HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Who wins?

elliott70 wrote:Who wins?

If Luverne can score early they may score often. I anticipate Redwood has a much better offensive showing against Luverne then they did in the first meeting.

My prediction-

Luverne: 7
Redwood Valley: 5

6-3 Luverne.

Are we talking the same Redwood that got pounded by Ely and ripped a new one by North Shore? Even Mora only lost by one to this team!!

Luverne should win by a minimum of five... Unless they've fallen that drastically.

MrBoDangles wrote:Are we talking the same Redwood that got pounded by Ely and ripped a new one by North Shore? Even Mora only lost by one to this team!!

Luverne should win by a minimum of five... Unless they've fallen that drastically.

It's the same team as much as Princeton is the same team as the one that got pounded 10-0 by Rogers. Teams have bad games, Princeton certainly isn't a 10 goal under dog to Rogers and Luverne isn't a 5 goal favorite over Redwood in my opinion. (This year)

For these teams in the south to go north and play against teams up there is a different transition. Much more physical game to acclimate to.

Redwood will score goals at home. Could absolutely win if they get decent goal tending.

GoldyGopher wrote:

MrBoDangles wrote:Are we talking the same Redwood that got pounded by Ely and ripped a new one by North Shore? Even Mora only lost by one to this team!!

Luverne should win by a minimum of five... Unless they've fallen that drastically.

It's the same team as much as Princeton is the same team as the one that got pounded 10-0 by Rogers. Teams have bad games, Princeton certainly isn't a 10 goal under dog to Rogers and Luverne isn't a 5 goal favorite over Redwood in my opinion. (This year)

For these teams in the south to go north and play against teams up there is a different transition. Much more physical game to acclimate to.

Redwood will score goals at home. Could absolutely win if they get decent goal tending.

Rogers and North Shore/Ely are worlds apart in talent.

MrBoDangles wrote:

GoldyGopher wrote:

MrBoDangles wrote:Are we talking the same Redwood that got pounded by Ely and ripped a new one by North Shore? Even Mora only lost by one to this team!!

Luverne should win by a minimum of five... Unless they've fallen that drastically.

It's the same team as much as Princeton is the same team as the one that got pounded 10-0 by Rogers. Teams have bad games, Princeton certainly isn't a 10 goal under dog to Rogers and Luverne isn't a 5 goal favorite over Redwood in my opinion. (This year)

For these teams in the south to go north and play against teams up there is a different transition. Much more physical game to acclimate to.

Redwood will score goals at home. Could absolutely win if they get decent goal tending.

Rogers and North Shore/Ely are worlds apart in talent.

Absolutely they are, you completely looked right past my point though. Teams have bad games and I was using that example for your team having a horrible game. It happens so I wouldn't judge RV on the couple games they played over the holiday season.

GoldyGopher wrote:

MrBoDangles wrote:

GoldyGopher wrote: It's the same team as much as Princeton is the same team as the one that got pounded 10-0 by Rogers. Teams have bad games, Princeton certainly isn't a 10 goal under dog to Rogers and Luverne isn't a 5 goal favorite over Redwood in my opinion. (This year)

For these teams in the south to go north and play against teams up there is a different transition. Much more physical game to acclimate to.

Redwood will score goals at home. Could absolutely win if they get decent goal tending.

Rogers and North Shore/Ely are worlds apart in talent.

Absolutely they are, you completely looked right past my point though. Teams have bad games and I was using that example for your team having a horrible game. It happens so I wouldn't judge RV on the couple games they played over the holiday season.

We can definitely form an opinion after those three games.. Weak!!!!

MrBoDangles wrote:

GoldyGopher wrote:

MrBoDangles wrote: Rogers and North Shore/Ely are worlds apart in talent.

Absolutely they are, you completely looked right past my point though. Teams have bad games and I was using that example for your team having a horrible game. It happens so I wouldn't judge RV on the couple games they played over the holiday season.

We can definitely form an opinion after those three games.. Weak!!!!

Amen!

Whiner33 wrote:

MrBoDangles wrote:

GoldyGopher wrote: Absolutely they are, you completely looked right past my point though. Teams have bad games and I was using that example for your team having a horrible game. It happens so I wouldn't judge RV on the couple games they played over the holiday season.

We can definitely form an opinion after those three games.. Weak!!!!

Amen!

Luverne will come out on top #Foundation in place

Whiner33 wrote:

MrBoDangles wrote:

GoldyGopher wrote: Absolutely they are, you completely looked right past my point though. Teams have bad games and I was using that example for your team having a horrible game. It happens so I wouldn't judge RV on the couple games they played over the holiday season.

We can definitely form an opinion after those three games.. Weak!!!!

Amen!

