The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://ushsho.com/forums/
Hopefully there are no girls on those teams or you will have some angry neanderthal dads complaining that their sons can't play on girls teams.sorno82 wrote:I sure hope these team haven't already been picked or you will have some angry grandpa's posting about the injustice.
Let the "Shenanigans" begin!sorno82 wrote:I sure hope these team haven't already been picked or you will have some angry grandpa's posting about the injustice.
The fun part's a given.MN_Hcky_Coach wrote:Shouldn't the question be "Which Squirt Team will have the most fun"?????
Snacks are a big part of that equation. There's a rumor floating around that Minnetonka is trying to get a kid from Hopkins to open enroll because his dad is a Pepsi driver - direct line to the Gatorade.MN_Hcky_Coach wrote:Shouldn't the question be "Which Squirt Team will have the most fun"?????
Rumor has it that talks are back on for merging CI and NB.MrBoDangles wrote:The former CINB would've had a much better team this year. Now I hear Cambridge is going to play A alone........ I feel bad for those kids
A few, in Cambridge, must have sat down and figured out just how ugly things will be in the future without a merge.steelheader wrote:Rumor has it that talks are back on for merging CI and NB.MrBoDangles wrote:The former CINB would've had a much better team this year. Now I hear Cambridge is going to play A alone........ I feel bad for those kids
Good luck changing NB minds now.Maybe, but without an arena of their own it is in NB best interests as well.MrBoDangles wrote:A few, in Cambridge, must have sat down and figured out just how ugly things will be in the future without a merge.steelheader wrote:Rumor has it that talks are back on for merging CI and NB.MrBoDangles wrote:The former CINB would've had a much better team this year. Now I hear Cambridge is going to play A alone........ I feel bad for those kids
The only negative is for the HS program....... It is currently very cheap to play for NB without the overhead of an arena. The mites will be in Isanti (we should of stayed away) and the traveling teams will be in East Bethel. Pine City even offered NB most of their prime ice hours, but NB declinedsteelheader wrote:Maybe, but without an arena of their own it is in NB best interests as well.MrBoDangles wrote:A few, in Cambridge, must have sat down and figured out just how ugly things will be in the future without a merge.steelheader wrote: Rumor has it that talks are back on for merging CI and NB.
. Kids in other local programs are getting priced out in this economy.. Kids in other local programs are getting priced out in this economy.I guess I don't understand your point. CI doesn't have the overhead of an arena either. They are a tenant only.steelheader wrote:[The only negative is for the HS program....... It is currently very cheap to play for NB without the overhead of an arena. The mites will be in Isanti (we should of stayed away) and the traveling teams will be in East Bethel. Pine City even offered NB most of their prime ice hours, but NB declined
We are in the best of shape and growing fast....!
I guess we're also only a tenant then ...... , but if we decide not to rent your (so called) ice you might not have a "home". Your association alone would not keep your "home arena" afloat, so what if we would have decided on Pine City? What will C-I have? 5 traveling teams for the rink?MrBoDangles wrote:I guess I don't understand your point. CI doesn't have the overhead of an arena either. They are a tenant only.steelheader wrote:[The only negative is for the HS program....... It is currently very cheap to play for NB without the overhead of an arena. The mites will be in Isanti (we should of stayed away) and the traveling teams will be in East Bethel. Pine City even offered NB most of their prime ice hours, but NB declined
We are in the best of shape and growing fast....!
The identity of your program hurts by not having a home. You have to admit that sending player to PC, Chisago, East Bethel and Isanti is not a good situation, whether you get prime time or not.
They would of had, or could have, one of the better teams in D10 this year.trippedovertheblueline wrote:I guess we're also only a tenant then ...... , but if we decide not to rent your (so called) ice you might not have a "home". Your association alone would not keep your "home arena" afloat, so what if we would have decided on Pine City? What will C-I have? 5 traveling teams for the rink?MrBoDangles wrote:I guess I don't understand your point. CI doesn't have the overhead of an arena either. They are a tenant only.steelheader wrote:[The only negative is for the HS program....... It is currently very cheap to play for NB without the overhead of an arena. The mites will be in Isanti (we should of stayed away) and the traveling teams will be in East Bethel. Pine City even offered NB most of their prime ice hours, but NB declined
We are in the best of shape and growing fast....!
The identity of your program hurts by not having a home. You have to admit that sending player to PC, Chisago, East Bethel and Isanti is not a good situation, whether you get prime time or not.
You might be able to find ice cheaper somewhere else and home is right on the scoreboard...... If you're just a tenant like you say with no financial worries.[/quote
So are these one of top squirt teams this fall/winter?
