National camp players posted
Posted: Mon May 04, 2015 9:45 pm
National camp players are now posted on MN Hockey HP page.
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://ushsho.com/forums/
Because he worked so hard for his points this year Sats 81?Sats81 wrote:Congrats to LN's Max Johnson, Henry Enebak and Ryan Edquist all making the 17's.
Also, trying to figure out how in the world Lakeville South's Jack Olsen didn't make 16s?????
Those would be your 2 superstars down in SW MN. I watched a bit of the Class A tourney in March, didn't see them though.....Were they sick? Injured?Whiner33 wrote:Because he worked so hard for his points this year Sats 81?Sats81 wrote:Congrats to LN's Max Johnson, Henry Enebak and Ryan Edquist all making the 17's.
Also, trying to figure out how in the world Lakeville South's Jack Olsen didn't make 16s?????
You're correct Sats they were sitting home licking their wounds from playing with that top six dman in Minnesota all year long!Sats81 wrote:Those would be your 2 superstars down in SW MN. I watched a bit of the Class A tourney in March, didn't see them though.....Were they sick? Injured?Whiner33 wrote:Because he worked so hard for his points this year Sats 81?Sats81 wrote:Congrats to LN's Max Johnson, Henry Enebak and Ryan Edquist all making the 17's.
Also, trying to figure out how in the world Lakeville South's Jack Olsen didn't make 16s?????
Top 6 dmen in MN? I can name 4 on LN alone better than him and probably 2 from LS. I'm sure there are plenty more as well.Whiner33 wrote:You're correct Sats they were sitting home licking their wounds from playing with that top six dman in Minnesota all year long!Sats81 wrote:Those would be your 2 superstars down in SW MN. I watched a bit of the Class A tourney in March, didn't see them though.....Were they sick? Injured?Whiner33 wrote: Because he worked so hard for his points this year Sats 81?
Thank you!InYourFace09 wrote:Are we still talking about Luverne's greatness when they can't seem to make it out of their section? You would think with "3" superstars they could at least play at the X one game a year.
That was an inside joke Sats but glad I got you fired up!Sats81 wrote:Top 6 dmen in MN? I can name 4 on LN alone better than him and probably 2 from LS. I'm sure there are plenty more as well.Whiner33 wrote:You're correct Sats they were sitting home licking their wounds from playing with that top six dman in Minnesota all year long!Sats81 wrote: Those would be your 2 superstars down in SW MN. I watched a bit of the Class A tourney in March, didn't see them though.....Were they sick? Injured?
oldman70 wrote:Were you there?Sats81 wrote:Congrats to LN's Max Johnson, Henry Enebak and Ryan Edquist all making the 17's.
Also, trying to figure out how in the world Lakeville South's Jack Olsen didn't make 16s?????[/quote. Maybe the players picked a head of him had better weekends.
Sats81 wrote:yesoldman70 wrote:Were you there?Sats81 wrote:Congrats to LN's Max Johnson, Henry Enebak and Ryan Edquist all making the 17's.
Also, trying to figure out how in the world Lakeville South's Jack Olsen didn't make 16s?????[/quote. Maybe the players picked a head of him had better weekends.
oldman70 wrote:So was I. I strongly disagree that he shouldn't have been picked.Sats81 wrote:yesoldman70 wrote: Were you there?
Sats81 wrote:Life isn't fair, neither one of us is going to change the results, you didn't say who Jack was better than of the players who were chosen.oldman70 wrote:So was I. I strongly disagree that he shouldn't have been picked.Sats81 wrote:yes
oldman70 wrote:It's a simple opinion. I said I disagreed with yours. Bottom line.Sats81 wrote:Life isn't get over yourself.oldman70 wrote: So was I. I strongly disagree that he shouldn't have been picked.
The chemistry had some bad mixture, "2" of the superstars played extremely well at the end of the year. Top line scored 5 goals in the section final, applied constant pressure throughout the game. It's hard to overcome scoring on yourself, very deflating circumstance. Should be quite exciting to watch next year. If they don't play at the X next year, it will be a huge disappointment.InYourFace09 wrote:Are we still talking about Luverne's greatness when they can't seem to make it out of their section? You would think with "3" superstars they could at least play at the X one game a year.
Great Insight! I'm sure the kids that didn't make it probably didn't work hard.notTONIGHT wrote:Work Harder
Damn. Hijacked again, yet somehow I am feeling the love from hawk. What say we change the name of this "bored board" to LuverneHockeyForum.com. FOLD CARDS, FOLD. Er, I mean Roll Cards, Roll.hawkenjonny wrote:And just to fire up 10minmajor, if Luverne can't get to the X in 2016, then you better start looking at what is wrong down there. Feel bad for this years seniors. Should have been there this year. No competition AT ALL in their section next year and a lot of high scorers on their team. I will be looking for you. Again.