University of St Thomas
Posted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 3:06 pm
Hearing they’re being forced to Division I for sports... Anyone have any info on plans for the hockey team?
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://ushsho.com/forums/
Biggest problem is the arena. St. Thomas's 1,400 seat arena 7 miles from campus would be the second smallest in D1 hockey. Offering enough scholarships for a competitive D1 team would be difficult without some MAJOR booster support. Recruiting for a 2021 roster should start yesterday. Not saying it can't happen, but it will be a challenge.MrBoDangles wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 3:06 pm Hearing they’re being forced to Division I for sports... Anyone have any info on plans for the hockey team?
I noticed a few big hockey names heading there... makes sense now that they’re going D1The Exiled One wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 3:58 pmBiggest problem is the arena. St. Thomas's 1,400 seat arena 7 miles from campus would be the second smallest in D1 hockey. Offering enough scholarships for a competitive D1 team would be difficult without some MAJOR booster support. Recruiting for a 2021 roster should start yesterday. Not saying it can't happen, but it will be a challenge.MrBoDangles wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 3:06 pm Hearing they’re being forced to Division I for sports... Anyone have any info on plans for the hockey team?
Another option would be to move hockey to an ACHA club team while they recruit and either: A) Build a new arena, or B) Secure rights to a larger nearby arena. Maybe they could work out a deal with St. Paul Academy to tear down Drake arena and build it into a D1 quality facility?
Who are they?MrBoDangles wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 5:17 pmI noticed a few big hockey names heading there... makes sense now that they’re going D1The Exiled One wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 3:58 pmBiggest problem is the arena. St. Thomas's 1,400 seat arena 7 miles from campus would be the second smallest in D1 hockey. Offering enough scholarships for a competitive D1 team would be difficult without some MAJOR booster support. Recruiting for a 2021 roster should start yesterday. Not saying it can't happen, but it will be a challenge.MrBoDangles wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 3:06 pm Hearing they’re being forced to Division I for sports... Anyone have any info on plans for the hockey team?
Another option would be to move hockey to an ACHA club team while they recruit and either: A) Build a new arena, or B) Secure rights to a larger nearby arena. Maybe they could work out a deal with St. Paul Academy to tear down Drake arena and build it into a D1 quality facility?
Mageau is the one that stuck in my head.. I can’t remember the others and where I read it. Youth hockey hub or Karl maybeInThePipes wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 6:21 pmWho are they?MrBoDangles wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 5:17 pmI noticed a few big hockey names heading there... makes sense now that they’re going D1The Exiled One wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 3:58 pm
Biggest problem is the arena. St. Thomas's 1,400 seat arena 7 miles from campus would be the second smallest in D1 hockey. Offering enough scholarships for a competitive D1 team would be difficult without some MAJOR booster support. Recruiting for a 2021 roster should start yesterday. Not saying it can't happen, but it will be a challenge.
Another option would be to move hockey to an ACHA club team while they recruit and either: A) Build a new arena, or B) Secure rights to a larger nearby arena. Maybe they could work out a deal with St. Paul Academy to tear down Drake arena and build it into a D1 quality facility?
greenwayraider wrote: ↑Sun Oct 06, 2019 2:11 pm If they go DI, that will make the U the sixth best DI team in the state.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/c ... tory.htmlmuckandgrinder65 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 08, 2019 9:34 am Side Note/Question:
Any updates on U of Illinois going D1?
I have a relative who has been pushing this for years if not decades. His kids played for the Chicago Mission AAA. His view is Title IX is preventing it, along with hockey isn’t very popular outside Chicago...... the hockey joke is you could drop football at Illinois, nobody would notice.....there are enough kids in Illinois to support a team but maybe DePaul is the answer, or Northwestern or UIC. He doesn’t think Illinois will be D1. Also, there is no booster like Penn State had to fund it.muckandgrinder65 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 08, 2019 9:34 am Side Note/Question:
Any updates on U of Illinois going D1?
