Which Central Lakes Team Do you think is the best?
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 4:36 pm
Who's the best?
HighSchoolHockeyForums.com
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://ushsho.com/forums/
Which Central Lakes Team Do you think is the best?
Page 1 of 3
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 4:43 pm
The top 3 has to be Tech, Brainerd, and LF. But Tech beat BRD, BRD beat LF, and LF beat Tech. I'd have to go with LF probably.
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 5:30 pm
I have to go with tech
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 5:55 pm
PASTRAPIDSFAN...where do you get your peyote...can I get some?
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 5:58 pm
Does tech play brainerd again?
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 6:06 pm
2/15/07 or thats what a site says, so I would imagine that they do!riverskater wrote:Does tech play brainerd again?
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 6:07 pm
Get my whatGeorge Blanda wrote:PASTRAPIDSFAN...where do you get your peyote...can I get some?
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 6:09 pm
PASTRAPIDSFAN wrote:Type of Shroom that you halucinate on!George Blanda wrote: peyote
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 6:22 pm
LF: the game against Brainerd could've gone either way and they've throttled everyone else while the Warriors have lost to both FF and Tech. Tech is coming on strong as is FF.
So, if I were forced to rank them:
Floaters
Worriers
Technicals
Fungus Falls
So, if I were forced to rank them:
Floaters
Worriers
Technicals
Fungus Falls
CLC
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:53 pm
I don't think it's any question that LF is tops. But I think FF is the 2nd best
team.
Scores that prove my point:
FF-3
Sartell-2
FF-6
Tech-1
FF-6
Brainard-2
FF-8
SRR-0
FF-5
RL-2
FF-4
Wil-1
FF-3
Alex-2
Fergus did get killed by the flyers, but have improved immensely since then, but the other night lost to Apollo in a game where the eagles scored 2 shorthanded goals in 5 minutes. Nothing really clicked.
team.
Scores that prove my point:
FF-3
Sartell-2
FF-6
Tech-1
FF-6
Brainard-2
FF-8
SRR-0
FF-5
RL-2
FF-4
Wil-1
FF-3
Alex-2
Fergus did get killed by the flyers, but have improved immensely since then, but the other night lost to Apollo in a game where the eagles scored 2 shorthanded goals in 5 minutes. Nothing really clicked.
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:58 pm
LF is the best
2a. Brainerd
2b. Fergus
4. Tech
Have to put brainerd ahead of Fergus just because they have beaten LF.
2a. Brainerd
2b. Fergus
4. Tech
Have to put brainerd ahead of Fergus just because they have beaten LF.
Re: CLC
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:29 pm
Ya but you never put the game there where the Flyers beat Fergus 8-1 when they played them, though next week's game against them I am looking forward to. It is also senior night for the Flyers so they will play their hearts out!maddangles wrote:I don't think it's any question that LF is tops. But I think FF is the 2nd best
team.
Scores that prove my point:
FF-3
Sartell-2
FF-6
Tech-1
FF-6
Brainard-2
FF-8
SRR-0
FF-5
RL-2
FF-4
Wil-1
FF-3
Alex-2
Fergus did get killed by the flyers, but have improved immensely since then, but the other night lost to Apollo in a game where the eagles scored 2 shorthanded goals in 5 minutes. Nothing really clicked.
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 11:36 pm
Not disagreeing with any of you but Apollo is a team that at least deserves a look. They've been playing quite well recently and their next game against Brainerd will be a big chance for them to show what they're made of and show that they deserve to be mentioned as a top team in the Central Lakes.
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 1:38 am
1- Brainerd
2-Little Falls
3-Fergus
4-Tech
5-Apollo
6-Alex
7-SRR
8-Sartell
9-RLS
10-Willmar
Brainerd yes got pounded by Fergus, but they beat LF AND most importantly Brainerd is the only CLC team that has ANY significant out-of-conference wins...(Blaine Elk STA)
2-Little Falls
3-Fergus
4-Tech
5-Apollo
6-Alex
7-SRR
8-Sartell
9-RLS
10-Willmar
Brainerd yes got pounded by Fergus, but they beat LF AND most importantly Brainerd is the only CLC team that has ANY significant out-of-conference wins...(Blaine Elk STA)
today....
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 2:50 am
For CLC competition, if you are scheduled to play only one time - 2 pts,
if you are scheduled to play twice - 1 pt each. Any game canceled - 0 pts.( what about ties?)
Boys' Hky CLC OA Pts
Brainerd---- 6 - 2 9-6-1 10
Little F.------ 7 - 1 14 - 2 9
FF------------- 7 - 2 8 - 5 8
Tech --------- 7 - 3 7-8-1 8
SR/R ---------5 - 4 6-7-1 5
Alex-----------4 - 5 5 - 9 4
Apollo---------4 - 5 5-8-1 4
Rocori/RL----1 - 7 3-12 1
Sartell--------2 - 7 5-10 2
Willmar-------0 - 7 4 - 9 0
Fergus Falls has...
vs Srtl Today
@ LF 1/23
vs TECH 1/25
@ R/RL 1/30
@ Will 2/6
vs SRR 2/8
vs ALX 2/13
@ Aplo 2/15
TECH has...
