Bemidji bs Moorhead Section 8 Final
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2016 2:51 pm
Who is going to come out victorious?
HighSchoolHockeyForums.com
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://ushsho.com/forums/
Bemidji bs Moorhead Section 8 Final
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2016 2:55 pm
I think Bemidji returns to the X.
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:00 pm
moorhead 3-2 OT
Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 12:08 pm
I think Bemidji returns to the X:
BEM-4
MHD-2
FYI - After this year, the section is MHD's for several years to come.
BEM-4
MHD-2
FYI - After this year, the section is MHD's for several years to come.
Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:18 pm
GoldenBear69 wrote:I think Bemidji returns to the X:
BEM-4
MHD-2
FYI - After this year, the section is MHD's for several years to come.
Bet the Sheep will be reloading, too !
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 10:09 am
Not so fast GB, the Wizard of Aus has a heluva group of Bantams coming as long as he doesn't get the curtain ripped open exposing all of his Bells & Whistles and Smoke & MirrorsGoldenBear69 wrote: FYI - After this year, the section is MHD's for several years to come.
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 12:23 pm
Which internet audio on this one?
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:56 pm
Updates
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:00 pm
1-1 after two. Moorhead scored first and then Bemidji tied it up a few minutes later right after they got a power play.mulefarm wrote:Updates
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:00 pm
http://www.meridix.com/mbp/hockey/index ... ype=hockeyWestMetro wrote:Which internet audio on this one?
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:01 pm
1-1 end of 2 via bemidji hockey twitter
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:31 pm
3-2 Bemidji 7 mins left
3-3
3-3
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:43 pm
Heading to overtime. The Jacks will start the OT period with about 30 seconds of power play left over.
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:51 pm
And the winner is..........the Bemidji Lumberjacks! 4-3 OT.
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:55 pm
Hoping the game at Amsoil tomorrow night is just like that.
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 3:03 pm
Will pull for the Jacks at the X - hope they make a better showing than last yr.
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 5:43 pm
As a hockey fan, yes. As a GR fan, I hope it's a comfortable lead late in the game. Not sure if my nerves are up for one of those.grindiangrad-80 wrote:Hoping the game at Amsoil tomorrow night is just like that.
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 11:15 pm
Would someone please provide a recap of the winning play in OT as its sounds to me like 2 Jacks players got deep in the attacking end after a stretch pass uncontested. Sounds like a major defensive letdown on he play. Thanks.warriors41 wrote:And the winner is..........the Bemidji Lumberjacks! 4-3 OT.
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 12:59 am
A bad line change by Moorhead. It looked like one Moorhead player thought it was icing and stopped.RRubberbeeskit wrote:Would someone please provide a recap of the winning play in OT as its sounds to me like 2 Jacks players got deep in the attacking end after a stretch pass uncontested. Sounds like a major defensive letdown on he play. Thanks.warriors41 wrote:And the winner is..........the Bemidji Lumberjacks! 4-3 OT.
Good hustle by two Jacks and the game was over.
Moorhead played well. Jacks played well. It was warm, ice a little slow. Pucks a bit bouncy. Reffing was okay.
An exciting hockey game with lots of fans, good student sections, both bands.
Just a good high school hockey game.
One side was going to be disappointed. But both sides can be proud.
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 1:41 am
It was fun listening to that one. The announcers were fired up. Good stuff.elliott70 wrote:A bad line change by Moorhead. It looked like one Moorhead player thought it was icing and stopped.RRubberbeeskit wrote:Would someone please provide a recap of the winning play in OT as its sounds to me like 2 Jacks players got deep in the attacking end after a stretch pass uncontested. Sounds like a major defensive letdown on he play. Thanks.warriors41 wrote:And the winner is..........the Bemidji Lumberjacks! 4-3 OT.
Good hustle by two Jacks and the game was over.
Moorhead played well. Jacks played well. It was warm, ice a little slow. Pucks a bit bouncy. Reffing was okay.
An exciting hockey game with lots of fans, good student sections, both bands.
Just a good high school hockey game.
One side was going to be disappointed. But both sides can be proud.
