 6.9, 6.92, 6.73 34,Minnesota-Duluth,__________________ 5 7 2, -0.1, 7.0, 6.89, 6.97 35,Alaska-Anchorage,__________________ 3 8 1, -0.4, 7.3, 6.89, 6.71 36,Holy Cross,________________________ 7 3 1, 0.4, 6.5, 6.87, 6.52 37,Brown,_____________________________ 2 5 1, -0.4, 7.2, 6.84 38,Western Michigan,__________________ 3 7 2, -0.3, 7.2, 6.84, 7.06 39,Alabama-Huntsville,________________ 4 4 0, 0.0, 6.8, 6.83 40,Massachusetts,_____________________ 4 8 0, -0.3, 7.2, 6.82, 7.35 41,Mass.-Lowell,______________________ 4 7 0, -0.3, 7.1, 6.82, 6.90 42,Notre Dame,________________________ 3 8 1, -0.4, 7.2, 6.77, 6.88 43,Sacred Heart,______________________ 5 3 1, 0.2, 6.5, 6.70 44,Bowling Green,_____________________ 3 9 1, -0.5, 7.2, 6.70, 6.62 45,Bentley,___________________________ 5 5 2, 0.0, 6.7, 6.66, 6.88 46,Mercyhurst,________________________ 7 6 0, 0.1, 6.6, 6.65, 6.27 47,Princeton,_________________________ 3 7 0, -0.4, 7.0, 6.64, 6.51 48,Merrimack,_________________________ 3 7 0, -0.4, 7.0, 6.61, 6.61 49,Northeastern,______________________ 1 8 2, -0.6, 7.2, 6.60, 6.74 50,Robert Morris,_____________________ 4 7 1, -0.3, 6.8, 6.55, 6.71 51,RIT,_______________________________ 4 7 1, -0.3, 6.7, 6.47, 6.14 52,Canisius,__________________________ 5 6 1, -0.1, 6.5, 6.47, 6.48 53,Michigan Tech,_____________________ 2 11 1, -0.6, 7.1, 6.44, 6.69 54,Army,______________________________ 3 8 2, -0.4, 6.8, 6.38, 6.88 55,Wayne State,_______________________ 0 8 2, -0.8, 7.2, 6.37, 6.54 56,Air Force,_________________________ 2 8 0, -0.6, 7.0, 6.37, 6.43 57,Connecticut,_______________________ 3 6 1, -0.3, 6.7, 6.36, 6.41 58,Yale,______________________________ 1 8 0, -0.8, 7.1, 6.33 59,American Int'l,____________________ 0 8 1, -0.9, 6.8, 5.87 Link to the 2004-2005 Final Rankings . The program starts all teams with an equal arbitrary value and then adjusts them all recursively based on game scores until the lowest cumulative error between expected goal differentials and actual goal differentials is reached (convergence). One effect often noticed is that a team's rating can change slightly without playing due to previous opponents playing which affects their rating and their opponent's rating, etc. The Total column is in goal units and the difference in this value between any two teams is the predicted goal differential for a game played at a neutral site between those two teams. It should be noted that these rankings are an average performance value for each team for the entire season, all games are equally weighted, so a team's latest game may make up only 1/40th of a teams rating at the end of the season. Games that go to shootouts for decision are considered ties for ratings purposes. Actually, there are two different rankings listed below. The first is as described above with the maximum goal differential used per game set at 7. This ordering ends up similar to CCHP, although differences do arise due to CCHP considering home ice advantage and CCHP not using a goal differential limit. The second ranking sets maximum goal differential at 1, thereby just considering whether the game was won, lost, or tied (and strength of opponent). This was done because the NCAA has indicated that it does not want to consider goal differential in the selection process. Note that the Total column in the GD=1 ranking is therefore in win percentage units rather than goal units. A rated .01 ahead of B can be interpreted as saying that if these two teams played exclusively against each other, A's predicted winning percentage is 1 percentage point higher than B's (i.e. A's predicted winning percentage vs. B would be .495, B's against A would be .505). However, since the teams do not play exclusively against the other it is actually a little bit more complex than above as teams can be ranked as high as 1.0 above their average opponent (if they were undefeated and untied) and as low as 1.0 below their average opponent (if they lost all of their games). Note that the current spread between #1 and #59 is about 1.9 . Not surprisingly, the ordering ends up very similar to KRACH . Links to other ratings: CT IA IL IN MA MD MD-VA ME MI MN MN-WI-ND MO ND Northeast NH NJ NY WNY Club OH PA-E PA-W RI VA VT WI wWI USA New England Prep Midget Minor AAA Midget Major AAA Men's NCAA D1USHSHO.com High School Ice Hockey Forums
Over 4000 registered members, HS message boards for over 30 states + midget, junior, college, and pro hockey forums! Receive email when this page changes