Page 1 of 1

Final Records

Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 10:19 am
by hawkfan70
All right JV boys<br>post your final records here<br><br> <p></p><i></i>

HM

Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 3:20 pm
by hockey0711
Hill-Murray = 24-1<br><br>only loss to tartan i believe? <p></p><i></i>

Re: HM

Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 4:23 pm
by gumper1
Yes your right. Oh by the way Woodbury 22-0-3 and they beat Tartan <p></p><i></i>

Re: HM

Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:18 pm
by hockey0711
cool i dont play for hill so i dont really care <p></p><i></i>

Doesn't mean anything...

Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 1:42 am
by PuckU126
Regardless, Woodbury still is a mediocre hockey club. That JV record doesn't mean anything. Let’s see them do that in a few years at the varsity level, when it counts!<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :smokin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smokin.gif ALT=":smokin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>The Puck – aka: The self-proclaimed People’s Champion <p></p><i></i>

Re: Doesn't mean anything...

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 6:57 pm
by gumper1
Puck your right we need to see what they do at an upper level but there is a very good base there at Woodbury. Every team they saw this year they took care of business. Remember this was done w/no Forth or Third Liners from the Varsity. In 95% of their games they either saw the 4th line of other Varsity teams and in some cases the second goalie at the varsity. <p></p><i></i>

Re: Doesn't mean anything...

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 12:21 am
by curcloin
Roseville 20-3-2 and we didn't play Tartan, but we beat WBL 3 times and we only lost to Cent. which was crap becuase we dominated that whole game. And woodbury in ot and Duluth East, we blew a 3 goal lead. <p></p><i></i>

Re: Doesn't mean anything...

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 1:12 am
by gumper1
curcloin your right Roseville didn't play or beat Tartan but they didn't beat Woodbury in two games and like you stated they lost one of those game . Enough said - Head to Head Woodbury was better than Rosevilles JV this year. In the Conference standings Woodbury 1st , Roseville 2nd , CDH 3rd , WBL 4th, Stillwater 5th , FL 6th . PCG 7th and MV 8th. Hey can't say anything more that is the way they finished in the Suburban East JV Level. <p></p><i></i>

Re: Doesn't mean anything...

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 4:07 pm
by ApolloEagle39
Puck, you may be right, but this is the JV forum and the question was what JV records are, not if that will translate into success at the varsity level. <p></p><i></i>

Re: Doesn't mean anything...

Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 8:18 am
by NINshuggah
I think AL's JV team went something like 11-9 or something. Thats good since their team only had 9 players;<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :eek --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eek.gif ALT=":eek"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> sometimes less. <p></p><i></i>

Re: Doesn't mean anything...

Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 3:42 pm
by ApolloEagle39
When we played them, Virgina's JV team only had like 9 players, they weren't anything special but I'm just wondering how common it is for JV teams to have 10 players and under. After all, isn't JV the future varsity? <p></p><i></i>

Mankato West

Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:24 pm
by MSUhockey39
Mankato West JV wen 12-8 most wins in school history for west's JV team. <p></p><i></i>

JV Records

Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:22 am
by slapshot33
Tonka's Record:<br>24-1-1<br><br>GF - 126<br>GA - 37<br>9 Shutouts<br><br> <p></p><i></i>

GRJV

Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 7:13 pm
by boblee
Grand Rapids:<br><br>18-4-2<br><br>Losses:<br>Moorhead (4-1)<br>Eden Prairie (3-1)<br>Duluth East (6-3)<br>Cloquet (5-2<br><br>Tie:<br>Edina (2-2)<br>Apple Valley (2-2)<br><br>Good Wins:<br>Cloquet (2-1)<br>Elk River (3-1)<br>Jefferson (4-3)<br>Roseau (5-1)<br> <p>Grand Rapids-2006 State Runner Up</p><i></i>

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 11:57 am
by Guest
go on hawkfan, tell the people how hermantown jv did last year...

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 12:16 pm
by hawkfan70
ha ha
do i really need to?

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 12:31 pm
by Guest
just for their sake. and to maybe stop some of the smack talkn.

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 12:36 pm
by hawkfan70
i don't think anyone on here is talkin any smack....just posting final records from last year

how do you think the hawks jv squad did last year?

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:51 pm
by emonation
im assuming pretty damn good considering ur response of 'do i really need to?' but who knows? why dont you just clarify it for the record.

yep

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 11:20 am
by guest
Hermantown went undefeated 26 and 0 and they only had 10 players or less most of the time. its not luck either you have to have some type of talent when you go undefeated

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 11:23 am
by bobby orrs kid
Hermantown has a special recipe called the UTB game style.
and it obviously worked. East finally decided to grow a set and play them this year but the varsity is still chicken $&!*

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 12:22 pm
by Guest
bobby orrs kid wrote:Hermantown has a special recipe called the UTB game style.
and it obviously worked. East finally decided to grow a set and play them this year but the varsity is still chicken $&!*

ok i'll bite.......what is the UTB game style?