HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Who is gonna take this one?

mnhcky65 wrote:Who is gonna take this one?

Not sure of the status of Gjerde. Take another D from the bears and it will be a tough ride. I think Hoffman and Putney played in excess of 30 minutes each with Hoffman playing the last 5 minutes of the Centennial game. It will be interesting to see how they recover.

BodyShots wrote:

mnhcky65 wrote:Who is gonna take this one?

Not sure of the status of Gjerde. Take another D from the bears and it will be a tough ride. I think Hoffman and Putney played in excess of 30 minutes each with Hoffman playing the last 5 minutes of the Centennial game. It will be interesting to see how they recover.

i am not sure if he will be back but if he isnt they wont have Gjerede, Hauswirth, or Walters. Thats 2 good defenders.

I beleive AHA beat WB by a goal in a srimmage earlier this season

mnhcky65 wrote:

BodyShots wrote:

mnhcky65 wrote:Who is gonna take this one?

Not sure of the status of Gjerde. Take another D from the bears and it will be a tough ride. I think Hoffman and Putney played in excess of 30 minutes each with Hoffman playing the last 5 minutes of the Centennial game. It will be interesting to see how they recover.

i am not sure if he will be back but if he isnt they wont have Gjerede, Hauswirth, or Walters. Thats 2 good defenders.

I beleive AHA beat WB by a goal in a srimmage earlier this season

First of all it's Wolter, and second of all neither Wolter or Hauswirth plays defense. But I agree it will be tough if Gjerde can't go

TheNightman wrote:

mnhcky65 wrote:

BodyShots wrote: Not sure of the status of Gjerde. Take another D from the bears and it will be a tough ride. I think Hoffman and Putney played in excess of 30 minutes each with Hoffman playing the last 5 minutes of the Centennial game. It will be interesting to see how they recover.

i am not sure if he will be back but if he isnt they wont have Gjerede, Hauswirth, or Walters. Thats 2 good defenders.

I beleive AHA beat WB by a goal in a srimmage earlier this season

First of all it's Wolter, and second of all neither Wolter or Hauswirth plays defense. But I agree it will be tough if Gjerde can't go

oops sorry hausy is healthy, its dolfay that is out. but w/o Gjerde and Dolfay playing its 2 good defenders gone.

If the Bears can pick up the slack on defense and stay outta the box, I wouldn't count them out of this one.

Stars are on a roll; I'm betting its gonna be a close, well-played game.
AHA 3
WBL 2

Holy Angels rolls 6-2.

I agree, STARS roll win 5 -2. WBL looked good against Centennial, but not as good as STA.

AHA 4-1. WBL snuck through Centennial due to poor performance in the paint by Larson. Danny dangles and snipes for two to lead the Angels to the ship.

TheMeanRichJokeMan wrote:Holy Angels rolls 6-2.

White Bear has way better chance than that.

WB- 3
AHA- 2

From what I've seen of White Bear this year, I think they have the talent to play with any team in the state. The problem is that they haven't shown that they can play hard for an entire game yet. I'll take Holy Angels 5-2.

White Bear will have to be on their game as far as defense and goaltending, especially with 2 defenders injured, but I think they can pull it off.

WBL 4
AHA 3

as from what i know...casey gjerde just got shookin' up a little and will be ready to go for their game against AHA.

i didnt think WBL had a chance against centennial. i was clearly wrong, but they were outplayed and got away with some lucky goals. WBL is going to have their hands full with mattson just like they did with pitlick. but i dont think that they are going to be as fortunate with the goals scored verse AHA.

AHA 4
WBL 1

StateofHockeyFan wrote:i didnt think WBL had a chance against centennial. i was clearly wrong, but they were outplayed and got away with some lucky goals. WBL is going to have their hands full with mattson just like they did with pitlick. but i dont think that they are going to be as fortunate with the goals scored verse AHA.

AHA 4
WBL 1

WB didnt get out played, they completely dominated until the cheap shot that put them down their second defender. With Gjerde playing WB has a great chance at this if they can contain Mattson like they contained Pitlick.

mnhcky65 wrote:

StateofHockeyFan wrote:i didnt think WBL had a chance against centennial. i was clearly wrong, but they were outplayed and got away with some lucky goals. WBL is going to have their hands full with mattson just like they did with pitlick. but i dont think that they are going to be as fortunate with the goals scored verse AHA.

AHA 4
WBL 1

WB didnt get out played, they completely dominated until the cheap shot that put them down their second defender. With Gjerde playing WB has a great chance at this if they can contain Mattson like they contained Pitlick.

They were outplayed in the first and third periods, they got a flurry of sloppy goals in the second. And i guess you consider 2 goals by a player being contained???

King of the Pond wrote:

mnhcky65 wrote:

StateofHockeyFan wrote:i didnt think WBL had a chance against centennial. i was clearly wrong, but they were outplayed and got away with some lucky goals. WBL is going to have their hands full with mattson just like they did with pitlick. but i dont think that they are going to be as fortunate with the goals scored verse AHA.

AHA 4
WBL 1

WB didnt get out played, they completely dominated until the cheap shot that put them down their second defender. With Gjerde playing WB has a great chance at this if they can contain Mattson like they contained Pitlick.

Swanson and Wallin also got 2 goals, swanson also with an assist 8 seconds after his goal... does that just make them as good as Pitlick? and yes they contianed him most of the game except for his two breakaways.

They were outplayed in the first and third periods, they got a flurry of sloppy goals in the second. And i guess you consider 2 goals by a player being contained???

