The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://ushsho.com/forums/
Sorry to say, does anyone except your area care? It sure seems that way. I spend my time defending Ben Hanowski from a small school and a weak section and all I get is class bigotry from people who only think kids from class AA are any good!goalieguy_14 wrote:Didn't see it on here so figured i'd throw it out there.
Who are your pre season favorites?
Even if only Section 3A people care, they have just as much right to use this forum to discuss section 3A as people from any other section.summer wrote:Sorry to say, does anyone except your area care? It sure seems that way. I spend my time defending Ben Hanowski from a small school and a weak section and all I get is class bigotry from people who only think kids from class AA are any good!
hutch still has good goaltending and thats what beat new ulm last year,hero12 wrote:I don't know a lot about hutch or litchfield, but I know Marshall will be down from other years. Also, don't expect much out of worthington windom or luverne. The sad thing is elliots list looks pretty good even considering what I just said. The southwest conference is looking at one of the weaker years its had in a while. Excluding hutch and litchfield, New Ulm should walk away with this section.
sorry about my lack of knowledge, and sorry to hear that about willmar, thought they could maybe have a shot at the 3A sectionpipesniper07 wrote:just to throw this out there, willmar moved to section 6A. theyre no longer in 3A.
I grew up in this section, granted it has changed a little, but for the most part it was all the same. Even though somebody from this section will be one of the 8 teams at state, we probably won't hear anything about them after their first game. It will be fun to see how the section plays out, but whoever comes out on top really doesn't have a chance..h20 wrote:just for all you naysayers out there that bash this section, Yes it is weak but remember Hutch did win a game last year in the State, so to dsya the leader of the pack of this section doenst stand a chance is just wrong. By the Willmar if in this section still wouldnt be able to compete with the big boys, No scoring and weak goaltending out there this year.
this is pretty close to what i would say but move redwood to about the 4 or 5 spotelliott70 wrote:1. New Ulm
2. Hutchinson
3. Litchfield
4. Marshall
5. Worthington
6. Windom
7.Luverne
8. Fairmont
9. Redwood Valley
10. Sleepy Eye
Just a guess.
I too have watched this section for years. I believe that the gap between 3A and the rest of the A teams in the state is narrowing. Granted, it is not there yet, but it gets better every year. The section got a win in last year's state.hero12 wrote:I grew up in this section, granted it has changed a little, but for the most part it was all the same. Even though somebody from this section will be one of the 8 teams at state, we probably won't hear anything about them after their first game. It will be fun to see how the section plays out, but whoever comes out on top really doesn't have a chance..h20 wrote:just for all you naysayers out there that bash this section, Yes it is weak but remember Hutch did win a game last year in the State, so to dsya the leader of the pack of this section doenst stand a chance is just wrong. By the Willmar if in this section still wouldnt be able to compete with the big boys, No scoring and weak goaltending out there this year.
'CROW' is the favorite dish of the 'bored' members.blue2141 wrote:I too have watched this section for years. I believe that the gap between 3A and the rest of the A teams in the state is narrowing. Granted, it is not there yet, but it gets better every year. The section got a win in last year's state.hero12 wrote:I grew up in this section, granted it has changed a little, but for the most part it was all the same. Even though somebody from this section will be one of the 8 teams at state, we probably won't hear anything about them after their first game. It will be fun to see how the section plays out, but whoever comes out on top really doesn't have a chance..h20 wrote:just for all you naysayers out there that bash this section, Yes it is weak but remember Hutch did win a game last year in the State, so to dsya the leader of the pack of this section doenst stand a chance is just wrong. By the Willmar if in this section still wouldnt be able to compete with the big boys, No scoring and weak goaltending out there this year.
I know that this thread will get the annual bashing from insecure "experts" trying to make themselves feel better by dissing someone else. It may not be this year but one of these years they will be eating crow.
Ya,I think about 8 to 10 hockey players are out the first game ,dont no much more.Skill Stick wrote:Apparently some new ulm players are suspended for a school related acticity?