You want an opinion on Luverne? Reference the game on 1/5/16 in your own arena.

GoldyGopher wrote:

Whiner33 wrote:

MrBoDangles wrote: We can definitely form an opinion after those three games.. Weak!!!!

Amen!

You want an opinion on Luverne? Reference the game on 1/5/16 in your own arena.

I assume you mean 1/5/17?

bardown27 wrote:

GoldyGopher wrote:

Whiner33 wrote: Amen!

You want an opinion on Luverne? Reference the game on 1/5/16 in your own arena.

I assume you mean 1/5/17?

Ha, yeah. That year change is hard to get used to. I'm definitely not referring to the 14-0 victory over Fairmont that happened 1/5/16.

elliott70 wrote:Who wins?

My prediction:

Luverne 6
RV 5

In OT.

TrojanHockeyFan wrote:

elliott70 wrote:Who wins?

My prediction:

Luverne 6
RV 5

In OT.

6-0 Luverne right now

Time for the extra point in the third? Joe has to be getting anxious to pull the goalie? The poor kid......

Like I said...


You nailed, Luverne nailed it...


They should be the #1 seed, if they don't choke they should be back at the X.

Now what about Princeton and Monticello. (Should we throw Pine City and North Branch in there, too?)

Whiner33 wrote:Time for the extra point in the third? Joe has to be getting anxious to pull the goalie? The poor kid......

Good to see things coming together... #foundation-in-place

elliott70 wrote:Like I said...


You nailed, Luverne nailed it...


They should be the #1 seed, if they don't choke they should be back at the X.

Now what about Princeton and Monticello. (Should we throw Pine City and North Branch in there, too?)

Actually - Chisago Lakes beat Princeton and Monticello, so they should be the 1 seed at this point.

BP wrote:

elliott70 wrote:Like I said...


You nailed, Luverne nailed it...


They should be the #1 seed, if they don't choke they should be back at the X.

Now what about Princeton and Monticello. (Should we throw Pine City and North Branch in there, too?)

Actually - Chisago Lakes beat Princeton and Monticello, so they should be the 1 seed at this point.

Over looked them completely...
No matter the seeding the section tourney should be good.

After that, not so good, but a chance to play at the X is a good start for any program.

Section 5A top 5

1 Chisago Lakes 8-8-0 against top five (ATF) 3-0-0
2 Princeton 7-5-1 ATF 3-2
3 Monticello 10-5-0 ATF 2-2
4 North Branch 7-6-1 ATF 1-2
5 Pine City 12-6-0 ATF 0-3

elliott70 wrote:

BP wrote:

elliott70 wrote:Like I said...


You nailed, Luverne nailed it...


They should be the #1 seed, if they don't choke they should be back at the X.

Now what about Princeton and Monticello. (Should we throw Pine City and North Branch in there, too?)

Actually - Chisago Lakes beat Princeton and Monticello, so they should be the 1 seed at this point.

Over looked them completely...
No matter the seeding the section tourney should be good.

After that, not so good, but a chance to play at the X is a good start for any program.

Yeah, I knew if Luverne got on them early it was going to be troublesome. Luverne and Monticello was more low scoring then I thought it would be but Princeton didn't have hardly any shots on goal. Zwack is pretty good.

I like Monticello to get to the X this year in 5A. I just don't see Chisago being the team this year, should have a better idea in the next few weeks as they have some matchups with teams MAML has played recently and then a matchup with MAML 2/2. CL did get rocked by Buffalo and STMA it's last 2 games.

GoldyGopher wrote:

elliott70 wrote:Who wins?

If Luverne can score early they may score often. I anticipate Redwood has a much better offensive showing against Luverne then they did in the first meeting.

My prediction-

Luverne: 7
Redwood Valley: 5

Is this the 5A thread now?

What happened to your Redwood prediction?

MrBoDangles wrote:

GoldyGopher wrote:

elliott70 wrote:Who wins?

If Luverne can score early they may score often. I anticipate Redwood has a much better offensive showing against Luverne then they did in the first meeting.

My prediction-

Luverne: 7
Redwood Valley: 5

Is this the 5A thread now?

What happened to your Redwood prediction?

Morphed into 5A, but set up a new thread for that...
my prediction was Luverne.

I think Goldy answered ...

MrBoDangles wrote:

GoldyGopher wrote:

elliott70 wrote:Who wins?

If Luverne can score early they may score often. I anticipate Redwood has a much better offensive showing against Luverne then they did in the first meeting.

My prediction-

Luverne: 7
Redwood Valley: 5

Is this the 5A thread now?

What happened to your Redwood prediction?

My prediction of Luverne scoring 7 goals and winning was spot on. Just got the Redwood scoring goals portion wrong. I'll move over to 5A.