can a coach be a bully ?
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 1:25 pm
I have noticed a trend, are we as parents willing to call our coach a bully ?
If so would Herb ever been able to coach?
If so would Herb ever been able to coach?
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://ushsho.com/forums/
AMEN!!northwoods oldtimer wrote:Hockeymoms run the show today. Energized by politically correct administrations flower power generational B.S. Its enough to make a billy goat puke! Call the admin little johnny got looked at cross eyed by the coach!
Reason they stay home until they are 30 now days.
DAMN DIRTY HIPPIES ... GET OFF MY LAWN AND OUT OF MY HOCKEY RINK!!!northwoods oldtimer wrote:Hockeymoms run the show today. Energized by politically correct administrations flower power generational B.S. Its enough to make a billy goat puke! Call the admin little johnny got looked at cross eyed by the coach!
Reason they stay home until they are 30 now days.
The problem is too many parents today cannot differentiate between the two. Good old fashioned hard nosed coaching is seen to often as mean, intimidating, bullying, you're being too hard on the kids. Mamas want to protect their innocent babies.defense wrote:Of course a coach can bully. But I am defining bullying as seriously singleing out a player and, well , bullying him, over a period of time to where that player is seriously being negatively impacted. This is not to be confused with good old fashioned hard nose coaching. And I don't see Herb Brooks methods as bullying by the way.
AmenSCBlueLiner wrote:The problem is too many parents today cannot differentiate between the two. Good old fashioned hard nosed coaching is seen to often as mean, intimidating, bullying, you're being too hard on the kids. Mamas want to protect their innocent babies.defense wrote:Of course a coach can bully. But I am defining bullying as seriously singleing out a player and, well , bullying him, over a period of time to where that player is seriously being negatively impacted. This is not to be confused with good old fashioned hard nose coaching. And I don't see Herb Brooks methods as bullying by the way.
East Side Pioneer Guy wrote:DAMN DIRTY HIPPIES ... GET OFF MY LAWN AND OUT OF MY HOCKEY RINK!!!
Let's turn it around. The problem is too many coaches today cannot differentiate between the two. Good old fashioned hard-nosed coaching is sometimes driven to a level of meanness, intimidating, and bullying. Mamas will and have a right to protect their innocent babies. Sorry boys.SCBlueLiner wrote:The problem is too many parents today cannot differentiate between the two. Good old fashioned hard nosed coaching is seen to often as mean, intimidating, bullying, you're being too hard on the kids. Mamas want to protect their innocent babies.defense wrote:Of course a coach can bully. But I am defining bullying as seriously singleing out a player and, well , bullying him, over a period of time to where that player is seriously being negatively impacted. This is not to be confused with good old fashioned hard nose coaching. And I don't see Herb Brooks methods as bullying by the way.
Sure, there is just so much "abuse" among hockey coaches going on today.Defensive Zone wrote:Let's turn it around. The problem is too many coaches today cannot differentiate between the two. Good old fashioned hard-nosed coaching is sometimes driven to a level of meanness, intimidating, and bullying. Mamas will and have a right to protect their innocent babies. Sorry boys.SCBlueLiner wrote:The problem is too many parents today cannot differentiate between the two. Good old fashioned hard nosed coaching is seen to often as mean, intimidating, bullying, you're being too hard on the kids. Mamas want to protect their innocent babies.defense wrote:Of course a coach can bully. But I am defining bullying as seriously singleing out a player and, well , bullying him, over a period of time to where that player is seriously being negatively impacted. This is not to be confused with good old fashioned hard nose coaching. And I don't see Herb Brooks methods as bullying by the way.
Give mama a whistle and she can coach the team then.Defensive Zone wrote:Let's turn it around. The problem is too many coaches today cannot differentiate between the two. Good old fashioned hard-nosed coaching is sometimes driven to a level of meanness, intimidating, and bullying. Mamas will and have a right to protect their innocent babies. Sorry boys.SCBlueLiner wrote:The problem is too many parents today cannot differentiate between the two. Good old fashioned hard nosed coaching is seen to often as mean, intimidating, bullying, you're being too hard on the kids. Mamas want to protect their innocent babies.defense wrote:Of course a coach can bully. But I am defining bullying as seriously singleing out a player and, well , bullying him, over a period of time to where that player is seriously being negatively impacted. This is not to be confused with good old fashioned hard nose coaching. And I don't see Herb Brooks methods as bullying by the way.
I agree with everything you say Marty. Problem is, like I stated earlier, too many parents these days confuse the style of coaching you are talking about with the coach being a "bully". Truth is the first time their kid runs foul of the coach for breaking the rules, or heck, for not earning their playing time, it is the coach's fault for being the strict disciplinarian. Can't have that because mom's already invested too much in junior's hockey career and junior always works hard. Must be the coach. Time to lead the campaign in the stands to get rid of him. I've seen this unfold plenty of times.Marty wrote:NO.
Being tough does not require bully or demeaning behavior. It is no longer acceptable in schools or the workplace. If you cannot lead your life to that level ... then face the possible loss of a job or lawsuits.
There is no need to be a bully. Have a coach-player-parent meeting early on and lay out the rules and any disciplinary actions (especially those tougher than MSHSL) out in written form. Communicate with the players (kids) why they are not playing or playing less. The coach should then follow his rules whether it is his first line center or back up goalie.
If a player makes a mistake on or off the ice and he misses a shift, a period or a game ... it can be done and done sternly ... but with out being demeaning.
A HS coach is foremost a teacher. Set the example, lead by example.
If the behavior of a coach is not allowed by teachers in the school nor students in the school then it should not be allowed in the locker room or on the ice.
Do coaches break the anti-bully rules. Sure ... as parents, coaches, supervisors ... we all have done things wrong or wish we could do it over. It is those with a pattern of bully behavior that should be removed.
Legendary in his own eyes.JohnnyBuck wrote:I once asked a legendary coach why he does not get back into coaching. He left during his prime, was well respected in the community and won several championships. He still enjoyed both the game and the kids. His answer to my question was this............ "Son, when I coached several years ago the parents use to drop their kids off at practice and say to me, 'if my child gives you any trouble you let me know!', today parents drop their kids off at practice and say to the child, 'if the coach gives you any trouble you let me know!' ".
Sums it up right there.
illhaveanother wrote:I have noticed a trend, are we as parents willing to call our coach a bully ?
If so would Herb ever been able to coach?
Marty wrote:illhaveanother wrote:I have noticed a trend, are we as parents willing to call our coach a bully ?
If so would Herb ever been able to coach?
So if you read between the lines in Miracle, much of Brooks' behavior was attributed or tied to him having the team (used to beating each other up in the college ranks) rally together as a team rather than be individuals.
Those who know Brooks or played for him at SCSU or Minnesota would be better off commenting on his personality as a college coach. He was certainly successful at UM accounting for 3 National Titles. Was the coach in Miracle how Brooks always approachedcoaching ?
I'm not sure he failed at the NHL level. I think he was way ahead of mentality of the league and how it he visioned it should be. I think the last stint with the penquins he opened it up and brought some real entertainment to the game. I read where his players said it was the most fun they had playing at that level. People would rather watch s 5-4 game with 30 shots/per team than a 2-1 game with 30 total shots.
But he failed as a NHL coach where obviously he had to coach adult men.