Swanson and Wallin from WB also scored twice, Swanson also with an assist 8 seconds after one of his goals... Does that make those to as needed to be contained as Pitlick? Any playerr could have scored Pitlicks goals, not saying Owen is bad but every player should score on a breakaway.

King of the Pond wrote:

mnhcky65 wrote:

StateofHockeyFan wrote:i didnt think WBL had a chance against centennial. i was clearly wrong, but they were outplayed and got away with some lucky goals. WBL is going to have their hands full with mattson just like they did with pitlick. but i dont think that they are going to be as fortunate with the goals scored verse AHA.

AHA 4
WBL 1

WB didnt get out played, they completely dominated until the cheap shot that put them down their second defender. With Gjerde playing WB has a great chance at this if they can contain Mattson like they contained Pitlick.

They were outplayed in the first and third periods, they got a flurry of sloppy goals in the second. And i guess you consider 2 goals by a player being contained???

they were outplayed late in the third like they almost always are due to no depth on defense. other than that they did just fine. Gjerde still isnt certain, the big guy wants to play but he suffered a concussion yesterday and probably wont be goin today. as for wolters, if he can get his doctors note in he said he will probably be playing today. and no one noticed that(pardon the bad spelling)lennartson was out yesterday(cause of his penalty aainst hill)and will also be back today. so hopfully the bears can keep up with AHA and if Owen can have a good game I think WB can go to the ship to meet Edina.
WB-4
AHA-2

StateofHockeyFan wrote:i didnt think WBL had a chance against centennial. i was clearly wrong, but they were outplayed and got away with some lucky goals. WBL is going to have their hands full with mattson just like they did with pitlick. but i dont think that they are going to be as fortunate with the goals scored verse AHA.

AHA 4
WBL 1

Where does that line come from? Centennial was up 9-1 in shots early in the 1st period when WBL took over. WBL outplayed Centennial the rest of the first period and all of the second. Take Pitlicks two break away goals out of the equation and WBL dominated them for a period and a half. Then as usual, Sager plays his no forecheck, no pressure defense and lets the other team gain momentum and make a come back in the 3rd period. If he would let them skate the whole game, that might have been a double digit blow out for the bears.

BodyShots wrote:

StateofHockeyFan wrote:i didnt think WBL had a chance against centennial. i was clearly wrong, but they were outplayed and got away with some lucky goals. WBL is going to have their hands full with mattson just like they did with pitlick. but i dont think that they are going to be as fortunate with the goals scored verse AHA.

AHA 4
WBL 1

Where does that line come from? Centennial was up 9-1 in shots early in the 1st period when WBL took over. WBL outplayed Centennial the rest of the first period and all of the second. Take Pitlicks two break away goals out of the equation and WBL dominated them for a period and a half. Then as usual, Sager plays his no forecheck, no pressure defense and lets the other team gain momentum and make a come back in the 3rd period. If he would let them skate the whole game, that might have been a double digit blow out for the bears.

yah no ish. pappa "body shots" here is right. sager put in the fourth liners, and no gjerde, and pulled a lets just finish the game and get some kids some playing time. if WB would have played the rest of the game like they were in the first 2 periods, centennial might have thrown some more cheap shots cause they were so mad...thank goodness that didnt happen

blanco oso wrote:

BodyShots wrote:

StateofHockeyFan wrote:i didnt think WBL had a chance against centennial. i was clearly wrong, but they were outplayed and got away with some lucky goals. WBL is going to have their hands full with mattson just like they did with pitlick. but i dont think that they are going to be as fortunate with the goals scored verse AHA.

AHA 4
WBL 1

Where does that line come from? Centennial was up 9-1 in shots early in the 1st period when WBL took over. WBL outplayed Centennial the rest of the first period and all of the second. Take Pitlicks two break away goals out of the equation and WBL dominated them for a period and a half. Then as usual, Sager plays his no forecheck, no pressure defense and lets the other team gain momentum and make a come back in the 3rd period. If he would let them skate the whole game, that might have been a double digit blow out for the bears.

yah no ish. pappa "body shots" here is right. sager put in the fourth liners, and no gjerde, and pulled a lets just finish the game and get some kids some playing time. if WB would have played the rest of the game like they were in the first 2 periods, centennial might have thrown some more cheap shots cause they were so mad...thank goodness that didnt happen

I'm sure if Sager would have kept strong the whole game, White Bear would have finished with two hat tricks.

mnhcky65 wrote:

TheMeanRichJokeMan wrote:Holy Angels rolls 6-2.

White Bear has way better chance than that.

WB- 3
AHA- 2

Says who. Is there anthing you can base that on other than they got lucky against a decent (but not great) Centennial team?

STA is a far better team than White Bear and AHA rolled them by almost the same score. So is that really that unreasonable of an prediction?

AHA should roll.

WBL beat Centennial but Centennial is still the better team.

Today they beat STA 6-3 outshooting them 2-1 while being shorthanded numerous times.

Centennial would beat WBL 80% of the time, but just not yesterday.

TheMeanRichJokeMan wrote:

mnhcky65 wrote:

TheMeanRichJokeMan wrote:Holy Angels rolls 6-2.

White Bear has way better chance than that.

WB- 3
AHA- 2

Says who. Is there anthing you can base that on other than they got lucky against a decent (but not great) Centennial team?

STA is a far better team than White Bear and AHA rolled them by almost the same score. So is that really that unreasonable of an prediction?

last time i checked, centennial was #4 in state, and undefeated. and whens the last time you saw WB play STA or AHA?and yes i think 6-2 is a very unreasonable prediction...i mean really...we will see today but i dont think who ever wins will win by more than 2 goals