Page 1 of 1

1-6 Lets Play Hockey Rankings

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:39 pm
by Grovetown Scotty
Very interesting White Bear ahead of Moorhead and Duluth East ahead of Elk River.<br><br><br><br><br> <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.letsplayhockey.com/882ranksw ... <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... >Grovetown Scotty</A> at: 1/5/06 2:41 pm<br></i>

Re: 1-6 Lets Play Hockey Rankings

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:48 pm
by gr19
Who votes for their rankings? When you think they can't get any more stupid...<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rolleyes --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eyes.gif ALT=":rolleyes"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

Re: 1-6 Lets Play Hockey Rankings

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:04 pm
by TG663303
Ya the only part of the rankings that I agree with is Holy Angels at 1 and Hill-Murray at 2. Everything else is just messed up. <p></p><i></i>

Re: 1-6 Lets Play Hockey Rankings

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:17 pm
by wbmd
Their ratings are a joke and always have been. <p></p><i></i>

Re: 1-6 Lets Play Hockey Rankings

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:38 pm
by gr19
Those rankings are so bad I hope everyone goes to their web site and emails them and completely bashes them for being so retarded. <p></p><i></i>

Ratings

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:40 pm
by brickwall33
can somebody post the new rating on here.... <p></p><i></i>

Re: Ratings

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:43 pm
by WBLBEARS06
1. Holy Angels<br>2. Hill Murray<br>3. Centennial<br>4. White Bear Lake<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :eek --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eek.gif ALT=":eek"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br>5. Jefferson<br>6. Moorhead<br>7. Eden Prairie<br>8. Duluth East<br>9. Cretin DH<br>10. Elk River<br>11. Apple Valley<br>12. Cloquet<br>13. Blaine<br>14. Minnetonka<br>15. Brainerd <p>The curse lives on.....</p><i></i>

re: rankings

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:47 pm
by Ibleedgreen
lph is a rag. it's only useful purpose is for parents to show what bad writers they are by submitting stories with their son's names in them. <p></p><i></i>

Re: Ratings

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:48 pm
by gr19
1. Holy Angels<br>2. Hill Murray<br>3. Centennial<br>4. White Bear Lake <br>5. Jefferson<br>6. Moorhead-wrong ^<br>7. Eden Prairie<br>8. Duluth East-wrong v<br>9. Cretin DH-wrong v<br>10. Elk River-wrong v<br>11. Apple Valley<br>12. Cloquet-wrong ^<br>13. Blaine<br>14. Minnetonka<br>15. Brainerd-right... <p></p><i></i>

Re: Ratings

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 5:04 pm
by Eddie Shore
Say what you will about LPH, but they have some well-respected AA coaches that submit their rankings on a weekly basis. These are some of the same coaches that many of you tout as being brilliant. So they are the "dumb" ones as it turns out. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rolleyes --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eyes.gif ALT=":rolleyes"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

Re: Ratings

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 5:10 pm
by elliott70
And they are based on opinion.<br><br>Look at the ratings that 'we' post on this site.<br>Can you find two that are identical? <p></p><i></i>

Re: Ratings

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 5:13 pm
by Ibleedgreen
just means that they are bad judges of talent on other teams too. <p></p><i></i>

Re: Ratings

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 6:21 pm
by boblee
Has anyone seen 16-20? <p><br><br>_________________<br><br>BOB</p><i></i>

Re: Ratings

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 6:46 pm
by breakaway shot
is grand rapids not on their because their only 6-6? must make sense <p></p><i></i>

Re: Ratings

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 6:55 pm
by gr19
If it's based on record then St. Francis and Cambridge should be in the top 5.<br><br>Also, breakaway shot, If team A is undefeated vs. teams B, C, and D, should team A be rated below all three of B, C, and D? <p></p><i></i>

Re: Rankings

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 7:06 pm
by benc14
Rapids has beaten 3 of those teams in the top 15 <p></p><i></i>

