Page 1 of 2

GRG vs CLOQUET

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:42 am
by bella01
so we're all excited to see the results of the upcoming grg vs cloquet game... with cloquet being the team to beat grg is gonna have to be strong and play their best game of the season to get past thunder and her girls...should be a close match...?

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:45 am
by boblee
I'm looking to the Lightning in a mild upset. I think they have too much offensive firepower. The defense played good this past weekend, as did both goalies. I am sure it will be a good matchup. Cloquet is hot and have won 3 straight. While the Lightning have done likewise, scoring 18 goals in the past three games. I'll say Lighting 4, Lumberjacks 3. Lunquist gets two for the Jacks and Arola scores two for the Lightning.

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 11:32 am
by Partagas
Bobby Bobby Bobby.....you ole sly one. Who should be in goal for GRG in your HONEST opinion.

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 11:37 am
by boblee
In my honest opinion, Havel is the goalie for the future and should get a good amount of playing time the rest of the year. But Hammann has been here before and needs at least one shot in a big game. I believe she will get the chance tomorrow. And your thoughts please...

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 11:56 am
by GivinYaTheBusiness
I'd like to see the Lightning win this one, but I don't know if I see it happening. Though they've recently stepped up their scoring, against a goalie like Thunder I'm not sure if it will be enough. I'll say Cloquet 3-2, at least 2 by Lundquist and a goal for Arola and a goal for Gallop.

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:30 am
by bella01
as havel is a very good goalie, she is also unexperienced against shots and scoring opprotunities of the caliber that cloquet is all too good at. cloquet capitilizes on rebounds and havel leaves many
hammann stuggled considerably against the shots that edina and rooseville put on her, but i think her experience against cloquet could help the lightning.
thunder is a good goalie as well but is far from unbeatable, as we saw 17 seconds into section finals last year.
i feel it's going to be a very even game.

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:42 am
by Partagas
I would agree Hamman is deserving of the chance as the senior goalie. And she has played in big games in the past. Havel does have the expirece playing against stellar competition. I saw her play a few games this summer against some great AAA teams. She also was at Mankato Select 15's and faced Lundquist and Esse all week. SHe needs to pay her dues. SHould be a good game......hope I can go. If not keep the site updated.

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:25 am
by bella01
grg loses 4-2

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:29 am
by hawkyfan
Anyone know the details of the game? Who was in nets for GRG, who scored etc.?

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:51 am
by boblee
Sara Hammann was in nets for the Lightning. Amanda Bialon got one Lightning goal...thats all I know of.

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:56 am
by boblee
Second period — 1. CEC, Sadie Lundquist (Courtney Esse, Whitney Anderson), 7:39 (pp); 2. GRG, Amanda Bialon (Michelle Tanner, Jenae Hoeft) 13:49.

Third period — 3. CEC, Jessica Baublitz (Montana Vichorek), 9:24; 4. CEC, Baublitz, 11:11 (penalty shot); 5. CEC, Lundquist, 14:30; 6. GRG, Stacey Hull ( Dana Gallop), 14:58 (pp).

Saves — Sara Hammann, GRG, 19; Paige Thunder, CEC, 20.

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 10:26 am
by hotdog
boblee wrote:Second period — 1. CEC, Sadie Lundquist (Courtney Esse, Whitney Anderson), 7:39 (pp); 2. GRG, Amanda Bialon (Michelle Tanner, Jenae Hoeft) 13:49.

Third period — 3. CEC, Jessica Baublitz (Montana Vichorek), 9:24; 4. CEC, Baublitz, 11:11 (penalty shot); 5. CEC, Lundquist, 14:30; 6. GRG, Stacey Hull ( Dana Gallop), 14:58 (pp).

Saves — Sara Hammann, GRG, 19; Paige Thunder, CEC, 20.
Cloquet is one of the best coached teams in the state!

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 10:51 am
by hawkyfan
boblee wrote:Sara Hammann was in nets for the Lightning. Amanda Bialon got one Lightning goal...thats all I know of.

Bummer...wish they would have given Havel a shot at Cloquet. We know, they know, god knows, everyone knows how Hammann will measure up in the nets against them. :shock: Would have been fun to see Havel in there. Why wouldn't you want your younger goalie to test the waters against them when you may have to call upon her later in the season to go up against them. That way she would know what she's up against.

Anyone know how the GRG JV did?

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 10:53 am
by boblee
hawkyfan wrote:
boblee wrote:Sara Hammann was in nets for the Lightning. Amanda Bialon got one Lightning goal...thats all I know of.

Bummer...wish they would have given Havel a shot at Cloquet. We know, they know, god knows, everyone knows how Hammann will measure up in the nets against them. :shock: Would have been fun to see Havel in there. Why wouldn't you want your younger goalie to test the waters against them when you may have to call upon her later in the season to go up against them. That way she would know what she's up against.

Anyone know how the GRG JV did?
There is another game in Cloquet I would assume. Maybe she would get a shot then...?

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 10:56 am
by boblee
hawkyfan wrote:
boblee wrote:Sara Hammann was in nets for the Lightning. Amanda Bialon got one Lightning goal...thats all I know of.

Bummer...wish they would have given Havel a shot at Cloquet. We know, they know, god knows, everyone knows how Hammann will measure up in the nets against them. :shock: Would have been fun to see Havel in there. Why wouldn't you want your younger goalie to test the waters against them when you may have to call upon her later in the season to go up against them. That way she would know what she's up against.

Anyone know how the GRG JV did?
GRG JV 3, CEC JV 1

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 11:13 am
by hawkyfan
Thanks for the update. The more I think about who played in this game, ya Hammann should she is a senior, its her year. The new goalie has 3 more years to play these games. I guess I am just a little excited about this new goalie that GRG has, especially since I've heard some great things about her, want to see how she does.

GRG

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 10:25 am
by Slicker
You guys are right to be curious on these young players in GRG. In Cloquet we play people early to see if they can play at this level, then they can accumulate experience during the season so we don't end up in Feb. saying, "Your in, now save us"!

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 12:34 pm
by Partagas
Is that becasue of numbers of girls in the program or skill? I agree, it better to see what you have now then later.

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 12:36 pm
by boblee
Back to the who should play goalie...

Hammann...85 save &, 3.6 GAA
Havel...80 save %, 3.0 GAA

Neither sets of numbers are too flattering.

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 12:55 pm
by Slicker
Bottom line is that you should field the best 17 players you can! It's high school hockey!!! And BobLee, and as an outside observer on your goalie question, it's Havel!

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 1:54 pm
by Partagas
Havel's numbers are deciving due to she played one period against Edina and faced 17 shots with not a lot of help. She's only had the one start against Bloominton Jefferson.

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 2:02 pm
by Partagas
Bobby Lee......where did you get 80 shots for Havel? WIth only one start and one period not sure she had 80 yet.

Good luck in FL.

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 2:03 pm
by xk1
I believe he means 80% of the shots

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 3:24 pm
by Partagas
SOrry.....misread it. He's right.

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 12:26 pm
by boblee
Slicker wrote:Bottom line is that you should field the best 17 players you can! It's high school hockey!!! And BobLee, and as an outside observer on your goalie question, it's Havel!
I've heard Havel has the go today. Good luck Lightning!