How not to win friends and influence people in WBL.
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 8:12 am
He wont play his Seniors last year so he just cuts them this year for Freshman!
Man!

The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://ushsho.com/forums/
Coaches do what they believe will help their team win, which improves their chance of keeping their jobs. They are not in the loyalty business.Napalm187 wrote:There is no loyalty anymore.
MNHockeyFan wrote:Coaches do what they believe will help their team win, which improves their chance of keeping their job. They are not in the loyalty business.Napalm187 wrote:There is no loyalty anymore.
Ha ha ha.MNHockeyFan wrote:MNHockeyFan wrote:Coaches do what they believe will help their team win, which improves their chance of keeping their job. They are not in the loyalty business.Napalm187 wrote:There is no loyalty anymore.
Can you list the HS coaches that prefer to play/keep their seniors over a younger player with similar talent? doesnt seem to be the "in" thing to do these days...buzzershot wrote:He wont play his Seniors last year so he just cuts them this year for Freshman!Man!
This is ridiculous to me. I am no Sager supporter, but at some point the "everyone gets a trophy" mentality needs to end, and the people that get left behind need to either work harder or live with it, parents of those kids included.buzzershot wrote:He wont play his Seniors last year so he just cuts them this year for Freshman!Man!
1 Freshman 8 sophomores 3 juniors and 8 seniorsstpaul wrote:Some detail would help. Were any seniors with varsity experience cut? How many freshman made the varsity?
Disagree. If the senior is better now (next year is irrelevant) then he should get the chance to play for his school over the freshamn/sophomore. That's what JV is for. Too many prima donna kids think they should get to play as youngsters just because they played on A teams all the way up. Often (not always) their bodies are not physically ready for the pounding. Very few freashman - maybe a dozen a year or so - are ready to make an impact. For the most part they should develop at JV. But now days they'll threaten to transfer instead holding the varsity coach hostage. More should be secure enough in their jobs to show them the door.meridian90 wrote:This is ridiculous to me. I am no Sager supporter, but at some point the "everyone gets a trophy" mentality needs to end, and the people that get left behind need to either work harder or live with it, parents of those kids included.buzzershot wrote:He wont play his Seniors last year so he just cuts them this year for Freshman!Man!
Coaches need to ask themselves one question: which kid gives me the better chance for success now and in the future? If it's the younger player, they make the team, if not then take the older player.
If a senior is better than a freshman, yes you keep the senior. A freshman will be better off playing Bantams over JV anyway, since they get so many more games. As a sophomore though, if you are on the same skill level as a senior, I would take the sophomore.Bluewhitefan wrote:Disagree. If the senior is better now (next year is irrelevant) then he should get the chance to play for his school over the freshamn/sophomore. That's what JV is for. Too many prima donna kids think they should get to play as youngsters just because they played on A teams all the way up. Often (not always) their bodies are not physically ready for the pounding. Very few freashman - maybe a dozen a year or so - are ready to make an impact. For the most part they should develop at JV. But now days they'll threaten to transfer instead holding the varsity coach hostage. More should be secure enough in their jobs to show them the door.meridian90 wrote:This is ridiculous to me. I am no Sager supporter, but at some point the "everyone gets a trophy" mentality needs to end, and the people that get left behind need to either work harder or live with it, parents of those kids included.buzzershot wrote:He wont play his Seniors last year so he just cuts them this year for Freshman!Man!
Coaches need to ask themselves one question: which kid gives me the better chance for success now and in the future? If it's the younger player, they make the team, if not then take the older player.
Agree. But, as meridian90 says, they should be playing bantam.Very few freashman - maybe a dozen a year or so - are ready to make an impact. For the most part they should develop at JV.
True, freshman should play Bantams if they can, and JV if they can't. Don't agree on sophomores - if they're not better than the senior, they should play JV. The problem at the big schools is the kids and the parents don't understand what JV is for, they think it's beneath their little superstar.observer wrote:Agree. But, as meridian90 says, they should be playing bantam.Very few freashman - maybe a dozen a year or so - are ready to make an impact. For the most part they should develop at JV.
Doesn't belong on this topic since WBL only has one 9th grader and historically has had a good Bantam A team where most every varsity star got his start.
So is this what you are suggesting?observer wrote:In the metro U16 would be great if all the schools and youth associations agreed on how to use it. Instead of all sophopmores, not making varsity, playing U16 it seems the top ones make JV leaving little left for U16.
I think you are right here. I also think that this is how it has to be, so long as MSHSL keeps a non-contact period in place before first day of high school practice/try-outs.observer wrote:Currently, I believe, most associations and high schools fill out U16 rosters after the JV roster which drops the U16 level below where it belongs.