Page 1 of 4
Scrimmage scores and summaries
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 3:55 pm
by TheHockeyDJ
Just tweeted by grhshockey: Grand Rapids 3, Hill-Murray 0. Avery Peterson with 2 goals.
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 4:06 pm
by old goalie85
I heard Hill had bus legs.

Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 4:15 pm
by Pioneerprideguy
old goalie85 wrote:I heard Hill had bus legs.

Unlike Forest Lake, our kids play football in November.

Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 4:47 pm
by old goalie85
And hockey in march.

Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 8:21 pm
by MNhockey29
Forest lake 0- Hill Murray 1
Forest Lake 1- Grand Rapids 1
Great intensity between FL and GR with great goaltending. There was also a fight.
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 8:41 pm
by TheHockeyDJ
If this is any indication of how things will go 7AA may have 6 teams in the top 20 when the playoffs roll around. Though, I wonder if Rapids sat anyone after the Hill Murray scrimmage.
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:22 pm
by MNhockey29
Grand Rapids had the same roster for both games
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:28 pm
by TennJed
GR sat the presumably 2nd line of Bischoff,Magni and Frazier. And possiby one of top 3 d. Sat top line in Hibbing match in evening. 1-1.
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:39 pm
by pioneers
H-M 6 Hibbing 0
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:41 pm
by pioneers
old goalie85 wrote:I heard Hill had bus legs.

They did get off to a slow start. Played better as the scrimmage went along. I think GR only suited 15 players.
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 11:43 pm
by old goalie85
Sounds like the Rangers played well. We will know more after Cloquet/Stilly tomorrow.
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 5:44 am
by Zamman
old goalie85 wrote:Sounds like the Rangers played well. We will know more after Cloquet/Stilly tomorrow.
These scrimmages mean nothing. Wait till next week when the season really starts. These scrimmages are there for the coaches to evaluate their players and some players who are bubble players. Enjoy the scrimmages since we are now moving to the season. Argue who is going to win sections later...
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 6:38 am
by mnmouth
Zamman wrote:old goalie85 wrote:Sounds like the Rangers played well. We will know more after Cloquet/Stilly tomorrow.
These scrimmages mean nothing. Wait till next week when the season really starts. These scrimmages are there for the coaches to evaluate their players and some players who are bubble players. Enjoy the scrimmages since we are now moving to the season. Argue who is going to win sections later...
Best post yet this year, Zammer.
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 7:39 am
by oldschoolpuckster
Exactly!!
These games are used for player evaluation more than anything else. These are less important (meaning) games than NFL preseason games. Have fun watching the kids play and compete again.
Cloquet 2 Forest Lake 0 Final
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 9:03 am
by kniven
old goalie85 wrote:Sounds like the Rangers played well. We will know more after Cloquet/Stilly tomorrow.
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 9:31 am
by Zamman
Just a note, my post was not to slam anyone. More that we should not be trying to figure out who is winning state by the first week scrimmages. Give game summaries and player summaries. Win or lose, it does not matter.
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:45 am
by TheHockeyDJ
Zamman, you are imagining how serious some of us are taking the scrimmages. Just talking about scores doesn't mean we give this a lot of weight. Some of us are just happy to be talking hockey again after waiting for 8+ months. Don't be hating because Forest Lake has a better shot at state than the Stars.

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:18 am
by old goalie85
That's what I said "we will know more later". Yes I guess we will know a ton more in April.

Cloquet 3 Stillwater 3 Final
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:20 am
by kniven
...
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:25 am
by The Best in the Bizz3
WBL 2 AHA 0
Bears playing well with wahlen and delaney. Good depth but surprised by the stars who without Mork, Bianchi and Haeg (sitting out of tryouts) played very well and many will be surprised with the depth at the forward position this year. D were alright, goalies very good.
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:40 am
by HockeyWatcher10
The Best in the Bizz3 wrote:WBL 2 AHA 0
Bears playing well with wahlen and delaney. Good depth but surprised by the stars who without Mork, Bianchi and Haeg (sitting out of tryouts) played very well and many will be surprised with the depth at the forward position this year. D were alright, goalies very good.
Who scored for the Bears?
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 12:10 pm
by The Best in the Bizz3
HockeyWatcher10 wrote:The Best in the Bizz3 wrote:WBL 2 AHA 0
Bears playing well with wahlen and delaney. Good depth but surprised by the stars who without Mork, Bianchi and Haeg (sitting out of tryouts) played very well and many will be surprised with the depth at the forward position this year. D were alright, goalies very good.
Who scored for the Bears?
I couldn't tell you, I'm fairly positive it was their 2nd or 3rd line players
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 12:54 pm
by Edgy
In Eden Prairie:
Duluth East over EP
Jefferson over Eagan - penalty filled.....
Prior Lake over Duluth East
Benilde and Eagan were in process - update later.
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 1:33 pm
by Edgy
[quote="Edgy"]In Eden Prairie:
Duluth East over EP
Jefferson over Eagan - penalty filled.....
Prior Lake over Duluth East
Benilde and Eagan were in process - update later.[/quote
Sorry should have said Blaine ( not benilde) and Blaine beat eagan
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 1:36 pm
by Edgy
Eagan now beating centenial
Eden prairie and prior lake starting now