
Varsity ice time versus JV ice time
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:24 am
Varsity ice time versus JV ice time
I was wondering if this is normal for our high school hockey team to have 2 hours and 45 minutes set aside for each practice with JV getting 45 minutes and varsity getting 2 hours. JV and varsity are not intermixed either at all. I don't see skills being improved much on the JV team. Just wondering if this is pretty normal around the state? 

Re: Varsity ice time versus JV ice time
Ridiculous. They should be practicing together. 45 mins just wrong.SportsNorthFan wrote:I was wondering if this is normal for our high school hockey team to have 2 hours and 45 minutes set aside for each practice with JV getting 45 minutes and varsity getting 2 hours. JV and varsity are not intermixed either at all. I don't see skills being improved much on the JV team. Just wondering if this is pretty normal around the state?
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 2:45 pm
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:17 pm
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 3:44 pm
I disagree many teams practice jv and varsity together.... JV players develop faster because they are playing with better competition in practice this also makes competetion for spots way more competitiveGeno Snipes wrote:First off, having them practice together would result in way too many kids out on the ice and nothing would get done. Secondly, there is no JV state tournament.
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:42 pm
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:17 pm
You have a very good point. But i think that's why JV and varsity usually practice together at the beginning of the season, when guys are still competing for a lot of spots. Once the season gets going it needs to be seperate though.truehockeyfan wrote:I disagree many teams practice jv and varsity together.... JV players develop faster because they are playing with better competition in practice this also makes competetion for spots way more competitiveGeno Snipes wrote:First off, having them practice together would result in way too many kids out on the ice and nothing would get done. Secondly, there is no JV state tournament.
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 9:19 pm
Re: Varsity ice time versus JV ice time
Not normal. Usually its an hour each of ice and maybe a half hour of dryland/weights.SportsNorthFan wrote:I was wondering if this is normal for our high school hockey team to have 2 hours and 45 minutes set aside for each practice with JV getting 45 minutes and varsity getting 2 hours. JV and varsity are not intermixed either at all. I don't see skills being improved much on the JV team. Just wondering if this is pretty normal around the state?
ice time
Up north we have 3 hours scheduled to be divided as needed. Normally 1.5 hours for Varsity and JV. If the varsity coach feels more time is warranted to work with the Varsity then he schedules it that way. There are also times when he may feel an hour is ample time and then gives the extra time to the JV.
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 12:51 pm
-
- Posts: 3696
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm
Variables to consider.
It looks as though it comes to a monetary situation and/or its falls on to the discretion of the DA or the varsity coach. Regardless it appears there is no "normal" time amount nor what the teams do for practice. Most programs have their differences compared to another.
The Puck
LGW
LGW
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 12:01 pm
false. In the bigtime schools JV is filled with sophomores chomping at the bit to crack the varsity roster. That creates good competition at that level. Many premier players have paid their dues at the JV ranks. The small schools, yes it is a "joke." At schools such as Wayzata, Edina, etc. JV is not a jokeReggie wrote:JV hockey for the most part is a joke.
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
Hockey is different than most sports. Many sports have fresh, soph, and maybe A, B or C fresh teams. Many times, if you are not good enough to make varsity by the time you are a senior, you are not someone who will contribute as a senior. In a sport like football, you can be on the roster, but in hockey that would mean JV as a senior.formerplayer37 wrote:false. In the bigtime schools JV is filled with sophomores chomping at the bit to crack the varsity roster. That creates good competition at that level. Many premier players have paid their dues at the JV ranks. The small schools, yes it is a "joke." At schools such as Wayzata, Edina, etc. JV is not a jokeReggie wrote:JV hockey for the most part is a joke.
So, it is not a joke, but in many cases, it can be a place for players who will not be good enough to play varsity to continue to play the sport they love.
Right there folks, is the statement of the CENTURY. Denny Greenism.HShockeywatcher wrote:Hockey is different than most sports. Many sports have fresh, soph, and maybe A, B or C fresh teams. Many times, if you are not good enough to make varsity by the time you are a senior, you are not someone who will contribute as a senior. In a sport like football, you can be on the roster, but in hockey that would mean JV as a senior.formerplayer37 wrote:false. In the bigtime schools JV is filled with sophomores chomping at the bit to crack the varsity roster. That creates good competition at that level. Many premier players have paid their dues at the JV ranks. The small schools, yes it is a "joke." At schools such as Wayzata, Edina, etc. JV is not a jokeReggie wrote:JV hockey for the most part is a joke.
So, it is not a joke, but in many cases, it can be a place for players who will not be good enough to play varsity to continue to play the sport they love.