I would have to think that there is a deep pocketed booster that is an alum of DePaul or Northwestern? DePaul seems too tree huggerish to me (our nanny goes there...big time tree hugger) so I would think N'Western would be their best bet. Title IX would be better IMO if they weighted football rosters differently, it's the only collegiate sport that has 100+ athletes...maybe count them as 50% towards female numbers when trying to even the playing field.goldy313 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:58 pmI have a relative who has been pushing this for years if not decades. His kids played for the Chicago Mission AAA. His view is Title IX is preventing it, along with hockey isn’t very popular outside Chicago...... the hockey joke is you could drop football at Illinois, nobody would notice.....there are enough kids in Illinois to support a team but maybe DePaul is the answer, or Northwestern or UIC. He doesn’t think Illinois will be D1. Also, there is no booster like Penn State had to fund it.muckandgrinder65 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 08, 2019 9:34 am Side Note/Question:
Any updates on U of Illinois going D1?
So reduce women's participation by 50+?thefatcat wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 8:37 amI would have to think that there is a deep pocketed booster that is an alum of DePaul or Northwestern? DePaul seems too tree huggerish to me (our nanny goes there...big time tree hugger) so I would think N'Western would be their best bet. Title IX would be better IMO if they weighted football rosters differently, it's the only collegiate sport that has 100+ athletes...maybe count them as 50% towards female numbers when trying to even the playing field.goldy313 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:58 pmI have a relative who has been pushing this for years if not decades. His kids played for the Chicago Mission AAA. His view is Title IX is preventing it, along with hockey isn’t very popular outside Chicago...... the hockey joke is you could drop football at Illinois, nobody would notice.....there are enough kids in Illinois to support a team but maybe DePaul is the answer, or Northwestern or UIC. He doesn’t think Illinois will be D1. Also, there is no booster like Penn State had to fund it.muckandgrinder65 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 08, 2019 9:34 am Side Note/Question:
Any updates on U of Illinois going D1?
No 75; so they can add a men's fencing team too. GBSo reduce women's participation by 50+?
Chicago and St Louis area have very good AAA hockey so having a team in Illinois may work from a talent standpoint but after having lived in downstate (not Chicago) Illinois I would say basketball is all that matters and the population is much more like deep south than the mid-west so fan support could be an issue.goldy313 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:58 pmI have a relative who has been pushing this for years if not decades. His kids played for the Chicago Mission AAA. His view is Title IX is preventing it, along with hockey isn’t very popular outside Chicago...... the hockey joke is you could drop football at Illinois, nobody would notice.....there are enough kids in Illinois to support a team but maybe DePaul is the answer, or Northwestern or UIC. He doesn’t think Illinois will be D1. Also, there is no booster like Penn State had to fund it.muckandgrinder65 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 08, 2019 9:34 am Side Note/Question:
Any updates on U of Illinois going D1?
Not sure about that. I have seen many basketball and wresting families switch over to become hockey fans once they are exposed. It would be interesting to know if the Blues or Blackhawks get much support from that area. Actually having a D1 program might spur the additional interest.WarmUpTheBus wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 3:04 pmChicago and St Louis area have very good AAA hockey so having a team in Illinois may work from a talent standpoint but after having lived in downstate (not Chicago) Illinois I would say basketball is all that matters and the population is much more like deep south than the mid-west so fan support could be an issue.goldy313 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:58 pmI have a relative who has been pushing this for years if not decades. His kids played for the Chicago Mission AAA. His view is Title IX is preventing it, along with hockey isn’t very popular outside Chicago...... the hockey joke is you could drop football at Illinois, nobody would notice.....there are enough kids in Illinois to support a team but maybe DePaul is the answer, or Northwestern or UIC. He doesn’t think Illinois will be D1. Also, there is no booster like Penn State had to fund it.muckandgrinder65 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 08, 2019 9:34 am Side Note/Question:
Any updates on U of Illinois going D1?
Yeah, but, the Wolves are not in Champaign, they play in the northwest suburbs (Rosemont) where most of the youth hockey takes place....the Mission went downtown ,which is stupid, the Fury are down by Joliet, but the highest number of rinks and young players are northwest
That's super, but Mankato doesn't lie in a hockey hotbed. In fact they are in an area where wrestling and basketball reign supreme yet they manage ok with an enrollment that without looking I assume is less than UCI. Is UNO in a hockey hotbed? Notre Dame? Penn State? Ohio State? Arizona State?nu2hockey wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 5:04 pmYeah, but, the Wolves are not in Champaign, they play in the northwest suburbs (Rosemont) where most of the youth hockey takes place....the Mission went downtown ,which is stupid, the Fury are down by Joliet, but the highest number of rinks and young players are northwest