Page 1 of 2

A Quarterfinal: Chisago Lakes vs. #3 New Prague

Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2014 3:02 pm
by karl(east)
CHISAGO LAKES VS. #3 NEW PRAGUE
-This isn’t a game that features any big names, but it is a Class A purist’s dream, featuring two small towns with little history of hockey success.

Chisago Lakes (20-8, unranked, 1-seed in 5A)
State appearances: 2 (first since 1995)
Key section win: 5-4 over 2-seed Princeton
-New Prague is a favorable draw for the Wildcats, who came out of a depleted Section 5A. Brandon Gillespie (14), Trevor Lushanko (7), and Blake Lizotte (28) form a productive top line, and while their depth isn’t great, they aren’t the thinnest team in the field, either. Goaltender Jake Dubose (31) has good numbers. They played reasonably well against some mid-level AA teams, so they shouldn’t be blown out, but it’s hard to identify an obvious strength they might ride to an upset.

New Prague (21-4-3, #6, 1-seed in 1A)
First State appearance
Key section win: 3-2 over #7 Mankato West
-The Trojans put together their strongest season in school history this year, and while they lacked the star power of fellow 1A frontrunner Mankato West, they’re into their first Tourney with a gritty, grinding squad that managed to nab the 3-seed. Augie Isaacson (26), Seth Kriha (24), Alex Grigor (10), and Austin Kilian (18) lead the attack. Goaltender Conner Wagner (1) will be key to their hopes, especially if they wind up with a semifinal against Hermantown. They have decent depth and a strong power play, though the penalty kill has been a concern, and they’re going to need to lock down to handle some of the tougher offenses in this field.

Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2014 3:14 pm
by Sats81
New Prague 3-2

Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2014 3:48 pm
by HockeyStorm
How does a team that gets outplayed that bad in the section final get the 3 seed???

Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2014 5:05 pm
by hockeydad
outshot, yes... outplayed, no..... and possibly becasue they seeded based on the whole body of work, not just one game. Only one loss by more than a goal, all four losses to section finalists (Farmington, Cathedral, Hermantown and Eagan) I was surprised they got the three seed over Cathedral, but felt sure they would be no lower than four.

New Prague vs. Chisago

Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2014 7:08 pm
by blueblood
New Prague too big and too strong and too deep

New Prague - 4
Chisago Lakes - 1

Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2014 10:14 pm
by urban iceman
HockeyStorm wrote:How does a team that gets outplayed that bad in the section final get the 3 seed???
If you were at the game you would know they weren't outplayed at all. They took that 3-0 lead and played clamp down defense for the rest of the majority of the game.Most of Mankato's shots came from wide angles, tho they did have some nice chances that Wagner stonewalled them on. NP missed a early wide open net and a breakaway or they could of been up 5-0 by the second period. MW had a missed opportunity wide open net to tie with about 30 sec left in game.

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 8:07 am
by urban iceman
Good luck to both teams today, but GO TROJAN'S!! :)

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 8:13 am
by MrBoDangles
4-3 Chisago

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 1:35 pm
by TTpuckster
Bump it up, Man..

Not seeing a lot of comments on this one Karl..

You may have to keep us posted.

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 1:43 pm
by dueling21
Lots of Chisago Lakes fans wearing green across the way...and plenty of maroon beneath us. Good to see some new blood get fired up for the tourney.

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 1:45 pm
by SouthernMinnFan
New Prague's back pressure is what won them the section final game. They take away time and space well and force teams to move up the ice quicker than they would like and dump pucks as opposed to carrying it in the zone. I like New Ulm barring too many penalties given up. 4-2

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 1:49 pm
by TTpuckster
SouthernMinnFan wrote:New Prague's back pressure is what won them the section final game. They take away time and space well and force teams to move up the ice quicker than they would like and dump pucks as opposed to carrying it in the zone. I like New Ulm barring too many penalties given up. 4-2
New Ulm? :shock:

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 1:56 pm
by ER17
What is the symbol on the CL jerseys?

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 1:56 pm
by OU812
New Prague has had great coaching with Chris Lonke. As for on ice talent, in the section final, NP goalie Wagner was beyond stellar - as Lonke said afterwards, talking about NP making it to state, "without Wagner, we aren't having this conversation". Anything like that level of performance in nets by Wagner today, and I don't see how Chisago Lakes can get a win.

Best guess:

NP 3
Chisago Lakes 1

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 2:02 pm
by MrBoDangles
:x

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 2:08 pm
by greybeard58
any score

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 2:09 pm
by east hockey
greybeard58 wrote:any score
Chisago Lakes just went up 1-0 at the 5:27 mark.

Lee

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 2:10 pm
by BlueLineSpecial
Just saw the Chisago mascot. So, is the team name the angry squirrels? Because that's what it looks like

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 2:12 pm
by ER17
Nice kick in on the goal, announcers didnt even mention it after 4 or 5 replays.

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 2:19 pm
by Sats81
1-1 NP ties it up.

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 2:21 pm
by flash4000
This game is being played at 1/2 the speed of the first one.

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 2:28 pm
by BlueOx
ER17 wrote:Nice kick in on the goal, announcers didnt even mention it after 4 or 5 replays.
That was the most blatant kick I have ever seen. How does the ref standing right there not see it? How do the officials award the goal to someone who never touches it? The CL players all knew who "scored" when they rushed to him. Nobody else can figure it out?

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 2:29 pm
by MrBoDangles
I was thinking a very sloppy higher speed....

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 2:34 pm
by nahc
Housley is a bit arrogant........

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 2:46 pm
by BlueLineSpecial
Angry Squirrels give up two quick goals to start the second. Yikes.