Re: Rankings

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 7:11 pm
by PuckU126
Rapids should at <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>least</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> be 12.<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :smokin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smokin.gif ALT=":smokin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

Re: Rankings

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 7:20 pm
by gr19
thank you pucku126. It's not like the GR fans are asking for a 3-9 team with a weak schedule to be ranked. And 12 would be perfectly fine, much higher and it would be unbalanced the other way. <p></p><i></i>

Re: Rankings

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 7:26 pm
by PuckU126
You’re welcome GR19.<br><br>As for Rapids, you have to give credit, when credit is due.<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :smokin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smokin.gif ALT=":smokin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

Rankings

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 7:33 pm
by SolanumTuberosum
Give LPH a break, they try their best...for the most part they are pretty accurate. look at the rankings some guys on this board have come up with...here's one example that was just recently posted...<br><br>1.AHA<br>2.HILL MURRAY<br>3.GRAND RAPIDS<br>4.CENTENNIAL<br>5.BLOOMINGTON JEFFERSON<br>6.EDEN PRAIRIE<br>7.CRETIN DERHAM HALL<br>8.LAKEVILLE NORTH<br>9.ROSEAU<br>10.BRAINERD<br><br>Grand Rapids 3? <br>Moorhead where?<br>WBL where? <br>Lakeville North 8?<br>Eden Prairie 6? <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... berosum</A> at: 1/5/06 7:39 pm<br></i>

Re: Rankings

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 7:42 pm
by PuckU126
I wouldn't take those rankings too seriously... the only reason why he put Grand Rapids at No.3 was for sympathy... I know this because it says so right by the name Grand Rapids. <br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>(SYMPATHY VOTE FOR GR19)<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Plus I agree the Spuds and the Bears should be up there too but he may have forgotten them? Just don't forget these are other people's opinions... not everyone is going to agree.<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :smokin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smokin.gif ALT=":smokin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

GR19

Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 3:32 pm
by sfg16
GR19 & PuckU<br> Are you guys for real? You say a team like CDH being number 9 is crazy, however grand rapids should be AT WORST 12. From what I hear grand rapids is 6-6, even with a tough schedule. CDH is 11-1 now, with a 5-0 record in a highly respected Suburban East Conference. I think 9 for CDH is a decent position for them in the state. Grand Rapids being any where near them, maybe even ahead in the rankings is just absurd. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... 6>sfg16</A> at: 1/7/06 3:35 pm<br></i>

you wanna know what's absurd?

Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 4:12 pm
by MajinHockey
I'll tell you what's absurd. People getting bent out of shape because they think that rankings actually mean something. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :\ --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/ohwell.gif ALT=":\"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

Re: Rankings

Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 4:21 pm
by PuckU126
<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>GR19 & PuckU<br>Are you guys for real? You say a team like CDH being number 9 is crazy, however grand rapids should be AT WORST 12. From what I hear grand rapids is 6-6, even with a tough schedule. CDH is 11-1 now, with a 5-0 record in a highly respected Suburban East Conference. I think 9 for CDH is a decent position for them in the state. Grand Rapids being any where near them, maybe even ahead in the rankings is just absurd.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br>I never said anything about CDH being ranked 9 was crazy... they should be ranked higher based on their record and accomplishments you stated above. Plus Rapids should be ranked 12 regardless of a 6-6 record. <br>Look at who they <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>defeated:</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Cloquet (4-3), Brainerd (4-2), Elk River (3-2), and Lakeville North (2-1)<br>Plus in some of the games <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>they did lose</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->, they were not far behind… <br>Apple Valley (1-0), Moorhead (4-2), Eden Prairie (2-1).<br>These loses indicate Rapids was still in the game and they were not out matched by higher ranked teams in the state.<br><br>Read the posts carefully buddy and THINK. PLUS like what I said before: WE ALL HAVE DIFFERENT OPINIONS!!! <br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :smokin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smokin.gif ALT=":smokin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>