How common is it?
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 2:18 pm
How common is it for a program to field a B1 and B2 but no A team?
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://ushsho.com/forums/
Extremely rare to none. The decision is likely up to the association which should know where each year's class of kids fit in their District competition but also state wide. B1 and C maybe.How common is it for a program to field a B1 and B2 but no A team?
No Bantam A...North St. Paul. My guess a few more out there.jpiehl wrote:It may be more common at squirts, I know a couple of years ago both St. Francis and Coon Rapids had a B1, B2, and C, and St. Francis has the same this year, too. Won't happen in District 5, though, because they have a rule that if you have more than one team at a level that you have to have an A team.
I would feel very sad, would need a kleenex box by me for every game. Because the game of hockey is all about feelings now isn`t it.dangle_snipe wrote:How would you feel if you were to go to a peewee B tournament and play a team that was A calliber but opted down to play B1?
That may be the case sometimes, but two years ago when Coon Rapids and St. Francis both decided to not have a Squirt A, and instead ran B1, B2, and C, it ended up with Coon Rapids vs. St. Francis for the District 10 title, so they were both clearly not doing it because they felt they couldn't compete, they just wanted to have hardware teams. And St. Francis is doing it again this year, so it isn't like they had to do it to compete in D10 and ended up winning out of district games, both rolled over their D10 schedules, too.Cowboy wrote:I would guess that it has happened quite a few times over the years in D10. The reason is the wide range of program sizes. There are several associations that may have 20-30 kids at a level and if they go 'A' they will end up losing most of their games by 10 or more goals. Even going 'B1' they will struggle to make the D10 playoffs. But if they go to some smaller tournaments the 'B1' team may be out of place.
The new 'A' and 'AA' experiment this year in D10 at the bantam level appears to have worked out well so it may no longer be an issue if the rule is adopted statewide.
Hardware teams at B1 SQ? really!? How is CR doing this year in PWA? they have 3 wins. It's pretty much the same team, minus 1 player, as it was 2 years ago at B1 SQ. They were hardly "hardware" chasing. They are trying to put the kids in the best possible position to compete, have fun and develope.jpiehl wrote:That may be the case sometimes, but two years ago when Coon Rapids and St. Francis both decided to not have a Squirt A, and instead ran B1, B2, and C, it ended up with Coon Rapids vs. St. Francis for the District 10 title, so they were both clearly not doing it because they felt they couldn't compete, they just wanted to have hardware teams. And St. Francis is doing it again this year, so it isn't like they had to do it to compete in D10 and ended up winning out of district games, both rolled over their D10 schedules, too.Cowboy wrote:I would guess that it has happened quite a few times over the years in D10. The reason is the wide range of program sizes. There are several associations that may have 20-30 kids at a level and if they go 'A' they will end up losing most of their games by 10 or more goals. Even going 'B1' they will struggle to make the D10 playoffs. But if they go to some smaller tournaments the 'B1' team may be out of place.
The new 'A' and 'AA' experiment this year in D10 at the bantam level appears to have worked out well so it may no longer be an issue if the rule is adopted statewide.