HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Did anything get decided on moving the age cut-off? Elliott?

It wasn't on the agenda. From what I know, it is a dead subject.

I view recruiting new players as the most important function of all youth hockey associations yet it's interesting and unfortunate that there was no recruiting committee meeting. I'm pretty sure there is a recruiting committee. Maybe it's called something else? How can you have a member organization and not discuss attracting new members?

http://assets.ngin.com/attachments/docu ... _1__1_.pdf

More members solve everything. More players mean more revenue and more and better volunteers. Two things every association could use.

observer wrote:I view recruiting new players as the most important function of all youth hockey associations yet it's interesting and unfortunate that there was no recruiting committee meeting. I'm pretty sure there is a recruiting committee. Maybe it's called something else? How can you have a member organization and not discuss attracting new members?

http://assets.ngin.com/attachments/docu ... _1__1_.pdf

More members solve everything. More players mean more revenue and more and better volunteers. Two things every association could use.

It'd be interesting to see the results of the survey that went out to those that played in 09-10 but not in 10-11.