Page 1 of 3

Teams to look out for next year.

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 8:58 pm
by soup3
Who do you think will be good next year, Bantam or peewee A? <p></p><i></i>

Re: Teams to look out for next year.

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 9:27 pm
by Pucknutz69
D8 = <br>Rosemount = nice line combo returning, Anderson and Loew<br><br>Cottage Grove = returning 8 skaters and 1 goalie. Size will be pretty big.<br><br>Woodbury = will might lose too many to JV <p></p><i></i>

Re: Teams to look out for next year.

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 9:34 pm
by soup3
Mankato and Faribault. Similar teams from last year who played in the regional championship. Depending on if they lose any players to high school or not I dont see many D4 teams beating them because most Bantams teams this year are almost all second years. <p></p><i></i>

next year

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 8:55 am
by quantummekanic
2006-2007<br><br>PW A: <br>Wayzata, EP, Edina, Eagan, Centennial<br><br>Bantam A:<br>Centennial, Chaska, EP, Blaine, Duluth East <p></p><i></i>

Re: next year

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:22 pm
by slapshot33
Minnetonka PWA's will be a good club next year.<br><br>6 players return off this year's team along with the core of the #1 ranked PWB's <p></p><i></i>

teams

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:19 pm
by mngopher8
I agree with the blaine pick they should be a good solid team along with centennial. <p></p><i></i>

Re: teams

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:22 pm
by SLP Coach
I seriously am not try to brag or say that the team will be a "top team in the state" or anything like that...but...<br>Southwest/SLP PWA "should" return 11 players that are first year PWA's this season. I am curious to see what they can/will do next season. <p></p><i></i>

Re: teams

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:39 pm
by icehockey08
i agree with pucknutz69 anderson and loew will be rosemounts go to guys next year <p></p><i></i>

SW/SLP

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:42 pm
by quantummekanic
Returning 11 players could make a HUGE difference. <br><br>I forgot to list Edina in BA, but I won't let it bother me. <br> <p></p><i></i>

Re: SW/SLP

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:44 pm
by soup3
How many returning players does the Edina Bantam A team have right now? <p></p><i></i>

Re: SW/SLP

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:51 pm
by hendy1621
For PWA Apple Valley has 10 players returning next year, and Eagan has about half their team, they will both be very very good. <p></p><i></i>

Re: SW/SLP

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:54 pm
by nipeshow17
edina has 6 returning players, 1 goalie who is very good but has some bad decisions sometimes, 2 defense, and 3 forwards. they will be very good next year because of them and they will get some very good b1's and some danglers from peewee A. <p></p><i></i>

Re: Mankato PWA/BA

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:13 pm
by hockeykid14
Mankato PWA's will be the worst in the last 5 years, and the Bantam "A" the best in the last 5 years...Bantam "A" team should make a run towards state as they did as PWA's last year... <p></p><i></i>

2006-2007 Pee-Wee A Pre-Season Rankings

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:20 pm
by Rangerhockey
Here is my guess as to what the Pee-Wee A top 10 Rankings will look like at the beginning of next year:<br><br>Eagan<br>Duluth East<br>Wayzata<br>Chaska<br>Blaine<br>Minnetonka<br>Edina<br>Apple Valley<br>Woodbury<br>Centennial<br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>

Re: 2006-2007 Pee-Wee A Pre-Season Rankings

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 5:35 pm
by soup3
I agree with hockeykid. Depending on if any peewee players this year step it up over the summer the bantam team will be VERY similar to the peewee team last year. besides drew weber (who i think would be on the bantam A team this year if he was a couple months older) nobody else is for sure on the A team and will have to work extra extra hard if they wanna be on it. <p></p><i></i>

bantam A

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 5:48 pm
by schoolyardpuck9
Good teams next year for Bantam A: Centennial, Edina, Chaska, EP, Hermantown, Duluth East... <p></p><i></i>

Re: next year

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 6:22 pm
by OnFrozenPond
EP Peewee A will not be close to this year's team. They do not have any returning players and the goaltending will need to come along. <p></p><i></i>

Re: Mankato PWA/BA

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 6:54 pm
by gopherguy17
Hockeykid 14. Next years BA team for Kato will be similar to last years PWA team that played at State. Webber will be the only 1st year that has a chance to make the team as a skater. Not sure if this team will be the best in 5 years... no goaltending to speak of and no one that can consistently put the puck in the net....plus you have possible defections to HS. Lloyd will be a Sophomore with Bantam eligibility. My guess he moves to HS. Campbell has a chance to play some varsity if he continues his development and improves as much as he did last summer. My guess is he can as he is by far the best D on this years Bantams <p></p><i></i>

Re: Mankato PWA/BA

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 7:31 pm
by soup3
Gopherguy17 who would you be? <p></p><i></i>

Re: Mankato PWA/BA

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 7:36 pm
by gopherguy17
Soup3, just an interested bystander who has watched alot of D4 hockey <p></p><i></i>

Re: Mankato PWA/BA

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 7:38 pm
by gopherguy17
Soup3, why do you want to know and who are you. You aren't Lloyd are you? <p></p><i></i>

Re: Mankato PWA/BA

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 7:42 pm
by soup3
haha no im matt campbell i just wanted to know who you were and thanks for the compliment<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

Re: Mankato PWA/BA

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 7:43 pm
by gopherguy17
Soup3, keep improving and Doell may want you next year <p></p><i></i>

Re: Mankato PWA/BA

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 7:47 pm
by soup3
ya i could have an advantage there considering were both from canada kinda got a little connection there <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START ;) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif ALT=";)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> haha <p></p><i></i>

Re: Mankato PWA/BA

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 7:49 pm
by gopherguy17
That might be the only chance...two dumb Canucks<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :D --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif ALT=":D"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>