Page 1 of 2
BSM HOCKEY 09-10
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 6:56 pm
by GreenisGood
Since my Edina boys will be down
I want to know what people have to say about this upcoming squad.
Top Returners: Patterson, Meyers, Horn, Horton, Daly, Nelson, and Steinhauser
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 6:59 pm
by Mr.swampdonky
Very good! Look for this team in state if there section isnt to hard.
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 7:11 pm
by starmvp
They should have a good season next year with who they've got.
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 7:18 pm
by HockeyMN1
Mr.swampdonky wrote:Very good! Look for this team in state if there section isnt to hard.
Problem is EP will most likely be in their section.
bsm
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 7:19 pm
by blueblood
they will have a good record because most of their games are against teams in a mediocre to bad conference.
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 7:20 pm
by GreenisGood
their schedule was one is the top 25% this year in order of strength
look at the teams january schedule this year
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 8:20 pm
by breakout
Patterson needs to become consistent. His game is up and down like a roller coaster.
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 8:45 pm
by GreenisGood
That is true about #22
I bet he will have the C on his jersey next year.
This will cause him to show up more hopefully, when he is on he can take over games.
He makes his whole line better, rather than just individuality on the ice.
There D situation is lookin very bright, starting with meyers in net.
Daly will step up
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 9:02 pm
by mnhockey30
the real thing that bsm has to worry about is if meyers will head to juniors next year or not if he stays bsm will most likely be one of the top teams in state. Can't wait to see who is in there section
BSM's record
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 9:36 pm
by BSM99
BSM will always have 10 automatic wins because of their conference - but you can say the same thing about Hill Murray, Holy Angels. etc. But with a non conference schedule that is as tough as anyone's a good record is never a guarantee. I wouldn't expect someone from Skipperville to understand that
BSM overall schedule
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 11:36 am
by blueblood
Wouldn't expect someone from Skipperville to understand a tough non-confernence schedule?
What r u talking about. Dude, here's a side by side comparison of final rankings from PS2
Overall:
Minnetonka 2nd rated Strength of Schedule (SOS)
BSM - 38th rated SOS
Your schedule includes 14 conference games, not 10 buddy. Don't go patting yourself on the back for the other 11 games.
Re: BSM overall schedule
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 12:02 pm
by Factsmatter1
blueblood wrote:Wouldn't expect someone from Skipperville to understand a tough non-confernence schedule?
What r u talking about. Dude, here's a side by side comparison of final rankings from PS2
Overall:
Minnetonka 2nd rated Strength of Schedule (SOS)
BSM - 38th rated SOS
Your schedule includes 14 conference games, not 10 buddy. Don't go patting yourself on the back for the other 11 games.
Thanks for calling him out on this one Blueblood. I was just about to hit the send key... Everyone knows what you are left with when you drop the "M" from "BSM"....

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 12:24 pm
by stmartin123
What do you expect... it’s not benilde's fault for joining a terrible hockey conference. If you look past their conference games they do have a tough schedule. But I have to admit their record does get kind of bloated because of their weak conference.
BS....M?
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 12:25 pm
by blueblood
blueblood always deals in the facts. Just like Sgt. Joe Friday from Dragnet.
BS....M conference?
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 12:35 pm
by blueblood
It' is BSM's fault for what conference they are in.
When they moved to "AA" under Hendrickson, did they ask to join any another confrernce than the NSC? They also could have gone all non-conference like Duluth East.
They were better off playing breck and blake in the tri-metro as an "A" school than the NSC with teams like cooper and chisago lakes.
Aslo - my bad on the # of games they play in the NSC conference. According to their schedule, they play "4 point" games versus some teams. Another sign of weakness....
Re: BS....M conference?
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:17 pm
by mnhockey30
blueblood wrote:It' is BSM's fault for what conference they are in.
When they moved to "AA" under Hendrickson, did they ask to join any another confrernce than the NSC? They also could have gone all non-conference like Duluth East.
They were better off playing breck and blake in the tri-metro as an "A" school than the NSC with teams like cooper and chisago lakes.
Aslo - my bad on the # of games they play in the NSC conference. According to their schedule, they play "4 point" games versus some teams. Another sign of weakness....
When bsm moved into the NSC it was for one reason really the Metro alliance was disbanding so they decided to move into the NSC. They were asked to move into the classic lake but they decided not because the football team would be at too big of a disadvantage
Re: BS....M conference?
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:19 pm
by The51
blueblood wrote:
AAccording to their schedule, they play "4 point" games versus some teams. Another sign of weakness....
how does that show weakness? they are trying to play as few conference games as possible to play more non conference games
Weakness
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:27 pm
by blueblood
It shows how the conference is weak.
The teams are in a conference by design, but they minimize the games. Tell me what other conference does that?
The Lake - no
The Classic Lake - no
The Northwest Suburban - no
The Missota - no
etc
etc.
Re: Weakness
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:44 pm
by The51
blueblood wrote:It shows how the conference is weak.
The teams are in a conference by design, but they minimize the games. Tell me what other conference does that?
The Lake - no
The Classic Lake - no
The Northwest Suburban - no
The Missota - no
etc
etc.
oh i see what you're saying but
when joining conferences they think of all sports not just hockey
Re: Weakness
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:45 pm
by flatontheice
blueblood wrote:It shows how the conference is weak.
The teams are in a conference by design, but they minimize the games. Tell me what other conference does that?
The Lake - no
The Classic Lake - no
The Northwest Suburban - no
The Missota - no
etc
etc.
Benilde wont get out of their section for 4-5 years.
Re: Weakness
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:55 pm
by stmartin123
flatontheice wrote:blueblood wrote:It shows how the conference is weak.
The teams are in a conference by design, but they minimize the games. Tell me what other conference does that?
The Lake - no
The Classic Lake - no
The Northwest Suburban - no
The Missota - no
etc
etc.
Benilde wont get out of their section for 4-5 years.
I dont understand how you can justify what you just said considering we dont even know the section alignments for next year.
Re: Weakness
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:20 pm
by flatontheice
stmartin123 wrote:flatontheice wrote:blueblood wrote:It shows how the conference is weak.
The teams are in a conference by design, but they minimize the games. Tell me what other conference does that?
The Lake - no
The Classic Lake - no
The Northwest Suburban - no
The Missota - no
etc
etc.
Benilde wont get out of their section for 4-5 years.
I dont understand how you can justify what you just said considering we dont even know the section alignments for next year.
I do. You can assume nothing major will change with sections in the western suburbs...conferences is a different story.
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:20 am
by Hockey Stud
could anyone tell me who number 24 is for benilde? how did he do this year, i watched him in the EP game and and it seemed like the kid had a great deal of speed. is he a junior or senior?
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:48 am
by MNHockeyFan
Hockey Stud wrote:could anyone tell me who number 24 is for benilde? how did he do this year, i watched him in the EP game and and it seemed like the kid had a great deal of speed. is he a junior or senior?
Click here:
http://www.bsmhockey.com/roster_player/show/73783
Re: Weakness
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:40 pm
by OnFrozenPond
blueblood wrote:It shows how the conference is weak.
The teams are in a conference by design, but they minimize the games. Tell me what other conference does that?
The Lake - no
The Classic Lake - no
The Northwest Suburban - no
The Missota - no
etc
etc.
If I am not mistaken, I believe Kennedy only played a half schedule in the Lake.