clutterbuck22 wrote:According to sources, Penn State has set up a press conference at 11:30 est tomorrow. There are many rumors flying around that this is a conference to announce that Penn State will have a new men's Ice Hockey team. They will play in the Big Ten hockey conference. They already have a division II program, but this makes the school have all sports in DI I think. What does this do to college hockey if anything?
Clutterbuck, this may shed some light on what's going on with Penn State:
From Roman Augustoviz's Gopher hockey blog in the Minneapolis Star Tribune:
College hockey world focuses on Penn State
Did you know Penn State was a men's hockey power?
Not in Division I hockey, but in club hockey. And now there is a buzz that the Nittany Lions will start a Division I program soon in men's and women's hockey.
INCH (Inside College Hockey), relying on anonymous sources, said an announcement could be coming as soon as Friday.
The Daily Collegian, the student newspaper on the University Park, Pa. campus, asked AD Tim Curley for comment on the speculation on Monday. He declined.
On Tuesday, the Daily Collegian reported that a source close to the club team, nicknamed the Icers, said something on when an announcement was coming would come out Wednesday.
Stay tuned, it seems, as this story unravels.
But back to the Icers. They were founded in 1971-72 and have become a power in Division I of the American College Hockey Association, that the governing body of the club teams and should not to be confused with the NCAA.
The Icers have won seven ACHA national titles, including four in a row from 2000-03. They also have been national runners-up nine times.
But they play in an arena called the Ice Pavilion, which seats, 1,350. Much too small for a Division I program. So before adding hockey, PSU needs a new arena. Last month the Altoona Mirror reported Penn State was planning to build an arena which would seat 6,000 to 8,000.
On the main campus alone, Penn State has 45,000 undergrads.
Last season Penn State's club team, seeded No. 2, lost in the quarterfinals of the national tournament, finishing with a 32-4-2 record under coach Scott Balboni. The Icers were No. 5 in the final national rankings. Oddly enough, Illinois, another Big Ten team, was No. 6 with a 27-10-2 mark.
Obviously, it would take a while for Penn State to get its men's and women's programs off the ground. The start-up season most commonly mentioned has been 2014-15.
But if Penn State adds hockey, it certainly could shake up two existing conferences, the WCHA and the CCHA.
With the Nittany Lions, there would be six Big Ten schools with hockey, the minimum needed for a conference to receive an automatic bid to the NCAA tournament.
The Big Ten Network would be drooling over the prospect of having conference hockey games to fill around its basketball coverage after the football season ends.
That's extra TV money and exposure for Big Ten schools. Always nice.
If Minnesota and Wisconsin joined the Big Ten Conference, the WCHA would be back to 10 schools which it had before adding Nebraska-Omaha and Bemidji State this season.
Michigan, Michigan State and Ohio State are the other three Big Ten schools with hockey programs and all are in the CCHA. Their leaving would reduce the number of teams in the CCHA to eight.
Of course, none of this is a done deal.
A six-team conference spread from Penn State to Minnesota might mean more travel for Big Ten Conference teams, depending partly on non-conference schedules. With a six-team league, every team would probably play the five other teams twice, in a home series and an away series, so that would be 20 conference games.
Each team would still have to schedule an additional 12-14 games. For Minnesota, that would almost have to include a series against North Dakota, a huge Gophers rival, and several other Minnesota teams.