@ Willmar Yesterday
@ SRR Tonight
@ Sartl 1/23
@ FF 1/25
vs Aplo 2/1 (then after Moorhead, Roseau, and Cloquet)
vs BRD 2/15
Little Falls has...
vs Alex Yesterday
vs FF 1/23
@SRR 1/25
@ Will 2/2
vs Will 2/3 (home and home--cute)
@ SAR 2/8
@ RRL 2/13
BarnYard has...
@ Aplo 1/23
@ Will 1/25 (2 pts)
vs Srtl 1/30
@ Alex 2/6 (then after Cloquet, and Moorhead)
@ TECH 2/15 (before Warroad)
if you are scheduled to play twice - 1 pt each. Any game canceled - 0 pts.( what about ties?)
Boys' Hky CLC OA Pts
Brainerd---- 6 - 2 9-6-1 10
Little F.------ 7 - 1 14 - 2 9
FF------------- 7 - 2 8 - 5 8
Tech --------- 7 - 3 7-8-1 8
SR/R ---------5 - 4 6-7-1 5
Alex-----------4 - 5 5 - 9 4
Apollo---------4 - 5 5-8-1 4
Rocori/RL----1 - 7 3-12 1
Sartell--------2 - 7 5-10 2
Willmar-------0 - 7 4 - 9 0
Fergus Falls has...
vs Srtl Today
@ LF 1/23
vs TECH 1/25
@ R/RL 1/30
@ Will 2/6
vs SRR 2/8
vs ALX 2/13
@ Aplo 2/15
TECH has...
@ Willmar Yesterday
@ SRR Tonight
@ Sartl 1/23
@ FF 1/25
vs Aplo 2/1 (then after Moorhead, Roseau, and Cloquet)
vs BRD 2/15
Little Falls has...
vs Alex Yesterday
vs FF 1/23
@SRR 1/25
@ Will 2/2
vs Will 2/3 (home and home--cute)
@ SAR 2/8
@ RRL 2/13
BarnYard has...
@ Aplo 1/23
@ Will 1/25 (2 pts)
vs Srtl 1/30
@ Alex 2/6 (then after Cloquet, and Moorhead)
@ TECH 2/15 (before Warroad)
Re: today....
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 6:36 am
Morris Wanchuk wrote:For CLC competition, if you are scheduled to play only one time - 2 pts,
if you are scheduled to play twice - 1 pt each. Any game canceled - 0 pts.( what about ties?)
Boys' Hky CLC OA Pts
Brainerd---- 6 - 2 9-6-1 10
Little F.------ 7 - 1 14 - 2 9
FF------------- 7 - 2 8 - 5 8
Tech --------- 7 - 3 7-8-1 8
SR/R ---------5 - 4 6-7-1 5
Alex-----------4 - 5 5 - 9 4
Apollo---------4 - 5 5-8-1 4
Rocori/RL----1 - 7 3-12 1
Sartell--------2 - 7 5-10 2
Willmar-------0 - 7 4 - 9 0
Fergus Falls has...
vs Srtl Today
@ LF 1/23
vs TECH 1/25
@ R/RL 1/30
@ Will 2/6
vs SRR 2/8
vs ALX 2/13
@ Aplo 2/15
TECH has...
@ Willmar Yesterday
@ SRR Tonight
@ Sartl 1/23
@ FF 1/25
vs Aplo 2/1 (then after Moorhead, Roseau, and Cloquet)
vs BRD 2/15
Little Falls has...
vs Alex Yesterday Dude you forgot a game here! Dumbyyy
vs FF 1/23
@SRR 1/25
@ Will 2/2
vs Will 2/3 (home and home--cute)
@ SAR 2/8
@ RRL 2/13
BarnYard has...
@ Aplo 1/23
@ Will 1/25 (2 pts)
vs Srtl 1/30
@ Alex 2/6 (then after Cloquet, and Moorhead)
@ TECH 2/15 (before Warroad)
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 8:45 am
Brainerd is.
To be the best you have to win.
Who was the best team in the 1980 olympics
To be the best you have to win.
Who was the best team in the 1980 olympics
Re: today....
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 9:38 am
game on 2/03 was originally scheduled for 12/21, but was postponed due to weather.Morris Wanchuk wrote: Little Falls has...
vs Alex Yesterday
vs FF 1/23
@SRR 1/25
@ Will 2/2
vs Will 2/3 (home and home--cute)
@ SAR 2/8
@ RRL 2/13
You will also notice that the standings will change today after last nights games. There is also a typo. they have River Lakes (1 point) listed ahead of Sartell (2 points).
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 9:38 am
http://www.mshsl.org/mshsl/schoolactpag ... school=258
This shows it all I would think, and wow LF is still on top after there loss to Brainerd!
