Page 1 of 2
mounds view vs woodbury
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 5:17 pm
by dreamonice
who will win
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 5:58 pm
by wblhockeyfan8
Woodbury 6-1
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:46 pm
by ToP PRoSP3cT
Royals by at least 3
?????
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 7:25 pm
by dreamonice
Not another chance for mv to pull an upset?
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 7:38 pm
by youngblood08
Ticks by 4
Re: ?????
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 7:39 pm
by Goldfishdude
dreamonice wrote:Not another chance for mv to pull an upset?
Not this game, but I think this will be a statement game as to what these teams will be like the rest of the year..
If Woodbury does win 4,5,6 -1 , it will look like they are ready to challenge for the top of the SEC... If it's a 2-1, 3-2, 4-2 game, that will be huge for MV for confidence to keep rolling. As we have stated, MV if 4-1-2 in its last 7... We'll see if it continues...
I think Woodbury 4-2..
Re: ?????
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 7:40 pm
by wbmd
dreamonice wrote:Not another chance for mv to pull an upset?
There's always a chance. I wouldn't be surprised to see Mounds View pull off the victory since Woodbury is not playing like they're capable of this season.
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 8:04 pm
by starmvp
Woodbury by 4
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:33 pm
by dreamonice
we'll see if mv can pull this off, they will put themselves in a good position for the last part of the year
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:30 pm
by Goldfishdude
dreamonice wrote:we'll see if mv can pull this off, they will put themselves in a good position for the last part of the year
There's no question, dreamer.... Even if it's a moral victory, that will be a bonus, but if MV can pull the MILD upset, that will give them all the confidence to finish top 3 in conference play.
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:42 pm
by brandy38
Woodbury by 3
If the Royals lose I'll go completely insane
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:43 pm
by Goldfishdude
brandy38 wrote:Woodbury by 3
If the Royals lose I'll go completely insane
Just make sure your not anywhere near Sunsets if that happens.. It might ruin my buzz..
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:59 pm
by qbtobe7
Goldfishdude wrote:Just make sure your not anywhere near Sunsets if that happens.. It might ruin my buzz..
All the Woodbury parents go to Ray Jay's after games, so you shouldn't have to worry.
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:06 pm
by PowerForward25
qbtobe7 wrote:Goldfishdude wrote:Just make sure your not anywhere near Sunsets if that happens.. It might ruin my buzz..
All the Woodbury parents go to Ray Jay's after games, so you shouldn't have to worry.

Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 6:28 pm
by gophers101
I was able to watch MV when they where up in Hibbing for the holiday tourney and their a very aggressive team. I know the Royals are struggling right now but I think they find a way to beat MV by two.
Royals-4
MV-2
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 6:48 pm
by Hankya
Should be a good match. MV has a lot of potential and is playing good hockey. Woodbury is strong up front with points. I have to think Woodbury by 2. Come on MV, prove me wrong.
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 6:58 pm
by wbmd
Mounds View with the upset by a goal.
Woodbury needs to get their act together (and soon) and play like they're capable of. Otherwise, they won't be going anywhere this year. Even the goaltending is down this season.
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:50 pm
by Goldfishdude
qbtobe7 wrote:Goldfishdude wrote:Just make sure your not anywhere near Sunsets if that happens.. It might ruin my buzz..
All the Woodbury parents go to
Ray Jay's after games, so you shouldn't have to worry.
Ahhhhhhhhhh... another close personal favorite of mine...
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 10:05 pm
by qbtobe7
Woodbury 2
Mounds View 1
Goals for Woodbury scored by Max Gaede and Walker Hyland.
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 10:10 pm
by dreamonice
close game but most of mv's shots weren't good scoring chances
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 10:22 pm
by slapstkhound
dreamonice wrote:close game but most of mv's shots weren't good scoring chances
Game wasn't as close as the score might indicate....controlled by Woodbury.
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 10:31 pm
by dreamonice
dreamonice wrote:
close game but most of mv's shots weren't good scoring chances
Game wasn't as close as the score might indicate....controlled by Woodbury.
both teams had chances and shots were close mv just couldn't bury a couple of big rebounds
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:02 pm
by Goldfishdude
slapstkhound wrote:dreamonice wrote:close game but most of mv's shots weren't good scoring chances
Game wasn't as close as the score might indicate....controlled by Woodbury.
Just a quick view of the gamesheet said Mounds View outshot Woodtown 20-19. Of course, these can be inaccurate.
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:25 pm
by Hankya
I thought this was a pretty good game. Too close for Woodbury though. I have to hand it to MV, they are getting better each game. Nice goal by the big guy.
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 4:29 am
by slapstkhound
Goldfishdude wrote:slapstkhound wrote:dreamonice wrote:close game but most of mv's shots weren't good scoring chances
Game wasn't as close as the score might indicate....controlled by Woodbury.
Just a quick view of the gamesheet said Mounds View outshot Woodtown 20-19. Of course, these can be inaccurate.
Shots were announced 29-19 Woodbury, second period was 14-3 Woodbury.