Legacy Hockey
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:09 pm
I heard Legacy hockey folded has anyone got any information on that 

The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://ushsho.com/forums/
MrBoDangles wrote:There will be a lot of little refugees around.
They had the best beer hall receptions ever!
the attached Bar was sweet![]()
Hockey41- I assume you were a paying customer? I also thought this program had some good programs. After reading what you wrote, now I know why.HockeyDad41 wrote:If this is confirmed, I wouldn't be surprised. The business model of charging one of the highest fees per hour of any program out there combined with the practice of leaving your paying players at home to bring in non-paying players to compete in tournaments is enough to make the most careless consumer scratch his head. Top it off with cheesey $10 jerseys for the kids to wear and you have pretty much disappointed everyone involved.
Other than Legacy, what are some other programs who have been bringing non-paying players to compete in tournaments? Have heard MADE move players around to squeeze winnings. The above is a good question and I for one did not ask.Irish wrote:Hockey41- I assume you were a paying customer? I also thought this program had some good programs. After reading what you wrote, now I know why.HockeyDad41 wrote:If this is confirmed, I wouldn't be surprised. The business model of charging one of the highest fees per hour of any program out there combined with the practice of leaving your paying players at home to bring in non-paying players to compete in tournaments is enough to make the most careless consumer scratch his head. Top it off with cheesey $10 jerseys for the kids to wear and you have pretty much disappointed everyone involved.
That is one of the first things to ask a program. Will they bring any other players in during the season to play in tournaments?
Tan pants or shorts and the white "Legacy Hockey" polo was their requirement.Rick O'Shay wrote:Sounds like the only thing they left out was making their eight year olds wear a tie to their games!!!!
Common for them to bring in a goalie for trnysIrish wrote:At the younger ages it's a learning experience. Asz the years go by the kids will be placed on teams that best fit their level of play or parents check book.
I've never heard of the Made bringing in players to play in tournaments.
Oh, yes. It is true. Little Billy (not Johnny) will be guaranteed say 3 tournaments, but the team might play in 5 (this is just an example). Then they do the invitational tourney with their beefed up team and still never finish above third. Legacy isn't the only team that does it, but they are one of the worst. Nice player development. It's notorious at the '99 level.Mnhockeys wrote:Other than Legacy, what are some other programs who have been bringing non-paying players to compete in tournaments? Have heard MADE move players around to squeeze winnings. The above is a good question and I for one did not ask.Irish wrote:Hockey41- I assume you were a paying customer? I also thought this program had some good programs. After reading what you wrote, now I know why.HockeyDad41 wrote:If this is confirmed, I wouldn't be surprised. The business model of charging one of the highest fees per hour of any program out there combined with the practice of leaving your paying players at home to bring in non-paying players to compete in tournaments is enough to make the most careless consumer scratch his head. Top it off with cheesey $10 jerseys for the kids to wear and you have pretty much disappointed everyone involved.
That is one of the first things to ask a program. Will they bring any other players in during the season to play in tournaments?
This is why parents must do research on the program before they write the check. We finally found a home after four years of searching.hockeygoof1 wrote:Oh, yes. It is true. Little Billy (not Johnny) will be guaranteed say 3 tournaments, but the team might play in 5 (this is just an example). Then they do the invitational tourney with their beefed up team and still never finish above third. Legacy isn't the only team that does it, but they are one of the worst. Nice player development. It's notorious at the '99 level.Mnhockeys wrote:Other than Legacy, what are some other programs who have been bringing non-paying players to compete in tournaments? Have heard MADE move players around to squeeze winnings. The above is a good question and I for one did not ask.Irish wrote: Hockey41- I assume you were a paying customer? I also thought this program had some good programs. After reading what you wrote, now I know why.
That is one of the first things to ask a program. Will they bring any other players in during the season to play in tournaments?
Stringing families along? You're kidding me? Please tell me you're not that naive, or you have a sense of humor and I missed it.MrBoDangles wrote:You would think a Legacy representative would make things clear on here. You want to talk about some bad press.
I sure hope they're not stringing families along.
Talked to some D2 families at the rink this week who have mite/squirt age kids planning to "play with Legacy this Spring". Not sure if they've already written the checks. Noone had heard about it folding, at least not at the younger ages. Noticed Legacy is sponsoring the White Bear Lake mite teams. So if Legacy has indeed folded, there looks to be plenty of people that didn't get the message.hockeygoof1 wrote:Stringing families along? You're kidding me? Please tell me you're not that naive, or you have a sense of humor and I missed it.MrBoDangles wrote:You would think a Legacy representative would make things clear on here. You want to talk about some bad press.
I sure hope they're not stringing families along.
Hard to collect checks if they come on here and say things are up in the air.hockeygoof1 wrote:Stringing families along? You're kidding me? Please tell me you're not that naive, or you have a sense of humor and I missed it.MrBoDangles wrote:You would think a Legacy representative would make things clear on here. You want to talk about some bad press.
I sure hope they're not stringing families along.
Well, where there's smoke . . .MrBoDangles wrote:Hard to collect checks if they come on here and say things are up in the air.hockeygoof1 wrote:Stringing families along? You're kidding me? Please tell me you're not that naive, or you have a sense of humor and I missed it.MrBoDangles wrote:You would think a Legacy representative would make things clear on here. You want to talk about some bad press.
I sure hope they're not stringing families along.