Page 1 of 1

STATE OF HOCKEY IN JEOPARDY ?

Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 7:21 pm
by h20
Under the new cap and trade policy just passed by the House of Representives it would be likely that costs of operations at the local ice arena will increase approximatly 30 % or more due to increase electrical costs and other taxes on operational supplies. Who will have to pay it , the only way is to pass this expense on to families and players, who rent the ice


And you thought hockey is expensive now, Just wait

Re: STATE OF HOCKEY IN JEOPARDY ?

Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 9:24 pm
by wannagototherink
h20 wrote:Under the new cap and trade policy just passed by the House of Representives it would be likely that costs of operations at the local ice arena will increase approximatly 30 % or more due to increase electrical costs and other taxes on operational supplies. Who will have to pay it , the only way is to pass this expense on to families and players, who rent the ice


And you thought hockey is expensive now, Just wait
Well to me it sounds like we need to add the expense of another referee to youth games.

Won't be long and there will be a lot of kids playing basketball!

Re: STATE OF HOCKEY IN JEOPARDY ?

Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:29 am
by karl(east)
h20 wrote:Under the new cap and trade policy just passed by the House of Representives it would be likely that costs of operations at the local ice arena will increase approximatly 30 % or more due to increase electrical costs and other taxes on operational supplies. Who will have to pay it , the only way is to pass this expense on to families and players, who rent the ice


And you thought hockey is expensive now, Just wait
Source?

Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 7:14 am
by TriedThat2
Dear Water,
Good Point! Probably not the CHANGE that everyone was promised.

Of course, I think that MN Hockey has the vision to see this coming. By cutting the State Tournament banquet, AND then charging each team $400 to participate in the state tournament, I must assume that their financial planner must be Bernie Madoff.

Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 9:06 am
by frederick61
TriedThat2 wrote:Dear Water,
Good Point! Probably not the CHANGE that everyone was promised.

Of course, I think that MN Hockey has the vision to see this coming. By cutting the State Tournament banquet, AND then charging each team $400 to participate in the state tournament, I must assume that their financial planner must be Bernie Madoff.
Did Minnesota Hockey pass such a ruling last weekend?

Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 9:17 am
by TriedThat2
Fred,
That is what I am told, I cannot confirm as I have not seen the minutes from the meeting yet. It sounds as though the concept of no regions never got out of committee, and the numbers from the tournaments still looked bad, so the decision was made to eliminate the banquets and charge the teams for attending.

Personally, I find that a little disturbing with the budget that MN Hockey has.

Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:08 am
by PoniesDad45
Maybe some of teh money be taken out of the profits of the Boy's hockey tourney instead of subsidizing the girls tourney?

Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:23 pm
by h20
to Karl {east} . source is Pres. Obama right out of his mouth during the election followed by the bill that passed recently, maybe some, such as our elected officials should read the dam thing before they vote on it.
Most of Mn electrical power comes from coal and that will be hit hardest with the new tax from cap and tax, I dont think the power companies are just going to absord it, No it WILL be passed on to the consumers
also many ice arenas cool the ice with some type of refrigerant, guess what , more tax increases coming on them

well i guess we can always go outside, but i forgot , global warming will assure us that wont happen

and yes it sounds like with over $800,000 in the coffers Mn Hockey will charge $400.00 per team to play in the state tourney,, getting absurded

Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:59 pm
by karl(east)
I should have been more specific; I was wondering where you got the 30% figure from.

At any rate, if MN Hockey is sitting on $800,000 dollars, perhaps we should be directing our rants about rising costs at them, and not the federal government--which probably cares very little about the health of youth hockey. (They've got bigger fish to fry.)

I guess I'm not too concerned about this bill putting Minnesota hockey "in jeopardy." MH isn't going to sit by and watch the sport collapse under rising energy costs if it's got that much money in the bank. After all, they depend on the teams that use these arenas for their revenue.