teams in the coming years
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 12:37 pm
If you were to narrow it down to three, which teams do you think have the best shot at a title within the next few years?
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://ushsho.com/forums/
Hermantown has always been pummeled at the Bantam level by Duluth East. Not sure this is the best basis for their next "title run"EHSHack wrote:Duluth East. The Bantam A team has like 3 losses so far and is beating teams such as Hermantown 18-3 and such.
If we want to go by Bantam A teams, Wayzata, Apple Valley, Duluth East, Eagan, Lakeville South, and Rochester could be good depending on how those kids are splitting up for high school. Those would be some teams to watch in the next few years along with of course the very young Eden Prairie team. These teams could all be young next year but still competitive around the state and also will be only be better in about 2-3 years.EHSHack wrote:Duluth East. The Bantam A team has like 3 losses so far and is beating teams such as Hermantown 18-3 and such.
If Molennar (sp.) sticks around there should hardly be a drop off at the blue line with some talented JV kids filling in. I think EP will win it all two more years in a row and then drop off the face of the earth.Tenoverpar wrote:I'm sure this conversation is already happening but, take Leddy off the ice for EP and are they going to be the same team next year, I say no. Yes, they have an extremely special group of underclassman, but we're talking about taking the best player in the state and possibly the best high school aged American player in the country, off the blueline for half the game that's a HUGE drop to whoever is next in line. THis team will be fun to watch though for the next 2 years, I hope for the sake of the special story they can throw 2 more up.
HockeyMN1 wrote:If Molennar (sp.) sticks around there should hardly be a drop off at the blue line with some talented JV kids filling in. I think EP will win it all two more years in a row and then drop off the face of the earth.Tenoverpar wrote:I'm sure this conversation is already happening but, take Leddy off the ice for EP and are they going to be the same team next year, I say no. Yes, they have an extremely special group of underclassman, but we're talking about taking the best player in the state and possibly the best high school aged American player in the country, off the blueline for half the game that's a HUGE drop to whoever is next in line. THis team will be fun to watch though for the next 2 years, I hope for the sake of the special story they can throw 2 more up.
Unless somebody has a crystal ball or can communicate with Nostradomis, I guess looking at the youth teams is kinda all you got....hockeyjunkie2 wrote:If we want to go by Bantam A teams, Wayzata, Apple Valley, Duluth East, Eagan, Lakeville South, and Rochester could be good depending on how those kids are splitting up for high school. Those would be some teams to watch in the next few years along with of course the very young Eden Prairie team. These teams could all be young next year but still competitive around the state and also will be only be better in about 2-3 years.EHSHack wrote:Duluth East. The Bantam A team has like 3 losses so far and is beating teams such as Hermantown 18-3 and such.
So bantams isn't even an indicator then...what a joke...the youth programs is what you look at. Stay out of the discussion about the future.Zamman wrote:Sorry to burst the bubbles, but bantams is not high school. Just because you win at the bantam level does not mean that you win in high school. Kids grow at different rates and the level of play is a lot different.
But good luck.
Bjugstad is only a sophomore?breakout wrote:HockeyMN1 wrote:If Molennar (sp.) sticks around there should hardly be a drop off at the blue line with some talented JV kids filling in. I think EP will win it all two more years in a row and then drop off the face of the earth.Tenoverpar wrote:I'm sure this conversation is already happening but, take Leddy off the ice for EP and are they going to be the same team next year, I say no. Yes, they have an extremely special group of underclassman, but we're talking about taking the best player in the state and possibly the best high school aged American player in the country, off the blueline for half the game that's a HUGE drop to whoever is next in line. THis team will be fun to watch though for the next 2 years, I hope for the sake of the special story they can throw 2 more up.
As for sticking around, Molennar should be smart enough to learn a good lesson from Nick Leddy. Molennar's partner from his successful bantam days left for "greener pastures". Today he is struggling in the USHL and his draft stock has dropped.
Molennar needs to pick up his timing and speed while playing D. Bjugstad went right around him and scored a timely goal for Blaine. That was 10th grader vs. 10th grader, both appear to be good sized kids.
What Bantam team does HM, CDH, AHA, BSM, etc, etc... play for? You can't use bantams as an indicator for HS hockey in the Metro area.Hoops wrote:So bantams isn't even an indicator then...what a joke...the youth programs is what you look at. Stay out of the discussion about the future.Zamman wrote:Sorry to burst the bubbles, but bantams is not high school. Just because you win at the bantam level does not mean that you win in high school. Kids grow at different rates and the level of play is a lot different.
But good luck.
Flake, St. Paul, White Bear Lake, Woodbury, Tartan, St Louis Park, Wayzata....BodyShots wrote:What Bantam team does HM, CDH, AHA, BSM, etc, etc... play for? You can't use bantams as an indicator for HS hockey in the Metro area.Hoops wrote:So bantams isn't even an indicator then...what a joke...the youth programs is what you look at. Stay out of the discussion about the future.Zamman wrote:Sorry to burst the bubbles, but bantams is not high school. Just because you win at the bantam level does not mean that you win in high school. Kids grow at different rates and the level of play is a lot different.
But good luck.
I think PPG is going to disown you!sachishi4 wrote:Flake, St. Paul, White Bear Lake, Woodbury, Tartan, St Louis Park, Wayzata....BodyShots wrote:What Bantam team does HM, CDH, AHA, BSM, etc, etc... play for? You can't use bantams as an indicator for HS hockey in the Metro area.Hoops wrote: So bantams isn't even an indicator then...what a joke...the youth programs is what you look at. Stay out of the discussion about the future.
The teams I think to watch are EP, HM, CDH, Woodbury, Tartan, Jefferson, Tonka
I think Edina's jig is up. Even 5yrs out they won't have the shot they just had the last couple of yrs. Apple Valley will be loudly heard from in the next 3yrs. Shouldn't lose anyone to private at all and no one to Jrs/and or Mich for at least 2 yrs..O-townClown wrote:Eden Prairie is definitely on that list. Throw in Holy Angels and Hill-Murray for my guess.
Stretch it out to five years and I'll say Edina too. Roseau as well.
I'll never disown a fellow Pioneer. The reference was teams to watch. It was quite enjoyable to watch #1 seeded Tartan go down in the first round to #8 seeded Johnson. I will enjoy watching them in sections next year as they once again disappoint the "Tartan Nation".BodyShots wrote:I think PPG is going to disown you!sachishi4 wrote:Flake, St. Paul, White Bear Lake, Woodbury, Tartan, St Louis Park, Wayzata....BodyShots wrote: What Bantam team does HM, CDH, AHA, BSM, etc, etc... play for? You can't use bantams as an indicator for HS hockey in the Metro area.
The teams I think to watch are EP, HM, CDH, Woodbury, Tartan, Jefferson, Tonka