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 1:46 am
elliott70 wrote:A bad line change by Moorhead. It looked like one Moorhead player thought it was icing and stopped.RRubberbeeskit wrote:Would someone please provide a recap of the winning play in OT as its sounds to me like 2 Jacks players got deep in the attacking end after a stretch pass uncontested. Sounds like a major defensive letdown on he play. Thanks.warriors41 wrote:And the winner is..........the Bemidji Lumberjacks! 4-3 OT.
Good hustle by two Jacks and the game was over.
Moorhead played well. Jacks played well. It was warm, ice a little slow. Pucks a bit bouncy. Reffing was okay.
An exciting hockey game with lots of fans, good student sections, both bands.
Just a good high school hockey game.
side was going to be disappointed. But both sides can be proud.
Elliott70.. Thanks a ton for the recap I appreciate the details as I didn't quite catch that on the radio as to what happened. It sounded like it was a tremendous game back-and-forth good defensive plays some great scoring opportunities and great saves. A little sidenote . I've been following Moorehead a little more closely as Randkleve came up through the Otters hockey Association and left about two years ago... A little recruiting, sure could have used him on our roster to help our numbers.
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 2:16 am
Elliott, we figured you may had had to change your depends after that gameelliott70 wrote:A bad line change by Moorhead. It looked like one Moorhead player thought it was icing and stopped.
Moorhead played well. Jacks played well. It was warm, ice a little slow. Pucks a bit bouncy. Reffing was okay.
An exciting hockey game with lots of fans, good student sections, both bands.
Just a good high school hockey game.
Kranky Jr. was at the game giving the Shady Bunch updates, sounds like a heluva game, you must of got a little puckered up when the Jacks were 2 men short for 2 minutes late in the game
He said Moorhead wasn't too happy with the winning goal, thought it was a missed icing call
Either way I hope Bemidji makes some noise at the X
Congrats Jacks
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 2:27 am
Not even close to icing.Syd Barrett wrote:Elliott, we figured you may had had to change your depends after that gameelliott70 wrote:A bad line change by Moorhead. It looked like one Moorhead player thought it was icing and stopped.
Moorhead played well. Jacks played well. It was warm, ice a little slow. Pucks a bit bouncy. Reffing was okay.
An exciting hockey game with lots of fans, good student sections, both bands.
Just a good high school hockey game.
Kranky Jr. was at the game giving the Shady Bunch updates, sounds like a heluva game, you must of got a little puckered up when the Jacks were 2 men short for 2 minutes late in the game
He said Moorhead wasn't too happy with the winning goal, thought it was a missed icing call
Either way I hope Bemidji makes some noise at the X
Congrats Jacks
Jon Boy Ammerman screwed up on the line change. Puck is at our blue line and he is pulling kids off the ice.
Calling the two penalties was a bit iffy. Especially since nothing got called after that. But Warroad/Baudette did a decent job overall. The whistles disappeared at about the 2 minute warning.
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 3:37 am
Elliot,
Can u explain why no icing? Even the one announcer sounded like he was expecting a whistle.
I have heard from people at the game with no dog in the fight. Good hockey people that know the game. There thoughts were 100% icing, both bemidji penalties were legit, and MHD penalty with 90 seconds left was brutal.
Can u explain why no icing? Even the one announcer sounded like he was expecting a whistle.
I have heard from people at the game with no dog in the fight. Good hockey people that know the game. There thoughts were 100% icing, both bemidji penalties were legit, and MHD penalty with 90 seconds left was brutal.
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 3:58 am
I was at the end and saw the flight of the puck; it was obviously touched. No one from our vantage point even thought icing. We did think, why are they changing?The Next One wrote:Elliot,
Can u explain why no icing? Even the one announcer sounded like he was expecting a whistle.
I have heard from people at the game with no dog in the fight. Good hockey people that know the game. There thoughts were 100% icing, both bemidji penalties were legit, and MHD penalty with 90 seconds left was brutal.
It was definitely a penalty but based on what was not being called at that point in time I was surprised by it. But everyone watching has a bias. No question that the penalties called on Bemidji were penalties, but again, based on what/how they were calling things we (the group around me) were surprised they called the second one.
As a Moorhead fan I would not expect anything less from you or other fans. But I am being completely honest, it was obviously touched. I have been in the media box and can understand that they may not have seen it. The Bemidji announcers stated it was obviously touched.
As a long time coach as I tell players, you control what you do.
Anyway it was an excellent game despite the bouncing puck.