Page 1 of 2

3AA Rosemount (3-23-0) at Woodbury (20-3-2) Feb. 26th

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:09 pm
by wbmd
Any predictions on the the 8th seeded Irish against the top seeded Royals?

Game is at Bielenberg and starts at 7:00.

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:21 pm
by Indians forever
Woodbury by 6 goals.

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:20 pm
by Domination088
Woodbury in a slaughter. Running time in the third, as well as lots of yawning from the fans

hehe

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:38 pm
by adamp1914
These threads are going to get so much better when the results aren't obvious. :)

Royals by 37

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:45 pm
by wbmd
Despite the snow and bad roads, the game is still scheduled to be played tonight.

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:49 pm
by Indians forever
wbmd wrote:Despite the snow and bad roads, the game is still scheduled to be played tonight.
Thanks Goodness!!! 8)

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:51 pm
by wbmd
Indians forever wrote:
wbmd wrote:Despite the snow and bad roads, the game is still scheduled to be played tonight.
Thanks Goodness!!! 8)
Drive safely everyone!!

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:51 pm
by hockeyjunkie2
Woodbury will win but closer than you are saying. Rosemount has been able to only win twice but they played some tight ones. Earlier this year it was 5-2 Woodbury. I'm going with something pretty similiar.

Irish- 1
Royals- 4

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:53 pm
by wbmd
hockeyjunkie2 wrote:Woodbury will win but closer than you are saying. Rosemount has been able to only win twice but they played some tight ones. Earlier this year it was 5-2 Woodbury. I'm going with something pretty similiar.

Irish- 1
Royals- 4
I have to agree with you there.

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:56 pm
by hockeyjunkie2
wbmd wrote:
hockeyjunkie2 wrote:Woodbury will win but closer than you are saying. Rosemount has been able to only win twice but they played some tight ones. Earlier this year it was 5-2 Woodbury. I'm going with something pretty similiar.

Irish- 1
Royals- 4
I have to agree with you there.
Updates from you throughout the night wbmd?

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:50 pm
by wbmd
hockeyjunkie2 wrote:
wbmd wrote:
hockeyjunkie2 wrote:Woodbury will win but closer than you are saying. Rosemount has been able to only win twice but they played some tight ones. Earlier this year it was 5-2 Woodbury. I'm going with something pretty similiar.

Irish- 1
Royals- 4
I have to agree with you there.
Updates from you throughout the night wbmd?
From followthepuck.com, Woodbury leads 1-0 in the 1st.

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:11 pm
by hockeyjunkie2
Rosemount- 0
Woodbury- 3
End of 2nd

2 Shorthanded goals for Woodbury

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:28 pm
by hockeyjunkie2
Rosemount- 1
Woodbury- 3
3rd period still playing

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:36 pm
by wbmd
hockeyjunkie2 wrote:Rosemount- 1
Woodbury- 3
3rd period still playing
4-2 now.

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:52 pm
by wbmd
Woodbury 4 Rosemount 3 in the 3rd.

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:52 pm
by hockeyjunkie2
Rosemount- 3
Woodbury- 4
FINAL

According to follow the puck

sd

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:06 pm
by pioneerhockey12
impressive showing for the royals tonight... :/

Re: sd

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:21 pm
by joycer10
pioneerhockey12 wrote:impressive showing for the royals tonight... :/
I remember a similar section game back in 1991 involving the H-M pioneers vs. a low seeded Forest Lake. Forest Lake came back from down 5-0 to take Hill into overtime and ended up hitting the post on a break-away. The Pioneers pulled off the win AND WENT ON TO WIN THE STATE TOURNAMENT. The moral is who cares Woodbury won they're moving on and all they can do is play better against Apple Valley.

Re: sd

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:23 pm
by slapstkhound
joycer10 wrote:
pioneerhockey12 wrote:impressive showing for the royals tonight... :/
I remember a similar section game back in 1991 involving the top seeded H-M pioneers a low seeded Forest Lake. Forest Lake came back from down 5-0 to take Hill into overtime and ended up hitting the post on a break-away. The Pioneers pulled off the win AND WENT ON TO WIN THE STATE TOURNAMENT. The moral is who cares Woodbury won they're moving on and all they can do is play better against Apple Valley.
Amen Joycer10

Re: sd

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:23 pm
by wbmd
joycer10 wrote:
pioneerhockey12 wrote:impressive showing for the royals tonight... :/
I remember a similar section game back in 1991 involving the top seeded H-M pioneers vs. a low seeded Forest Lake. Forest Lake came back from down 5-0 to take Hill into overtime and ended up hitting the post on a break-away. The Pioneers pulled off the win AND WENT ON TO WIN THE STATE TOURNAMENT. The moral is who cares Woodbury won they're moving on and all they can do is play better against Apple Valley.
EXACTLY!!!

sd

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:27 pm
by pioneerhockey12
all im saying is that it appears woodbury has a problem playing down to their competition

Re: sd

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:30 pm
by joycer10
pioneerhockey12 wrote:all im saying is that it appears woodbury has a problem playing down to their competition
I agree but all i'm saying is that wont be a problem anymore because they wont be playing anymore crappy teams. Woodbury comes to play against the good teams which isn't always what you want but it's all that matters right now.

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:30 pm
by pioneerhockey12
also the year your referring to hill was a 3 and forest lake was the 6 so i wouldnt really call that a huge deal

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:34 pm
by joycer10
pioneerhockey12 wrote:also the year your referring to hill was a 3 and forest lake was the 6 so i wouldnt really call that a huge deal
yea except the fact that Hill beat Forest Lake 7-1 earlier that month.

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:14 pm
by komada77
What it comes down to is Woodbury played poorly tonight but pulled out the W and now will move on to play a much better Apple Valley team. End of discussion.