The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://ushsho.com/forums/
How is Defiel looking?gophs16 wrote:2-2 after 2, two poor goals by park but stillwater really needs to pick up play. We will see a very physical third. Housleys got to get the boys going.
Is this final?gophs16 wrote:4-2 stillwater. 6 left in the housleys and mogren scoring last 2.
GFD had the score right, and knew Park was sneaky, but with the Ponies decent checking game, I am shocked at Park getting 34 shots..Goldfishdude wrote:Park is sneaky. and will create few scoring chances, but will capitalize on a couple breakways/2 on 1 breaks.
Stillwater 4-2, but Ponies will outshoot Park 26-19..
Youngy goal is a goal come on, soft goal, puck had eyes, I think the score book just says goal! Thats why you drop the puck and play. Let me guess all Stilly goals were picture perfect!! Second period Park had several good scoring chances.youngblood08 wrote:They may have had shots but none were real scoring chances. They had one that was a questionable high stick the other had eyes, it went through 9 guys before it reached the net Gordy never saw it. Park did have a couple of close ones.
justme wrote:Youngy goal is a goal come on, soft goal, puck had eyes, I think the score book just says goal! Thats why you drop the puck and play. Let me guess all Stilly goals were picture perfect!! Second period Park had several good scoring chances.youngblood08 wrote:They may have had shots but none were real scoring chances. They had one that was a questionable high stick the other had eyes, it went through 9 guys before it reached the net Gordy never saw it. Park did have a couple of close ones.
Ummm, maybe the Park goalie dad was tallying the shotsPioneerprideguy wrote:Bigger question, how do you allow Park 34 shots on goal??
??? Just kidding, but I would have to agree with youngblood that there were not many true scoring opportunities. However, after the Woodbury gaff 
(I mean game), it has become abundantly clear that the Ponies are still in need of a killer instinct.I remember maybe 3-4 "real" scoring chances for park and the 2 goals were pretty ridiculous. Most shots from park came in the second but that period was about even. Other then that Stillwater dominated but spooge you are correct, they need to know how to put teams away.Spooge wrote:Ummm, maybe the Park goalie dad was tallying the shotsPioneerprideguy wrote:Bigger question, how do you allow Park 34 shots on goal??
Easy youngy even with the QUESTIONABLE goal Stilly still won the game. Out of the 18 shots in the second period there was about 3 to 4 scoring chances yes or no. See the game the right way for once. I guess the puck must of put sun glasses on and thats why Park didn't get anymore goals. Remember your still the man!youngblood08 wrote:justme wrote:Youngy goal is a goal come on, soft goal, puck had eyes, I think the score book just says goal! Thats why you drop the puck and play. Let me guess all Stilly goals were picture perfect!! Second period Park had several good scoring chances.youngblood08 wrote:They may have had shots but none were real scoring chances. They had one that was a questionable high stick the other had eyes, it went through 9 guys before it reached the net Gordy never saw it. Park did have a couple of close ones.
What the heck are you talkin about? The 1st goal was QUESTIONABLE one the second was shot from the point and went through a mass of 9 other players, saying it had "eyes" to make it through that crowd. Park had a few other chances that were bouncing around the front of the net that no one could get a handle on. Out of the 34 shots how many were scoring chances? Don't read more into it.