This shows it all I would think, and wow LF is still on top after there loss to Brainerd!
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 9:48 am
New Standings
Brainerd......... 6-2. 9-6-1,-- 10
Little Falls....... 8-1 ,15-2,-- -10
Tech.............. 8-3, 8-8-1,--- 9
Fergus Falls.... 7-2, 8-5,----- 8
Sauk Rapids... 5-4, 6-7-1,--- 5
Apollo............ 5-5, 6-8-1,--- 5
Alexandria..... 4-6, 5-10,---- 4
Sartell............ 2-7, 5-10,---- 2
River Lakes.... 1-8, 3-13,---- 1
Willmar.......... 0-8, 4-10,---- 0
Brainerd......... 6-2. 9-6-1,-- 10
Little Falls....... 8-1 ,15-2,-- -10
Tech.............. 8-3, 8-8-1,--- 9
Fergus Falls.... 7-2, 8-5,----- 8
Sauk Rapids... 5-4, 6-7-1,--- 5
Apollo............ 5-5, 6-8-1,--- 5
Alexandria..... 4-6, 5-10,---- 4
Sartell............ 2-7, 5-10,---- 2
River Lakes.... 1-8, 3-13,---- 1
Willmar.......... 0-8, 4-10,---- 0
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 11:24 pm
Well, SR gave Tech a nice little kick tonight by winning 5-2.
That makes SR 5-6 against class A teams. What'd Hommerding make his boys do tonight? I bet he made them run 10 miles out side in nothing but their jock strap.
That makes SR 5-6 against class A teams. What'd Hommerding make his boys do tonight? I bet he made them run 10 miles out side in nothing but their jock strap.
ff vs. sartell
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 11:33 pm
fergus smoked sartell tonight 7-1. running time early in the 3rd. peck had a hattrick, gaustad had 2 and several huge hits. fandrich had a nice game as well.
Never Trust Your Sources (pt. 1)
Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:07 am
Well, I gave you guys all day, laid out the clues (breadcrumbs), tried to *hint (down the trail) to you that somethings just not right. RLStars was very close when he mentioned that the standings had an "error". One guy called Mo a dummy for not listing the Prairie Lakes game, when they join the conference, maybe I will. Mo didnt mention a scrimmage against a team close to the northshore either. Mo is stupid (just ask BobLee) but no dummy.
I will now reveal what I saved from my 2:50AM post from yesterday.
According to the CLC website and standings....
Fergus Falls .....
Has a 2pt victory against BRD
TECH.......
Has a 2pt victory vs R/RL
and a 2pt loss to LF
Little Falls.......
Has a 2pt victory vs Aplo AND TECH
and a 2pt loss to BRD
BARNYARD........
Has 2 pt victories over SR/R, R/RL, and LF
and a 2 pt loss to FF
THE CLC WEBSITE INCORRECTLY IDENTIFIES BRDS EARLIER GAME vs SARTELL AS 2PTS. (Barnyard hosts Sartell soon, as you see from Mos schedule)
Therefore Barnyard only has nine points and is in second place...(sorry top_shelf)
I will now reveal what I saved from my 2:50AM post from yesterday.
According to the CLC website and standings....
Fergus Falls .....
Has a 2pt victory against BRD
TECH.......
Has a 2pt victory vs R/RL
and a 2pt loss to LF
Little Falls.......
Has a 2pt victory vs Aplo AND TECH
and a 2pt loss to BRD
BARNYARD........
Has 2 pt victories over SR/R, R/RL, and LF
and a 2 pt loss to FF
THE CLC WEBSITE INCORRECTLY IDENTIFIES BRDS EARLIER GAME vs SARTELL AS 2PTS. (Barnyard hosts Sartell soon, as you see from Mos schedule)
Therefore Barnyard only has nine points and is in second place...(sorry top_shelf)
Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 3:22 am
I'm sick of hearing about Little Falls. Look at the teams they've played. Only two tough teams: Virginia and Brainerd. And they lost to both. And Brainerd is questionable. Their record reflects the teams they've played. No one good except for those two teams. And they have no one good left on their schedule. If they get seeded top 4 in State the whole new system they put in for State is ridiculous. Yeah, their stars or whoever played in it performed well in the Elite League, but come on. They would be lucky to finish top 4 in Section 7A. They are a joke come State time. Let them prove people wrong. I don't think they will.
Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 3:23 am
I'm sick of hearing about Little Falls. Look at the teams they've played. Only two tough teams: Virginia and Brainerd. And they lost to both. And Brainerd is questionable. Their record reflects the teams they've played. No one good except for those two teams. And they have no one good left on their schedule. If they get seeded top 4 in State the whole new system they put in for State is ridiculous. Yeah, their stars or whoever played in it performed well in the Elite League, but come on. They would be lucky to finish top 4 in Section 7A. They are a joke come State time. Let them prove people wrong. I don't think they will.